Human disturbances of waterfowl: causes, effects, and management

C. E. Korschgen; R.B. Dahlgren

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 2000076

Human disturbances of waterfowl: causes, effects, and management

C. E. Korschgen·R.B. Dahlgren

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Human disturbances of waterfowl can be intentional or unintentional. They may result from overt or directed activities or may be ancillary to activities not initially thought to be of concern to birds. Some of these disturbances are manifested by alertness, fright (obvious or inapparent), flight, swimming, disablement, or death. Therefore, persons responsible for waterfowl management areas should be aware of the problems from human disturbance and should design management and facilities that increase public appreciation of waterfowl.

Explore related subjects

Fish and Wildlife Leaflet Report

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C. E. Korschgen, R.B. Dahlgren. 1992. Human disturbances of waterfowl: causes, effects, and management. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/2000076

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS1993

Life history traits and habitat needs of the redhead

Redheads are one of five common diving duck species in North America. They are in the same taxonomic group as the pochards or bay ducks and are most similar in appearance and behavior to the canvasback. Smaller body size, late breeding, wintering in southern areas, and tolerance to salt in winter and in breeding areas differentiate the redhead from the canvasback and suggest an evolutionary origin in the arid areas of the West. Parasitism of other waterfowl nests is more pronounced in redheads than in other North American waterfowl. These and other aspects of the biology of the redhead are the subject of this leaflet. Readers who are interested in general references on redheads.

Fish and Wildlife Leaflet↗

USGS1993

Increasing waterfowl nesting success on islands and peninsulas

Waterfowl that nest in uplands in the prairie pothole region have had low recruitment rates in recent decades, primarily because of predation. The loss of breeding waterfowl and their progeny has generated interest in management techniques that safeguard incubating hens and their eggs. Developing islands and peninsulas for nesting waterfowl has potential because these sites are naturally attractive to breeding ducks and geese. In fact, dense nesting colonies of ducks developed on some islands when successful females and a portion of their female progeny returned in subsequent years. Managers have successfully duplicated the beneficial attributes of islands by developing various nesting habitats that are protected by water barriers. This chapter addresses the management of existing islands, the creation of new islands, and the modification of peninsulas into islands to increase nesting success in waterfowl.

Fish and Wildlife Leaflet↗

USGS1993

Life history strategies and habitat needs of the black brant

The black brant is a sea goose that depends on coastal habitats from high arctic nesting sites in Canada, Alaska, and Russia to wintering areas in the Pacific coastal states, the Baja California peninsula, and mainland Mexico estuaries. Population estimates are based on aerial surveys in Mexico, California, Oregon, and Washington during mid-winter. Despite much annual variability in estimates, a plot of the counts from 1964 to 1992 reveals a significant downward trend in the winter populations (Fig. 1). Three of four major colonies on the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K) delta declined an average of 60% during the first half of the 1980’s. This is significant because about 79% of the world population of the black brant nest in these colonies (Table). Because few other breeding colonies have been consistently monitored, we have little understanding of their dynamics.

Fish and Wildlife Leaflet↗