Geology topics

Research about Lower Colorado River Basin

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Lower Colorado River Basin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2024

Low flows from drought and water use reduced total dissolved solids fluxes in the Lower Colorado River Basin between 1976 to 2008

Study area: We evaluated the Virgin, Verde, Salt, and Gila Rivers in the Lower Colorado River Basin. The watersheds have extents in Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, US and Sonora, MX. Study focus: We calculated trends in total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations and fluxes with the Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge and Season model. The modeling framework leverages daily streamflow and discrete water quality observations at specific monitoring sites. We evaluated trends for a common period (1976–2008) and the whole period of record at each monitoring site in terms of climate and anthropogenic controls. New hydrologic insights for the region: Three rivers had persistent TDS concentrations exceeding the EPA secondary drinking water standard. All were associated with a geologic source of TDS. We observed increases and decreases in TDS concentrations at our monitoring sites, contrasting with global freshwater salinization and declining TDS concentrations in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB). We attributed concentration variability to wintertime hydroclimatic forcing, with secondary influences of human water use. Reservoirs may decrease TDS concentrations by 50%. Efficiency improvements in irrigation and mining water uses may decrease TDS concentrations, while municipal growth increases TDS concentrations. We observed TDS flux declines at most monitoring sites. We attributed up to 85% of the TDS flux trend to changes in streamflow arising from drought and groundwater use. This study informs salinity dynamics in arid and aridifying locations, including the UCRB.

Lower Colorado River Basin↗

USGS2020

Calcite precipitation in Lake Powell reduces alkalinity and total salt loading to the Lower Colorado River Basin

Reservoirs can retain and transform carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and silica, but less is known about their effects on other biogeochemically relevant solutes. The salinization of freshwater ecosystems is a growing concern in many regions, and the role of reservoirs in salinity transport is an important research frontier. Here, we examine how a large desert southwest reservoir, Lake Powell, has altered the downstream transport of total dissolved solids (TDSs) as well as the dominant cations and anions comprising the TDS pool ( , , and Ca 2+ ). Average downstream TDS concentrations have declined significantly since river impoundment and seasonal fluctuations in TDS concentrations have become more modulated, but year to year variation in TDS concentrations has remained similar. While some of the reductions in TDS concentration can be attributed to watershed management, we find that Lake Powell retains about 10% of the TDS loaded to the system (1991 Mg TDS d −1 ). Much of this retention is occurring in the forms of calcium and bicarbonate, likely via calcite precipitation, and is equivalent to an average burial of 522 mg C m −2 d −1 , thus reducing the alkalinity of downstream water. Flow‐weighted modeling suggests that, in the absence of Lake Powell, downstream salinity limits would be surpassed at the outflow to Lake Powell 41% of the time (vs. 0% of the time currently). Understanding the dominant mechanisms regulating solute transport through the reservoir is important given the relevance for downstream drinking water and irrigation concerns, biogeochemical cycling, and the high potential for reduced flows in the future.

Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming↗

USGS2018

Key morphological features favor the success of nonnative fish species under reduced turbidity conditions in the lower Colorado River Basin

As a result of anthropomorphic alterations to the lower Colorado River basin and other southwestern rivers, water turbidity has been greatly reduced and introduced, nonnative fishes thrive in these waterways. To quantify key morphological features that may allow nonnative fishes to displace native fishes, we compared eye diameter (a proxy for visual acuity) and maximum anatomical gape (a proxy for maximum prey size) in native and nonnative fishes of the lower Colorado River basin. In general, nonnative fishes have larger eyes and larger gapes relative to native fishes. Native invertivorous and piscivorous fishes may be at a particular disadvantage when compared with nonnative species from the same trophic guild because native midwater predators have proportionally smaller eyes and mouths. In the historically turbid conditions of the Colorado River, native fish likely had a limited ability to use vision to locate prey and avoid predators. Similarly, native fishes could not identify potential food items from a distance in turbid waters so suction‐based prey capture (where the predator is in close proximity to the prey) may have been favored over ram‐based prey capture (where fish swim from a distance to overtake prey). Many nonnative fish species have a large eye diameter and maximum anatomical gape; these features likely facilitate their ability to visually identify and capture large, elusive prey. These results suggest that the large eyes and large gapes of nonnative fishes make them superior predators and competitors in the clear, anthropomorphically altered southwestern rivers of the USA.

Lower Colorado River Basin↗