Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 5222949

A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA

Niles Lehman·Peter Clarkson·L. David Mech·Thomas J. Meier·Robert K. Wayne
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA analyses have not been used in combination to study relatedness in natural populations. We present an approach that involves defining the mean fingerprint similarities among individuals thought to be unrelated because they have different mtDNA genotypes. Two classes of related individuals are identified by their distance in standard errors above this mean value. The number of standard errors is determined by analysis of the association between fingerprint similarity and relatedness in a population with a known genealogy. We apply this approach to gray wolf packs from Minnesota, Alaska, and the Northwest Territories. Our results show that: (1) wolf packs consist primarily of individuals that are closely related genetically, but some packs contain unrelated, non-reproducing individuals; (2) dispersal among packs within the same area is common; and (3) short-range dispersal appears more common for female than male wolves. The first two of these genetically-based observations are consistent with behavioral data on pack structure and dispersal in wolves, while the apparent sex bias in dispersal was not expected.

Explore related subjects

Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Niles Lehman, Peter Clarkson, L. David Mech, Thomas J. Meier, Robert K. Wayne. 1992. A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00173944

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Family life is critical for migration and survival in a long-lived social bird

Extended parental care is common among birds and particularly well known among long-lived migratory species. Yet, factors influencing the duration of parental care are poorly understood, and empirical evidence for the functional importance of family life for offspring development is scarce. Using unique tracking and genetic data of 55 adult and juvenile migratory Bewick’s swans, among which 18 parent-offspring pairs and 13 sibling pairs, we quantify variation in family bond duration and identify the cause and consequences of their dissolution. Families generally broke up during the second half of the first northward migration of the offspring, when offspring were nearly one year old. Earlier separation occurred on the wintering grounds in response to disturbance ( n = 10 juveniles) and led to delayed migration and, critically, lower survival (40 vs. 86%). Our results provide rare empirical evidence that family bonds, as a pathway for social learning, are not just important, but vital to the migration and survival of young family-living birds.

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology↗
USGS2026

Cook Inlet beluga whale calling varies by group characteristics, behavior, and tidal state

Communication allows social species to exchange information among group members. In aquatic environments, acoustic signals are among the most effective forms of communication and are important for many species, including cetaceans. Beluga whales ( Delphinapterus leucas ) are highly social and vocal, yet little is known about the functionality of their social calls. To examine context-dependent vocal behavior in belugas, we collected passive acoustic data and fine-scale behavioral observations for the endangered Cook Inlet beluga population. The resulting dataset includes 1,720 annotated vocalizations collected over 21 behaviorally encoded encounters. We fit generalized linear mixed models to these data to investigate the effect of behavioral state, group size, calf presence, and tidal state on (1) calling rate (number of calls/minute) and (2) call category (whistles, pulsed calls, combined calls). Belugas were more likely to call when traveling and had higher calling rates during flood tides. Group-level calling rate increased sublinearly with group size, suggesting that individuals called less in larger groups, possibly reflecting increased listening, vocal coordination, or a strategy to avoid acoustic masking. Group calling rate increased before transitions between traveling and milling, suggesting a possible link between communication and behavioral transitions. Whistles were more prevalent when traveling, while pulsed calls were more prevalent when milling. Combined calls occurred only when calves were present, indicating the importance of these calls in communication with calves. Identifying these communication patterns and the contexts in which they occur can enhance our understanding of beluga whale ecology and aid in conservation efforts via passive acoustic monitoring.

Alaska↗
USGS2025

Effects of phylogeny and habitat on social structure and behavior of two equid species

Horses ( Equus caballus ) and donkeys ( E. asinus ) are closely related species with different evolutionary histories: their ancestral forms have different social systems related to their adaptations to different ecosystems, exhibiting female defense and resource defense polygyny respectively. We explored any plasticity of response and possible effects of phylogeny and habitat on these species in a feral state, comparing phylogenetic and habitat effects on behavior. We examined two feral horse populations in similar habitat in western Utah, USA, and two feral donkey populations in different habitat types (central Utah Colorado Plateau and central Arizona Sonoran Desert, USA), over 4 years. Species differences were observed: all donkeys spent more time feeding, moving, and lying down than horses, with horses standing more. Donkeys in the Sonoran Desert spent more time feeding and moving, and less time standing and lying down than on the Colorado Plateau. Horses showed less agonistic and affiliative behavior than donkeys. Between species there was no difference in network degree between horses and donkeys, and donkeys had a more saturated network with higher eigenvector centrality but lower clustering coefficient and fewer connected components than horses. Within a species, we found differences between horse populations in network degree, components, and edge density but no difference between donkey populations. Flexibility in how behavior is expressed reflects an interaction between a species’ habitat and their behavioral response to that habitat. Moreover, phylogenetic history seemingly plays a strong role in the behavioral ecology of a species, even after they are domesticated and become feralized.

Arizona, Utah↗