Search USGSSearch

USGS · 1016312

Field soil aggregate stability kit for soil quality and rangeland health evaluations

Abstract

Soil aggregate stability is widely recognized as a key indicator of soil quality and rangeland health. However, few standard methods exist for quantifying soil stability in the field. A stability kit is described which can be inexpensively and easily assembled with minimal tools. It permits up to 18 samples to be evaluated in less than 10 min and eliminates the need for transportation, minimizing damage to soil structure. The kit consists of two 21×10.5×3.5 cm plastic boxes divided into eighteen 3.5×3.5 cm sections, eighteen 2.5-cm diameter sieves with 1.5-mm distance openings and a small spatula used for soil sampling. Soil samples are rated on a scale from one to six based on a combination of ocular observations of slaking during the first 5 min following immersion in distilled water, and the percent remaining on a 1.5-mm sieve after five dipping cycles at the end of the 5-min period. A laboratory comparison yielded a correlation between the stability class and percent aggregate stability based on oven dry weight remaining after treatment using a mechanical sieve. We have applied the method in a wide variety of agricultural and natural ecosystems throughout western North America, including northern Mexico, and have found that it is highly sensitive to differences in management and plant community composition. Although the field kit cannot replace the careful laboratory-based measurements of soil aggregate stability, it can clearly provide valuable information when these more intensive procedures are not possible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J. E. Herrick, W. G. Whitford, A. G. de Soyza, J. W. Van Zee, K. M. Havstad, C. A. Seybold, M. Walton. 2001. Field soil aggregate stability kit for soil quality and rangeland health evaluations. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0341-8162(00)00173-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Changes in microbial community and network structure precede shrub degradation in a desert ecosystem

Large-scale restoration is intended to promote ecological recovery. Improvements in plant and microbial conditions, however, may slow or even reverse in late succession. To better understand long-term restoration outcomes and underlying drivers of successional pathways, we tracked plant, bacterial and fungal, and soil conditions across a 40-year shrub plantation that was intended to stabilize desertified land in northern China. We found that planted Haloxylon ammodendron shrubs developed and then subsequently became degraded after 30–40 years. Bacterial abundance and α-diversity were much higher than those of fungi, but no significant differences in composition and structure were found in different plantation ages. In contrast, the dominant taxa of fungal communities shifted from symbiotroph and saprotroph species towards pathotroph species with increased soil nutrients in the plantation chronosequence after two decades. The changes in fungal dominant species led to a transition in microbial network structure and function, with an increase in negative linkages among taxa that began in the middle stages of succession. Changes in fungal community structure had direct and indirect negative effects on shrub leaf physiology, root activity, and biomass. Our results highlight the preceding role of a breakdown in soil microbial community composition and network structure on the degradation of shrub performance in long-term desert succession. Our study emphasizes the importance of understanding soil-microbial-plant linkages on restoration outcomes, and mechanisms that can slow or reverse the recovery of ecosystems.

Catena

Fingerprinting historical tributary contributions to floodplain sediment using bulk geochemistry

Sediment deposition on floodplains is essential for the development and maintenance of riparian ecosystems. Upstream erosion is known to influence downstream floodplain construction, but linking these disparate processes is challenging, especially over large spatial and temporal scales. Sediment fingerprinting is thus a robust tool to establish process linkages between downstream floodplain development and sediment production in distal headwater basins. Here we use sediment geochemistry to connect historical erosion in several tributaries of the Yampa River in Colorado and Wyoming, USA, to the construction of downstream floodplains on which extensive cottonwood forests established. Using a combination of conventional techniques and the relatively novel machine-learning random forest algorithm, we build multiple fingerprints of diagnostic geochemical tracers that are then input into a Bayesian mixing model to apportion provenance of floodplain sediment. Sediment samples for provenance analysis were collected from an excavated floodplain in Deerlodge Park on the Yampa River at the rooting surface of the surrounding cottonwood forest and dominantly comprised of very fine (4Φ) sand. Fingerprinting analysis of the 4Φ fraction of collected floodplain sink (n = 38) and tributary source (n = 218) samples revealed floodplain sediment to be dominantly sourced from the tributaries of Muddy Creek (45 ± 4%) and Sand Wash (42 ± 6%). Dendrochronology results moreover indicate the Deerlodge floodplain sediment was deposited in ∼1912, which falls squarely within the time (1880–1940) these tributaries were actively eroding. Taken together, study results indicate a demonstrable link between historical tributary erosion and downstream floodplain construction and concomitant forest establishment. Our findings suggest processes operating in tributary watersheds play an important role in the dynamics of large rivers and emphasize both the need for holistic, collaborative management of sediment as an essential resource and the potential to utilize sediment fingerprinting to inform and direct river ecosystem management.

Colorado, Wyoming

Characterization of vegetated and ponded wetlands with implications towards coastal wetland marsh collapse

Coastal wetlands provide numerous ecosystem services; yet these ecosystems are increasingly vulnerable to climate change stressors, especially excessive flooding from sea-level rise and storm events. This study highlights the important contribution of vegetation belowground biomass to marsh stability and identifies loss of vegetation as a critical driver of marsh collapse. We investigated the shear strength of salt marshes and unvegetated interior ponds using a modified cone penetrometer along a chronosequence of wetland marsh collapse (0 to 21 + years following pond formation) to characterize changes in the structural integrity of the marsh soil. Following conversion from vegetated marsh to open water pond, the surficial soils experienced a dramatic loss in shear strength resulting from the loss of vegetation and compaction of soil pore space. The Cone Penetrometer Testing (CPT) data indicate that higher shear strength in the surficial layers of the vegetated marsh sites were never recovered, up to 21 + years following marsh collapse. Coupled with significant elevation loss from marsh collapse, additional sea-level rise, deep subsidence, and reduced sedimentation may contribute to conditions that can exceed critical flooding thresholds, making recovery from marsh collapse difficult or impossible. Therefore, characterizing mechanisms and thresholds of marsh collapse are critical for identifying those coastal marshes that are vulnerable to collapse before conversion from vegetated marsh to open water occurs.

Louisiana