Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Research about Colorado River delta

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Colorado River delta.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of restoration on plant greenness and water use in relation to drought in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta

Revitalization of the Colorado River delta riparian corridor and increasing riparian plant greenness and water use may be accomplished by added water and restoration efforts to offset declines measured since 2000 by Landsat. We use the two-band Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI2; a proxy for greenness) and evapotranspiration (ET, mm/day) using EVI2 and potential ET(ETo) from Yuma Valley. We assess if restoration with only 7.5% landcover had an impact on the unrestored reach-level landcover by measuring these two metrics, EVI2 and ET(EVI2) by comparing restored and unrestored areas. A key finding is that over 21-years EVI2 in the unrestored corridor decreased by 23.6% and ET(EVI2) decreased by 32% (0.87 mm/day). Since 2011, the unrestored reaches lost EVI2 (11%) and −0.73 mm/day ET(EVI2) (28%), but restored sites increased in EVI2 (36%) and 0.58 mm/day ET(EVI2) (20%). Water delivered to restored sites increased EVI2 by 33.6% and 1.29 mm/day ET(EVI2) (58%). EVI2 and ET(EVI2) as a function of the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index for drought periods highlight that restored and unrestored sites respond differently. Unrestored reaches are in decline; restored sites show increases in EVI2 and ET(EVI2). Restored sites do not have a significant impact on unrestored adjacent area, but smaller surface flows, a greater reliance on directed agricultural return flows, and deliveries of water to active restoration sites have revitalized habitat and increased ecosystem services in the delta.

Colorado River delta

Ecohydrological responses to surface flow across borders: Two decades of changes in vegetation greenness and water use in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River Delta

Hydrological and bioclimatic processes that lead to drought may stress plants and wildlife, restructure plant community type and architecture, increase monotypic stands and bare soils, facilitate the invasion of non‐native plant species and accelerate soil erosion. Our study focuses on the impact of a paucity of Colorado River surface flows from the United States (U.S.) to Mexico. We measured change in riparian plant greenness and water use over the past two decades using remotely sensed measurements of vegetation index (VI), evapotranspiration (ET), and a new annualized Phenology Assessment Metric (PAM) for ET. We measure these long‐term (2000‐2019) metrics and their short‐term (2014‐2019) response to an environmental, pulse flow in 2014, as prescribed under Minute 319 of the 1944 Water Treaty between the two nations. In subsequent years, small directed flows were provided to restoration areas under Minute 323. We use 250 m MODIS and 30 m Landsat imagery to evaluate three vegetation indices (NDVI, EVI, EVI2). We select EVI2 to parameterize an optical‐based ET algorithm and test the relationship between ET from Landsat and MODIS by regression approaches. Our analyses show significant decreases in VIs and ET for both the 20‐year and post‐pulse 5‐year periods. Over the last 20 years, EVI Landsat declined 34% (30% by EVI MODIS ) and ET Landsat‐EVI declined 38% (27% by ET MODIS‐EVI ), overall ca. 1.61 mmd ‐1 or 476 mmyr ‐1 drop in ET. Over the 5 years since the 2014 pulse flow, EVI Landsat declined 20% (13% by EVI MODIS ) and ET Landsat‐EVI declined 23% (4% by ET MODIS‐EVI ) with a 0.77 mmd ‐1 or a 209 mmyr ‐1 5‐year drop in ET. Data and change maps show the pulse flow contributed enough water to slow the rate of loss, but only for the very short‐term (1‐2 years). These findings are critically important as they suggest further deterioration of biodiversity, wildlife habitat and key ecosystem services due to anthropogenic diversions of water in the U.S. and Mexico and from land clearing, fires, and plant‐related drought which affect hydrological processes.

Colorado River delta