Search USGS⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 5222949

A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA

Niles Lehman·Peter Clarkson·L. David Mech·Thomas J. Meier·Robert K. Wayne
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA analyses have not been used in combination to study relatedness in natural populations. We present an approach that involves defining the mean fingerprint similarities among individuals thought to be unrelated because they have different mtDNA genotypes. Two classes of related individuals are identified by their distance in standard errors above this mean value. The number of standard errors is determined by analysis of the association between fingerprint similarity and relatedness in a population with a known genealogy. We apply this approach to gray wolf packs from Minnesota, Alaska, and the Northwest Territories. Our results show that: (1) wolf packs consist primarily of individuals that are closely related genetically, but some packs contain unrelated, non-reproducing individuals; (2) dispersal among packs within the same area is common; and (3) short-range dispersal appears more common for female than male wolves. The first two of these genetically-based observations are consistent with behavioral data on pack structure and dispersal in wolves, while the apparent sex bias in dispersal was not expected.

Explore related subjects

Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Niles Lehman, Peter Clarkson, L. David Mech, Thomas J. Meier, Robert K. Wayne. 1992. A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00173944

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Family life is critical for migration and survival in a long-lived social bird

Extended parental care is common among birds and particularly well known among long-lived migratory species. Yet, factors influencing the duration of parental care are poorly understood, and empirical evidence for the functional importance of family life for offspring development is scarce. Using unique tracking and genetic data of 55 adult and juvenile migratory Bewick’s swans, among which 18 parent-offspring pairs and 13 sibling pairs, we quantify variation in family bond duration and identify the cause and consequences of their dissolution. Families generally broke up during the second half of the first northward migration of the offspring, when offspring were nearly one year old. Earlier separation occurred on the wintering grounds in response to disturbance ( n = 10 juveniles) and led to delayed migration and, critically, lower survival (40 vs. 86%). Our results provide rare empirical evidence that family bonds, as a pathway for social learning, are not just important, but vital to the migration and survival of young family-living birds.

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology↗
USGS2026

Cook Inlet beluga whale calling varies by group characteristics, behavior, and tidal state

Communication allows social species to exchange information among group members. In aquatic environments, acoustic signals are among the most effective forms of communication and are important for many species, including cetaceans. Beluga whales ( Delphinapterus leucas ) are highly social and vocal, yet little is known about the functionality of their social calls. To examine context-dependent vocal behavior in belugas, we collected passive acoustic data and fine-scale behavioral observations for the endangered Cook Inlet beluga population. The resulting dataset includes 1,720 annotated vocalizations collected over 21 behaviorally encoded encounters. We fit generalized linear mixed models to these data to investigate the effect of behavioral state, group size, calf presence, and tidal state on (1) calling rate (number of calls/minute) and (2) call category (whistles, pulsed calls, combined calls). Belugas were more likely to call when traveling and had higher calling rates during flood tides. Group-level calling rate increased sublinearly with group size, suggesting that individuals called less in larger groups, possibly reflecting increased listening, vocal coordination, or a strategy to avoid acoustic masking. Group calling rate increased before transitions between traveling and milling, suggesting a possible link between communication and behavioral transitions. Whistles were more prevalent when traveling, while pulsed calls were more prevalent when milling. Combined calls occurred only when calves were present, indicating the importance of these calls in communication with calves. Identifying these communication patterns and the contexts in which they occur can enhance our understanding of beluga whale ecology and aid in conservation efforts via passive acoustic monitoring.

Alaska↗
USGS2022

Offspring sex ratios are male-biased reflecting sex-biased dispersal in Idaho, USA, wolves.

Offspring sex ratios can vary widely across species, and the reasons for such variation have long intrigued ecologists. For group-living animals, predicting offspring sex ratios as a function of group and environmental characteristics can be challenging. Additionally, mortality of group members can upend traditional theory used to explain offspring sex ratios observed in populations. Gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) in Idaho, USA, are an excellent study species for asking questions about offspring sex ratios given their group-living behavior and persistent exposure to human-caused mortality. I hypothesized that offspring sex ratios would be influenced by the characteristics of individuals, groups, and populations. I generated genotypes for 419 adult and 400 pup wolves during 2008–2018. There was a significant male-bias in litters of wolf pups with nearly 12% more male pups born than females. The individual, group, and population variables I considered did not have significant associations with offspring sex ratios. Local resource competition helped explain offspring sex ratios in wolves in my study system, but not local resource enhancement theory. Although female helpers have been shown to help slightly more than males, offspring sex ratios did not favor the helping sex suggesting that the overall benefit of female helpers may have been negligible in wolf groups during my study. Three wolf groups consistently overproduced males, the dispersing sex, suggesting that habitat quality was poor in their territories. The male-biased offspring sex ratios observed throughout this population reflect sex-biased dispersal in wolves in Idaho. Such a pattern suggests breeding females may be reducing local resource competition (e.g., mates and successful reproduction) by producing more males than females.

Idaho↗