Hydrological Aspects of Weather Prediction and Flood Warnings: Report of the Ninth Prospectus Development Team of the U.S. Weather Research Program

K.K. Droegemeier; J.D. Smith; S. Businger; C. Doswell; J. Doyle; C. Duffy; E. Foufoula-Georgiou; T. Graziano; L.D. James; V. Krajewski; M. LeMone; D. Lettenmaier; C. Mass; R. Pielke; P. Ray; S. Rutledge; J. Schaake; E. Zipser

USGS · 70022047

Hydrological Aspects of Weather Prediction and Flood Warnings: Report of the Ninth Prospectus Development Team of the U.S. Weather Research Program

K.K. Droegemeier·J.D. Smith·S. Businger·C. Doswell·J. Doyle·C. Duffy·E. Foufoula-Georgiou·T. Graziano·L.D. James·V. Krajewski·M. LeMone·D. Lettenmaier·C. Mass·R. Pielke·P. Ray·S. Rutledge·J. Schaake·E. Zipser

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Among the many natural disasters that disrupt human and industrial activity in the United States each year, including tornadoes, hurricanes, extreme temperatures, and lightning, floods are among the most devastating and rank second in the loss of life. Indeed, the societal impact of floods has increased during the past few years and shows no sign of abating. Although the scientific questions associated with flooding and its accurate prediction are many and complex, an unprecedented opportunity now exists - in light of new observational and computing systems and infrastructures, a much improved understanding of small-scale meteorological and hydrological processes, and the availability of sophisticated numerical models and data assimilation systems - to attack the flood forecasting problem in a comprehensive manner that will yield significant new scientific insights and corresponding practical benefits. The authors present herein a set of recommendations for advancing our understanding of floods via the creation of natural laboratories situated in a variety of local meteorological and hydrological settings. Emphasis is given to floods caused by convection and cold season events, fronts and extratropical cyclones, orographic forcing, and hurricanes and tropical cyclones following landfall. Although the particular research strategies applied within each laboratory setting will necessarily vary, all will share the following principal elements: (a) exploitation of those couplings important to flooding that exist between meteorological and hydrological processes and models; (b) innovative use of operational radars, research radars, satellites, and rain gauges to provide detailed spatial characterizations of precipitation fields and rates, along with the use of this information in hydrological models and for improving and validating microphysical algorithms in meteorological models; (c) comparisons of quantitative precipitation estimation algorithms from both research (especially multiparameter) and operational radars against gauge data as well as output produced by meso- and storm-scale models; (d) use of data from dense, temporary river gauge networks to trace the fate of rain from its starting location in small basins to the entire stream and river network; and (e) sensitivity testing in the design and implementation of separate as well as coupled meteorological and hydrologic models, the latter designed to better represent those nonlinear feedbacks between the atmosphere and land that are known to play an important role in runoff prediction. Vital to this effort will be the creation of effective and sustained linkages between the historically separate though scientifically related disciplines of meteorology and hydrology, as well as their observational infrastructures and research methodologies.

Explore related subjects

Conference Paper

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

K.K. Droegemeier, J.D. Smith, S. Businger, C. Doswell, J. Doyle, C. Duffy, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, T. Graziano, L.D. James, V. Krajewski, M. LeMone, D. Lettenmaier, C. Mass, R. Pielke, P. Ray, S. Rutledge, J. Schaake, E. Zipser. 2000. Hydrological Aspects of Weather Prediction and Flood Warnings: Report of the Ninth Prospectus Development Team of the U.S. Weather Research Program. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70022047

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Stability changes after weak layer collapse: Insights from an unexpected dataset

While conducting avalanche mitigation or traveling through the backcountry, avalanche professionals sometimes experience a "whumpf": a collapse-mode crack accompanied by surface cracking that does not produce an avalanche. These whumpfs are a clear warning sign of instability in the surrounding terrain. But assessing the collapsed slope itself, if it is steep enough to avalanche, carries much more uncertainty. Can slopes that whumpf and are steep enough to slide still avalanche? The answer to this question supports avalanche mitigators and ski guides in assessing whether to open such slopes. Previous research on collapsed slopes is limited to one study conducted before tests that estimate crack propagation propensity, such as the Propagation Saw Test (PST), were developed. This work showed that weak layer shear strength decreased immediately after collapsing and then increased over time. However, no research has examined crack propagation propensity after a whumpf. Studying propagation propensity is key for assessing how whumpfs immediately affect slope stability. To improve our understanding of changes in propagation propensity following weak layer collapse, we conducted PSTs on a test slope in the hours and days after an unexpected collapse occurred on a layer of surface hoar. Two PSTs at our study site three days prior to this collapse provided an estimate of weak layer propagation propensity. PST cut lengths decreased immediately following the collapse, suggesting that the collapse increased the propagation propensity. However, over the next 4-5 hours, PST cut lengths steadily increased at our site, likely due to ongoing sintering and strengthening in the collapsed weak layer. By the end of day two, we were no longer able to initiate propagation, suggesting substantial stabilization of the weak layer. Our results support prior findings and observations suggesting that slopes may remain capable of producing avalanches immediately after a collapse but likely stabilize over the next day or two. Although this research does not provide answers about precisely when a slope becomes stable after a collapse, it does highlight uncertainties in our understanding and interpretation of the stability of slopes that have whumped.

Montana↗

USGS2026

Revisiting avalanche destructive scale and associated mass estimates

Avalanche destructive (D) size classifications are essential for forecasting, communication, and risk management, yet size estimation remains one of the more subjective elements of avalanche assessment. Practitioners typically rely on visual impressions of destructive potential, path length, and estimated mass and volume. Recent work indicates that size is often underestimated even by experienced observers, especially when based on photographs or distant observations. Although mass is central to defining destructive size, the empirical foundations of mass–size relationships have rarely been revisited, and expert variability in size assignment could be decreased if more consistent operational tools were available. We evaluated whether a simple, practitioner-focused calculation tool using slab dimensions, snow density, and snow water equivalent can provide reliable mass estimates that correspond meaningfully with existing destructive size classes. Using this tool, we estimated avalanche mass and compared the results to observer-assigned D sizes. We also simulated mass outputs using a dense flow avalanche simulation module and compared observer estimates and simple-tool outputs to recent volume-based methods for D-size classification. Across 143 well-documented dry snow avalanches from multiple avalanche climates, the size estimation tool tends to classify avalanches larger than field-based observers. We found a mean bias of 0.47 D-size units and a typical (mean absolute) disagreement of 0.56. Our results show that 95% of events landed within one whole D-class of each other and 71% within a half-class. Agreement between the simple tool mass estimates and dense flow avalanche simulations was generally strong, though discrepancies emerged in cases with substantial entrainment or complex terrain. We compared the size tool to the simulation module with entrainment (n=4) and without entrainment (n=8). With entrainment, the two methods estimate the same D-size class in 4 of 4 comparable events and 7 of 8 events without entrainment. Also, the simulation module estimates larger sizes than the observer in 7 of 8 cases without entrainment and all 4 cases with entrainment. These findings support that development of practical, mass-based tools could improve D-size consistency and emphasize the value of revisiting historical mass–size relationships. The accompanying application offers practitioners an accessible and operationally useful resource for improving D-size estimation from field observations.

Conference Paper↗

USGS2026

Start-zone characteristics and timing of wet slab avalanches In Colorado

Wet slab avalanches (WSAs) release when liquid water reduces the strength of a buried weak layer or interface, and their timing is governed primarily by the snowpack energy balance and the movement of meltwater. We classified 717 WSAs from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center database (2011–2025) into five start-zone terrain categories and analysed the timing of naturally triggered, near- and above-treeline events using rank-based and Bayesian hierarchical methods. Start-zone terrain strongly governs the natural occurrence of WSAs: approximately 64% released in Rocky start zones (Cliffs/Rocks), while only ≈4% occurred on Open Slopes. After controlling for latitude and aspect, Rocky start zones released approximately five days before Open Slopes (90% CrI: 0.6–9.9 days). Latitude was the dominant timing predictor, shifting release by roughly 3–4 weeks from southern to northern Colorado. Cornice start zones concentrated WSA activity in early to mid-spring, with 40 of 41 releasing before mid-May. These findings support start-zone terrain classification as a low-cost addition to observation protocols for improving the spatial targeting of wet slab outlooks.

Colorado↗