Search USGSSearch

USGS · 5230190

Lethal Dietary Toxicities of Environmental Contaminants and Pesticides to Coturnix

Abstract

Five-day subacute dietary toxicity tests of 193 potential environmental contaminants, pesticides, organic solvents, and various adjuvants are presented for young coturnix (Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica Temminck and Schlegel). The report provides the most comprehensive data base available for avian subacute dietary toxicity tests and is primarily intended for use in ranking toxicities by a standard method that has a reasonable degree of environmental relevance. Findings are presented in two parts: Part I is a critique of selected drugs that includes discussion of subacute toxicity in relation to chemical class and structure, pesticide formulation, and age of animals; Part II is a summary of toxicologic findings for each test substance and provides a statistically basis for comparing toxicities. Data presented include the median lethal concentration (LC50), slope of the probit regression curve (dose-response curve), response chronology, and food consumption. We observed that: 1) fewer than 15% of the compounds were classed 'very' or 'highly' toxic (i.e, LC50 < 200 ppm) and all of these were either chlorinated hydrocarbons, organophosphates, or organometallics; 2) subacute toxicity may vary widely among structurally similar chemicals and between different formulations of the same chemical; therefore, conclusions about lethal hazard must be made cautiously until the actual formulation of inset has been tested: 3) inclusion of a general standard in each battery of tests is useful for detection of atypical trials and monitoring population changes but should not be used indiscriminantly for adjusting LC50's for intertest differences unless the chemicals of concern and the standard elicit their toxicities through the same action; 4) although other species have been tested effectively under the subacute protocol, coturnix were ideal for the stated purpose of this research because they are inexpensive, well-adapted to the laboratory environment, and yield good intertest reproducibility of response.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E. F. Hill, M.B. Camardese. 1986. Lethal Dietary Toxicities of Environmental Contaminants and Pesticides to Coturnix. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/5230190

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Genetic differentiation of walleye stocks in Lake St. Clair and western Lake Erie

Allozyme data from six spawning sites of walleyes (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) in western Lake Erie and two in Lake St. Clair demonstrated significant differences between allelic frequencies in fish from the two lakes. In contrast, differences were only slight between walleyes from different spawning sites within each lake. Of 21 presumptive genetic loci assayed electrophoretically, 4 were polymorphic enough to differentiate the populations. Allelic frequencies differentiating the stocks were stable between year classes, sexes, and sample years, showing that fry hatched in a particular area were returning there to spawn. These findings support other evidence for homing in Great Lakes walleyes.

Fish and Wildlife Technical Report

Dicofol (Kelthane) as an environmental contaminant: A review

Dicofol is persistent in soil and on plants. No compelling evidence exists that dicofol breaks down or is metabolized to DDTr in nature. Dicofol does not accumulate in birds as rapidly as DDE, and it has reproductive effects that are less harmful than DDE. Fish, birds, and mammals are reproductively sensitive to dicofol products, but levels presently found in wildlife are below levels shown experimentally to cause significant harm. Eggs of fish-eating wild birds from citrus, cotton, and apple-growing areas should be analyzed for dicofol residues. Nest success of fish-eating birds in the most contaminated populations should be studied to evaluate the environmental effects of dicofol.

Fish and Wildlife Technical Report