Community preparedness for lava flows from Mauna Loa and Hualālai volcanoes, Kona, Hawai'i

Chris E. Gregg; Bruce F. Houghton; Douglas Paton; Donald A. Swanson; David M. Johnston

doi:10.1007/s00445-004-0338-x

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70026919

Community preparedness for lava flows from Mauna Loa and Hualālai volcanoes, Kona, Hawai'i

Chris E. Gregg·Bruce F. Houghton·Douglas Paton·Donald A. Swanson·David M. Johnston

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Lava flows from Mauna Loa and Hualālai volcanoes are a major volcanic hazard that could impact the western portion of the island of Hawai'i (e.g., Kona). The most recent eruptions of these two volcanoes to affect Kona occurred in A.D. 1950 and ca. 1800, respectively. In contrast, in eastern Hawai'i, eruptions of neighboring Kilauea volcano have occurred frequently since 1955, and therefore have been the focus for hazard mitigation. Official preparedness and response measures are therefore modeled on typical eruptions of Kilauea. The combinations of short-lived precursory activity (e.g., volcanic tremor) at Mauna Loa, the potential for fast-moving lava flows, and the proximity of Kona communities to potential vents represent significant emergency management concerns in Kona. Less is known about past eruptions of Hualālai, but similar concerns exist. Future lava flows present an increased threat to personal safety because of the short times that may be available for responding. Mitigation must address not only the specific characteristics of volcanic hazards in Kona, but also the manner in which the hazards relate to the communities likely to be affected. This paper describes the first steps in developing effective mitigation plans: measuring the current state of people's knowledge of eruption parameters and the implications for their safety. We present results of a questionnaire survey administered to 462 high school students and adults in Kona. The rationale for this study was the long lapsed time since the last Kona eruption, and the high population growth and expansion of infrastructure over this time interval. Anticipated future growth in social and economic infrastructure in this area provides additional justification for this work. The residents of Kona have received little or no specific information about how to react to future volcanic eruptions or warnings, and short-term preparedness levels are low. Respondents appear uncertain about how to respond to threatening lava flows and overestimate the minimum time available to react, suggesting that personal risk levels are unnecessarily high. A successful volcanic warning plan in Kona must be tailored to meet the unique situation there. Springer-Verlag 2004.

Explore related subjects

Bulletin of Volcanology Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 19.287813240262167° to 19.72534224805787° latitude; -155.9893798828125° to -155.3466796875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Chris E. Gregg, Bruce F. Houghton, Douglas Paton, Donald A. Swanson, David M. Johnston. 2004-03-12. Community preparedness for lava flows from Mauna Loa and Hualālai volcanoes, Kona, Hawai'i. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-004-0338-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Satellite observations, plume dynamics and volcanic lightning from the 2023 eruption of Shishaldin Volcano, Alaska

The 2023 eruption of Shishaldin Volcano, Alaska, provided an unusually well-monitored example of a “dry” (non-hydromagmatic) explosive basaltic eruption with sustained, buoyant plumes, and pyroclastic density currents. Here, we examine the 13 basaltic paroxysms that occurred between July and November 2023 using geostationary satellite observations, plume modeling, and volcanic lightning detection to characterize mass eruption rates and plume dynamics. We show that seven volcanic plumes reached 10–14 km above sea level, sustained for minutes to tens of minutes. Translating plume heights into mass eruption rates, using both empirical scaling and one-dimensional plume modeling, gives peak rates of 10 4 –10 7 kg·s −1 and a total erupted volume of ~ 0.05 km 3 (dense rock equivalent) across the eruption sequence. Despite the moderate intensity of this eruption, automated satellite detection algorithms generally failed to detect volcanic ash. We attribute this persistent challenge to the fines-poor grain size distribution of the eruption. Volcanic lightning provides an additional window into the eruption dynamics. A total of 491 volcanic lightning flashes were detected, concentrated during seven of the most energetic phases. The timing of this electrical activity suggests that lightning only became detectable by the global lightning monitoring network when plumes ascended to atmospheric levels favorable for ice formation. Based on the available data, we infer that the low fine ash content of the plumes, combined with minimal water and ice, led to the overall modest rates of lightning (1–13 flashes per minute) compared to “wet” eruptions of similar intensity. These results show that combining satellite observations, plume modeling, and lightning detection provides a valuable timeline of eruptive intensity, even for “dry” basaltic eruptions in remote locations.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Examples of eruption response teams from the Alaska Volcano Observatory

During times of eruption response, volcano observatories need to organize themselves differently than during normal operations. The number of formal operational roles grows to ensure that critical responsibilities are covered, including management of all activities at the observatory as well as increased staffing to ensure proper surveillance of data and issuance of timely notices and warnings. The scope and approach differ for each observatory and, in fact, for different eruptions. The Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO) maintains an extensive monitoring program and issues forecasts and warnings about volcanic eruptions and unrest in Alaska. Since 2000, AVO has used formal roles to perform these duties and has implemented a variety of team approaches to respond to larger eruptions. For the Augustine (2006) and Redoubt (2009) eruptions, management scaled from 3 up to ~ 8 people in a command team to cover all aspects of the response. During these and other eruptions (e.g., Okmok, 2008), an operations room was staffed continuously to cover real-time responsibilities pertaining to monitoring and issuing alerts while the command team focused on overall management. More recently, such as for Bogoslof in 2016–2017 and Shishaldin in 2019 and 2023, AVO used a virtual real-time response team to handle warning tasks and variations of an Observatory Volcanic Event Response Team (OVERT; Moran et al. 2024) to manage overall observatory response activities. In 2025, AVO employed a formal OVERT for the first time to oversee its response to unrest at Mount Spurr. Frequent implementation, nimble scaling, constant evaluation, flexibility, and good communication make the team approach effective. We present examples of several response teams used over the last 25 years, and lessons learned from them, in the hope that these will be helpful to other observatories facing crisis responses. These examples may also allow stakeholders and the public to better understand how observatories work.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Timescales of cumulate mobilization and mixing for the 1868 A.D. eruption of Mauna Loa, Island of Hawai‘i

The deadly 1868 A.D. eruption of Mauna Loa’s lower Southwest Rift Zone (Island of Hawai‘i) included a M7.9 earthquake and associated tsunami and landslides, demonstrating the severe hazards posed by Earth’s largest active subaerial volcano. To better understand the relationship between intense seismic activity, dike emplacement, magma storage, transport histories, and mobilization of olivine cumulates at Mauna Loa, we examine compositional zoning of olivine in the 1868 lava flows. Samples range from basalt (< 10% olivine) to picrite (30–40% olivine). The olivine cargo is heterogeneous (Fo 78.2–89.2 ; forsterite = [Mg/(Mg + Fe) × 100]) but dominated by ~ Fo 89 cores that lie above the Fe-Mg equilibrium field of host glasses. Crystal rims < Fo 80 are due to post-eruptive modification in slow cooling lava flows. Minor element compositions fall within the range of other Mauna Loa olivine erupted in the past 200 years. Olivine crystals exhibit both normal and complex Fo zoning patterns that yield timescales of diffusive re-equilibration that range from 3 to 258 days, with 72% of crystals recording 71 days or less. These timescales correspond to magmatic priming of the summit reservoir system ~ 2 months prior to the eruption and the M7.9 earthquake likely facilitated the transport of the crystal-rich summit-derived magmas downrift shortly prior to eruption. If the recently proposed faster Fe-Mg diffusion coefficient is used, timescales instead range from < 1 day to 25 days, with most recording 1 week or less. In this scenario, most of the olivine zoning would have to have been generated after the M7.9 earthquake perturbed the system.

Hawaii↗