Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Thomas R. Villars

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas R. Villars.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Long‑term monitoring of mercury in Vermont’s forest soils: Trends over 20 years in near–surface horizons

Mercury is a soil pollutant of widespread concern, usually derived from airborne deposition. A long–term forest soil monitoring program began in 2002 at five sites (elevation 590–1140 m) in Vermont, USA. Total mercury (THg) and soil organic carbon (SOC) were assessed in the uppermost humified soil layer, either an Oa or A horizon. Sampling occurred every 5 years from ten subplots at each site. Tree species ranged from deciduous, mixed deciduous/conifer, to all conifer. After five samplings, the site means for THg ranged from 167 to 447 µg kg –1 and increased linearly with elevation ( R 2 = 0.78). One site had a significant temporal increase in THg of 3.9 µg kg –1 yr –1 ( p = 0.02). Overall SOC site means ranged from 133 to 434 g kg –1 . One site showed a significant temporal increase in SOC ( p = 0.01). The mean ratio of THg:SOC was similar at four of the sites (1318–1518 µg kg –1 ) but much lower (648 µg kg –1 ) at the site with the highest SOC and the temporal increase in THg. Within individual subplots, THg increased up to a maximum SOC concentration of ~ 320 g kg –1 and usually decreased above that threshold. Although both wet and dry mercury deposition in the northeast USA have declined, no evidence of declining soil THg concentration was found, likely due to strong retention by SOC. Continued monitoring is essential considering ongoing changes in deposition and future changes in the source–sink balance of mercury.

Vermont↗

Long-term monitoring of Vermont’s forest soils: Early trends and efforts to address innate variability

Long-term monitoring of forest soils is necessary to understand the effects of continued environmental change, including climate change, atmospheric deposition of metals, and, in many regions, recovery from acidic precipitation. A monitoring program was initiated in 2002 at five protected forest sites, primarily Spodosol soils, in Vermont, northeastern USA. Every 5 years, ten soil pits were sampled from random subplots in a 50 × 50-m plot at each site. Samples were taken by genetic horizon and, to reduce variability and improve comparability, from four specific layers: the combined Oi/Oe layer, the combined Oa/A layer, the top 10 cm of the B horizon, and 60–70 cm below the soil surface (usually the C horizon). The samples were archived and a subset analyzed for carbon, nitrogen, and exchangeable cations. After four sampling campaigns, the average coefficients of variation (CVs) at each site had a broad range, 10.7% for carbon in the Oa/A horizon to 84.3% for exchangeable Ca 2+ in the B horizon. An investigation of variability within the upper 10 cm of the B horizon across a 90-cm soil pit face showed similar CVs to the entire site, emphasizing the need for consistent and careful sampling. After 15 years, temporal trends were significant in the Oa/A and B horizons at two of the five sites, with one site showing an increase in carbon concentration in both layers along with increases in both exchangeable Ca 2+ and Al 3+ in the B horizon, perhaps linked to recovery from acidification. The monitoring program plans to continue at 5-year intervals for the next century.

Vermont↗

Methods of soil resampling to monitor changes in the chemical concentrations of forest soils

Recent soils research has shown that important chemical soil characteristics can change in less than a decade, often the result of broad environmental changes. Repeated sampling to monitor these changes in forest soils is a relatively new practice that is not well documented in the literature and has only recently been broadly embraced by the scientific community. The objective of this protocol is therefore to synthesize the latest information on methods of soil resampling in a format that can be used to design and implement a soil monitoring program. Successful monitoring of forest soils requires that a study unit be defined within an area of forested land that can be characterized with replicate sampling locations. A resampling interval of 5 years is recommended, but if monitoring is done to evaluate a specific environmental driver, the rate of change expected in that driver should be taken into consideration. Here, we show that the sampling of the profile can be done by horizon where boundaries can be clearly identified and horizons are sufficiently thick to remove soil without contamination from horizons above or below. Otherwise, sampling can be done by depth interval. Archiving of sample for future reanalysis is a key step in avoiding analytical bias and providing the opportunity for additional analyses as new questions arise.

Journal of Visualized Experiments↗