Search USGS⌕ Search

USGS · 70017023

Is Obsidian Hydration Dating Affected by Relative Humidity?

Abstract

Experiments carried out under temperatures and relative humidities that approximate ambient conditions show that the rate of hydration of obsidian is a function of the relative humidity, as well as of previously established variables of temperature and obsidian chemical composition. Measurements of the relative humidity of soil at 25 sites and at depths of between 0.01 and 2 m below ground show that in most soil environments, at depths below about 0.25 m, the relative humidity is constant at 100%. We have found that the thickness of the hydrated layer developed on obsidian outcrops exposed to the sun and to relative humidities of 30-90% is similar to that formed on other portions of the outcrop that were shielded from the sun and exposed to a relative humidity of approximately 100%. Surface samples of obsidian exposed to solar heating should hydrate more rapidly than samples buried in the ground. However, the effect of the lower mean relative humidity experiences by surface samples tends to compensate for the elevated temperature, which may explain why obsidian hydration ages of surface samples usually approximate those derived from buried samples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I. Friedman, F.W. Trembour, G.I. Smith, F.L. Smith. 2017-01-20. Is Obsidian Hydration Dating Affected by Relative Humidity?. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1994.1020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Age reassignment using luminescence dating for the Mammoth Site, Black Hills, South Dakota, USA

The Mammoth Site (MS) at Hot Springs, South Dakota, provides a unique opportunity to reconstruct paleoenvironmental conditions on the Northern Great Plains of the United States. Previous radiocarbon analyses of mammoth bone apatite suggested the MS sinkhole was deposited ∼42–23 cal ka BP. However, two U-series ages and one thermoluminescence (TL) age ranged between 150 and 101 ka, suggesting the bones were considerably older. We analyzed six samples from the bone bed using infrared-stimulated luminescence (IRSL) on feldspars, because the quartz luminescence was saturated; the ages ranged from approximately 232 to 160 ka, showing better agreement with previous U-series and TL analyses. In addition, we dated three samples on two terraces that are at lower elevation than the MS. Our new IRSL ages show that the sediments of the MS were likely well bleached, derived from pond margin runoff events, and deposited as sandy-silt laminae couplets. Our chronology indicates that the 6-m-thick bone-bearing sediments accumulated at a rate of approximately 12 mm/yr and that deposition occurred during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 6 and MIS 7, not MIS 2 and MIS 3 as previously published.

South Dakota↗

A multiproxy reconstruction of changes in sea ice and primary productivity at IODP Site U1339 (Umnak Plateau, Bering Sea) during Marine Isotope Stage 11

The extreme warmth of Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 has been extensively studied in the terrestrial realm; however, less is known about its expression in the North Pacific. Here, we present a multiproxy record from Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Site U1339 in the southeastern Bering Sea (Umnak Plateau). We use sedimentology, diatoms, and organic geochemistry to reconstruct sea ice and primary productivity from the end of MIS 12 to the beginning of MIS 10 (430–368 ka) at this site. In late MIS 12, the Umnak Plateau experienced extensive seasonal sea ice cover, with spring sea ice concentration near 100%. Based on diatoms and ice-rafted debris, sea ice declined to year-round ice-free conditions during deglaciation but readvanced during the interglacial climatic optimum. In contrast, sea ice has not been present at the Umnak Plateau throughout the Holocene. During MIS 11, sea ice at this site may have persisted due to a more easterly and/or weaker Aleutian Low. Laminated sediments indicate enhanced seasonal productivity during deglaciation. However, productivity does not remain high throughout the interglacial. The decline in productivity during MIS 11 occurs independently of fluctuations in sea ice and upwelling and may be due to increasing nutrient limitation.

Alaska↗