Search USGSSearch

USGS · 70027003

Proterozoic tectonostratigraphy and paleogeography of central Madagascar derived from detrital zircon U-Pb age populations

Abstract

Detrital zircon U‐Pb ages determined by SHRIMP distinguish two clastic sequences among Proterozoic metasedimentary rocks from central Madagascar. The Itremo Group is older: zircon data, stromatolite characteristics, and carbon isotope data all point to a depositional age around 1500–1700 Ma. The Molo Group is younger, deposited between ∼620 Ma (the age of the youngest zircon) and ∼560 Ma (the age of metamorphic overgrowths on detrital cores). Geochronologic provenance analysis of the Itremo Group points to sources in East Africa as well as local sources in central and southern Madagascar but provides no evidence for a detrital contribution from northern and eastern Madagascar nor from southern India. Detrital zircon and sedimentologic similarities between rocks of the Itremo Group and the Zambian Muva Supergroup suggest a lithostratigraphic correlation between the two. The Molo Group has a strong 1000–1100 Ma detrital signature that also indicates an east African provenance and suggests a Neoproterozoic geographic connection with Sri Lanka but shows no indication of input from the Dharwar craton and eastern Madagascar. Central Madagascar was probably juxtaposed with the Tanzanian craton in the Paleo‐ and Mesoproterozoic, whereas northern and eastern Madagascar were connected to India. Internal assembly of Madagascar postdates Neoproterozoic Molo Group sedimentation and is likely to have occurred at about 560 Ma.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R. Cox, D.S. Coleman, C.B. Chokel, S.B. DeOreo, Joseph L. Wooden, A.S. Collins, B. De Waele, A. Kroner. 2004. Proterozoic tectonostratigraphy and paleogeography of central Madagascar derived from detrital zircon U-Pb age populations. https://doi.org/10.1086/421070

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Defining the hafnium isotopic signature of the Appalachian orogen through analysis of detrital zircons from modern fluvial sediments

Fluvial sediments are the product of erosion, weathering, and transport of bedrock within a well-defined catchment area, and their constituent grains may therefore record valuable information about the lithological and geochemical properties of geologic units within the upstream drainage. Analysis of U-Pb ages and Lu/Hf isotopic values in detrital zircon grains from major rivers in the eastern USA characterizes these parameters within broad areas of the Appalachian orogen. In this study, five modern fluvial sediment samples, collected across ~1500 km and representing 216,000 km2 of total catchment area, reveal that the relative proportions of Mesoproterozoic to Paleozoic U-Pb crystallization ages vary widely across the former Laurentian margin. However, εHft values in the same samples are largely consistent regardless of their geographic location. Mesoproterozoic (Grenville orogen) zircons display a more limited range of εHft values (approximately 0 to +10 εHft units) compared to the more negative, more variable values (-15 to +10) found in grains from the Paleozoic orogenies. When compared to other published modern detrital samples from the Gulf Coastal Plain, Appalachian samples show more similarity to each other and to the Pleistocene of Florida than to those from the Mississippi River mouth, likely because the latter also sources sediments from the Cordillera of western North America. More negative εHft values in Paleozoic zircons may be genetically related to older Mesoproterozoic grains, as they are compatible with the continued isotopic evolution of Lu/Hf derived from the mantle between 1.2 and 2.0 Ga. Hafnium geochemistry in detrital grains may therefore have some utility in discerning sediment provenance between the Appalachians and other regions, and may also provide useful information regarding the nature of crustal generation through time.

Journal of Geology

The Pliocene-to-present course of the Tennessee River

The Tennessee River, a primary drainage of the southern Appalachians and significant sediment source for the Gulf of Mexico, is generally considered to be the product of captures that rerouted the river from a more direct gulfward course. Sedimentary and genetic evidence indicates that a paleo-Tennessee flowed into the Mobile Basin through the late Miocene, although alternate models propose other redirections of the river. We constrain the river course’s age by dating terraces near Pickwick, Tennessee, with cosmogenic 26 Al/ 10 Be isochron burial dating. We find that the river’s present path dates to at least the early Pliocene.

Tennessee

River terrace evidence of tectonic processes in the eastern North American plate interior, South Anna River, Virginia

We show that long-recognized seismicity in the central Virginia seismic zone of the eastern North American intraplate setting arises primarily from tectonic processes predicted by new, fully coupled plate tectonic geodynamic models. The study leverages much new geophysical and geologic data following the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake that ruptured a steeply dipping, northwest-verging reverse fault traversed by the South Anna River. The data are primarily assembled from a flight of six fluvial terrace geomorphic markers identified and correlated on texture, relative weathering, and numeric ages including one terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (TCN) profile and 30 luminescence dates. Terrace thickness, stratigraphic age models, and incision rates downstream and upstream of the 2011 rupture are different. Long-term river incision rates of ∼25–30 m/My are superimposed on regional TCN-determined erosion rates of ∼8.5 m/My; however, there are at least 10 m of tectonically driven incision in the epicentral region at rates of ∼30–94 m/My. The inferred deformation resembles a hanging wall anticline above a blind reverse fault with a diffuse overlying carapace of minor brittle faults, an interpretation supported by seismology as well as bedrock and saprolite mapped across the epicentral region. These results are further supported by channel metrics that show nonuniform channel steepness ( k sn ) and a predicted steady-state channel elevation different from the actual channel elevation across the epicentral region. If all of the observed deformation is a consequence of the fault that ruptured in 2011, the recurrence interval of Mineral-sized events would be ∼5.5 ky.

Virginia