Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Research about Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah

Source-linked reports with geographic coverage including Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah.

80 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Floods of September 1970 in Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico

During September 5-7, 1970, unusually large floods occurred in the mountains of central Arizona and in the Four Corners area of Arizona, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico. Flooding also occurred in southern and northeastern Arizona. The record-high rainfall of September 5 occurred when a mass of moist tropical air from Pacific storm Norma collided with a cold front from the northwest. A new 24-hour precipitation record of 11.40 inches (290 millimeters) was established for Arizona, and new 12- and 24-hour precipitation records of 6.0 inches (152 millimeters) were established for Utah. The flood took the lives of 23 persons and was reported to have caused about $8.4 million in damage in Arizona. The main area of flooding was in the mountains in central Arizona. The flood generally was less destructive with increasing distance downstream; in the Salt and Verde River basins the reservoirs were capable of storing all the floodwater. Flooding in the Dolores and San Juan River basins in the Four Corners area was mostly in rural areas, and two people were drowned in McElmo Creek in Utah. The flood was not as large as that of October 1911, which is the largest known flood in the area. A second storm occurred in the Four Corners area September 12-14; however, the amount of flooding generally was less than that from the previous storm. Flood damage as a result of the two storms was reported to be about $2.9 million.

Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah↗

Mineralogy and geochemistry of vanadium in the Colorado Plateau

The chief domestic source of vanadium is uraniferous sandstone in the Colorado Plateau. Vanadium is 3-, 4-, or 5-valent in nature and, as oxides or combined with other elements, it forms more than 40 minerals in the Plateau ores. These ores have been studied with regard to the relative amounts of vanadium silicates and oxide-vanadates, uranium-vanadium ratios, the progressive oxidation of black low-valent ores to high-valent carnotite-type ores, and theories of origin.

Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah↗

Chemical composition as a guide to the size of sandstone-type uranium deposits in the Morrison Formation on the Colorado Plateau

The concentrations of uranium, yttrium, sodium, iron, zirconium, manganese, calcium, and nickel in 75 mill-pulp samples of uranium deposits in the Salt Wash member of the Morrison formation on the Colorado Plateau have been found, by statistical tests, to be significantly related to the size of the deposits represented by the samples. The elements mentioned above are related to the formation of the deposits in a variety of ways. Zirconium is an intrinsic element, contained principally in the detrital syngenetic fraction of the host sandstone. Calcium, manganese, and sodium are intrinsic elements contained principally in epigenetic (diagenetic) carbonate in the host sandstone. Uranium, yttrium, and nickel are principally extrinsic elements, introduced into the host sandstone by uranium mineralization or related processes. Somewhat more than half of the iron is probably intrinsic and the remainder is extrinsic. Three methods can be used to estimate the size of uranium deposits in the Salt Wash, member within broad limits. Method 1 is based on simple linear-regression theory; method 2 is based on multiple-regression theory (long method); and method 3, on multiple-regression theory (short method). For methods 1 and 2 the estimated log size of each deposit can be computed from tables showing the known concentration of uranium, yttrium, sodium, iron, zirconium, manganese, calcium, and nickel in the deposits, as determined by semiquantitative spectrographic analysis. For method 3 the estimated size or log size can be read directly from a table showing known concentration of uranium and yttrium only. About 80 percent of the tonnage-size estimates from method 1 will be within a factor of 13 (12-14) of the true sizes. The precision of the size estimates from method 2, the long multiple-regression method, is highly variable. Some estimates from method 2 will be within a factor of 12 of the true size at the 80-percent confidence level; others, within a factor of 40 at the 80-percent confidence level. About 80 percent of the tonnage-size estimates from method 3, the short multiple-regression method, will be within a factor of 15 (13-16) of the true size. A group of 40 deposits of known size was used to test the theoretical derivation of the confidence intervals given above. It was concluded from the test that the confidence intervals describe the precision of the methods correctly. The methods for estimating the size of uranium deposits are useful where the ore is poorly exposed or where an independent estimate is desired. The error of the estimates may be quite large, as indicated by the confidence limits given above; but the estimates can be used to, at least, distinguish very large from very small deposits. They also may serve to encourage or discourage further expenditures in the development and exploration of ore bodies. The methods of size estimation can be particularly useful in attempts to appraise or compare groups of deposits or mining districts, inasmuch as the average estimate of size of deposits in a group is more precise than any single estimate. The methods for estimating size are established only for deposits in the Salt Wash member of the Morrison formation. Tests indicate that the equations calculated for deposits in the Salt Wash fail completely if applied to deposits in other stratigraphic units, such as the Moss Back and Shinarump members of the Chinle formation. A further restriction, not completely evaluated at present, is that semiquantitative spectrographic analyses of mill-pulp samples are required. No tests have been made to determine the precision and accuracy of the methods when other types of samples, such as drill core, are used.

Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah↗