Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Research about Surtsey

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Surtsey.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Observations on the structure of Surtsey

Comparison of investigations of the 1979 and 2017 cored boreholes coupled with continued observations of the dynamic surface of Surtsey has modified our concepts of the subsurface structure of the volcano. A geometrical analysis of the 2017 vertical and inclined cores indicates that near-surface layering dips westerly, indicating that the boreholes are located inside the Surtur crater. In subaerial deposits, as well as in deep deposits below sea level and below the pre-Surtsey seafloor, there are zones of porous tuff that contain abundant pyroclasts with narrow rims of fine ash. These features, typical of near-surface deposits, could have been carried down the vent by downslumping during fluctuating explosive activity. They support the hypothesis that a broad diatreme underlies the Surtur vent. No major intrusions were encountered in the 2017 drilling except for coherent basalt in deep sub-seafloor deposits below the center of Surtur crater. The 2017 borehole temperature measurements indicate that the peak temperature in the vertical boreholes was 124 °C at 105 meters below the surface (m.b.s.) and that in the inclined hole it was 127 °C at 115 m.b.s. immediately after drilling. These peak temperatures are 72 meters apart horizontally yet closely resemble each other in shape and magnitude, suggesting a broad heat source. In addition, measurements in the inclined hole from 200 to 290 m.b.s. indicate a temperature of 60±2 °C. This is apparently residual heat from the volcanic action that created the diatreme. These facts cast doubt on the previous concept that the heat anomaly in the 1979 borehole was due to a nearby intrusion. Instead they suggest that heat would have been conducted down from the 85-meter-thick hot lava shield within the Surtur crater into a warm diatreme substrate containing original volcanic heat. As the conducted heat moved down into the water-saturated substrate it would have elevated the temperature above the boiling point curve, baked out water, and created a vapor-dominated system below sea level. Eventually loss of heat by boiling and rise of steam caused the vapor-dominated system to retreat upward. The resulting steam rose and warmed the tephra adjacent to the lava shields where it produced broad areas of palagonitized tuff.

Surtsey

Precision leveling and geodetic GPS observations performed on Surtsey between 1967 and 2002

The load on the crust from the ~ 0.8 km 3 of eruptive products of the Surtsey eruption is expected to lead to subsidence of the Surtsey island by sagging of the lithosphere, compaction of material, and slumping of the volcanic edifice. Immediately after the eruption ended in the summer of 1967 a levelling line was established across the island to monitor this expected subsidence. The line originally contained 42 benchmarks. As Surtsey is subjected to extensive erosion, in particular in the western and southern parts of the island, the western section of the line has been lost to the sea. In the year 2002 the line ended with benchmark 28. Additional benchmarks were installed 1979, 1982, 1985 and 2002, to fill in gaps in the original line and another profile was installed through the Surtur I crater. Between 1967 and 2002 levelling has been performed eleven times. One benchmark was surveyed with geodetic GPS in 1992. The benchmark was resurveyed in 2000 and 2002 and the GPS network has been extended to comprise four points. In this report we have compiled the levelling data collected on Surtsey so far. Furthermore we present coordinates for the GPS-benchmarks. Continuing subsidence of Surtsey is observed with a decaying rate. The area around the Surtur I crater is the most stable part with a subsidence rate of 0.7 cm/yr in the period 1991–2002. The largest subsidence is observed at the flanks of the island with rates up to 1.4 cm/yr. The excess rate here is most likely caused by slumping of the sides of the island.

Surtsey

Volumetric evolution of Surtsey, Iceland, from topographic maps and scanning airborne laser altimetry

The volumetric evolution of Surtsey has been estimated on the basis of digital elevation models derived from NASA scanning airborne laser altimeter surveys (20 July 1998), as well as digitized 1:5,000-scale topographic maps produced by the National Land Survey of Iceland and by Norrman. Subaerial volumes have been computed from co-registered digital elevation models (DEM's) from 6 July 1968, 11 July 1975, 16 July 1993, and 20 July 1998 (scanning airborne laser altimetry), as well as true surface area (above mean sea level). Our analysis suggests that the subaerial volume of Surtsey has been reduced from nearly 0.100 km 3 on 6 July 1968 to 0.075 km 3 on 20 July 1998. Linear regression analysis of the temporal evolution of Surtsey's subaerial volume indicates that most of its subaerial surface will be at or below mean sea-level by approximately 2100. This assumes a conservative estimate of continuation of the current pace of marine erosion and mass-wasting on the island, including the indurated core of the conduits of the Surtur I and Surtur II eruptive vents. If the conduits are relatively resistant to marine erosion they will become sea stacks after the rest of the island has become a submarine shoal, and some portions of the island could survive for centuries. The 20 July 1998 scanning laser altimeter surveys further indicate rapid enlargement of erosional canyons in the northeastern portion of the partial tephra ring associated with Surtur I. Continued airborne and eventually spaceborne topographic surveys of Surtsey are planned to refine the inter-annual change of its subaerial volume.

Surtsey

Geological monitoring of Surtsey, Iceland, 1967-1998

Aspects of the geological monitoring of the volcanic island of Surtsey 1967-1998, are described. A hydrothermal system was developed within the tephra craters in late 1966 to early 1967. Temperatures in a drill hole, situated at the eastern border of the hydrothermal area, indicate that the hydrothermal system at that site has been cooling at an average rate of ≤ 1°C per year since 1980. The tephra was altered rapidly within the hydrothermal area, producing the first visible palagonite tuff in 1969. A substantial part of the tephra pile above sea level was probably converted to tuff by 1972. The visible area of tuff has gradually increased since then, primarily due to erosion of tephra at the surface. By 1998 52% of the exposed tephra area had been converted to palagonite tuff. By volume, however, some 80-85% of the tephra pile above sea level has been converted to tuff in 1998. The area of Surtsey has shrunk from its original 2.65 km 2 (1967) to 1.47 km 2 (1998) due to marine abrasion. The geological formations on Surtsey have, however, responded quite variably to erosion. The tephra pile was easily eroded, but marine abrasion. The central core of palagonite tuff is estimated to be ≤0.39 km 2 . Statistical estimation of models of the decreases of Surtsey indicate that it will last for a long time. The numerical experiments indicate that it will take over 100 years until only the palagonite tuff core is left. It is postulated that the final remnany of Surtsey before complete destruction will be a palagonite tuff crag, comparable to those of the other islands in the Vestmannaeyjar archipelago.

Surtsey

Hydrothermal minerals and alteration rates at Surtsey volcano, Iceland

The volcanic island Surtsey, off the south coast of Iceland, was created by volcanic activity in 1963–1967. Core from a 181-m-deep hole extending 123 m below sea level shows the results of 12 yr of hydrothermal alteration of basaltic tephra. The primary cause of heating of the tephra and of development of the hydrothermal system was the intrusion of dikes below sea level. At present, the hottest part of the hole, at a maximum temperature of 150 °C, is cooling at ∼0.9 °C per year. Palagonitization of sideromelane glass, a dominant constituent of the tephra, is an important alteration process that is strongly temperature dependent, the rate doubling for every 12 °C increase. At 60 °C, <40% of the glass is palagonitized, but above 100 °C, >90% is palagonitized. Above 120 °C, olivine crystals are replaced on their edges by nontronite; the thickness of clay doubles for each 8 °C increase. Ten hydrothermal minerals have crystallized in the tephra at 25 to 150 °C; the dominant species are smectite (nontronite), analcite, phillipsite, and tobermorite. The primary clay species of palagonite is probably nontronite. Other minerals are halite, opal, calcite, chabazite, xonotlite, anhydrite, and gypsum. No major differences in mineral occurrence are noted above and below sea level, but phillipsite and tobermorite tend to grow larger below sea level, even at the same temperature. Analcite appears at lower temperature (55 °C) above sea level than below sea level (75 °C). Anhydrite is most abundant deep in the hole, where inflowing, cool sea water precipitated sulfate due to reduced sulfate solubility at higher temperatures.

Surtsey

Geothermal flux through palagonitized tephra, Surtsey, Iceland: The Surtsey temperature-data-relay experiment via Landsat-1

The net geothermal flux through palagonitized basaltic tephra rims of the Surtur I and Surtur II craters at Surtsey, Iceland, in 1972, is estimated at 780 ±325 μ cal cm -2 s -1 , indicating a decline since 1969 when a flux of 1,500 μ cal cm -2 s -1 was estimated. Heat flux in this range characterizes the postvolcanic environment on Surtsey in which the subaerial palagonitization of basaltic tephra is associated with mass transfer of hydrothermal vapor, either of meteoric or sea-water origin, only a few years after cessation of eruptive activity. The flux estimation is the result of the Surtsey data-relay experiment via Landsat-1 which was carried. out in several phases. Successful field installation and test transmissions demonstrated the feasibility of repetitive long-distance (that is, 4,800-km) data transmission and reception from a volcanic environment in Iceland via the Landsat Data Collection System. Temperature data were transmitted for a 38-day period in November and December 1972. A near-surface vertical gradient of 69.4 °C/m was obtained, suggesting a mixed mechanism of heat transfer, partitioned between conduction and convection. Comparison of four methods for estimating fluxes between 500 and 1,500 μ cal cm -2 s -1 , using temperature data derived from the Data Collection Platform, suggests that, where the only temperature available are from the surface and a depth of 1 m, methods of estimating the net geothermal flux from examination of spectral radiance are superior to methods that assume dominant convection or conduction. A computerized thermal-modeling technique to construct parametric diurnal surface-temperature curves is particularly applicable. Flux-estimation methods that assume dominant convection or conduction are limited by the lack of temperature data at greater depths and lack of knowledge of the exact energy partition.

Surtsey