Geology topics

Steve E. Lochmann

Publications and source records attributed to Steve E. Lochmann.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2025

Multi-scale habitat characteristics influence Paleback Darter occupancy and detection probability

Objective The limited distribution of the Paleback Darter Etheostoma pallididorsum , which is often associated with dynamic headwater streams, makes the species vulnerable to changes in its environment in west-central Arkansas. A detailed understanding of habitat characteristics that support the species at multiple spatial scales is limited. This project assessed the relative influences of local- and broadscale habitat characteristics on Paleback Darter occupancy and detection probability. Methods Backpack electrofishing was performed, and a mix of in situ and remote habitat characteristics was linked to the Paleback Darter data. A single-season occupancy model was used to examine factors influencing Paleback Darter occupancy. Candidate models were ranked using Akaike's information criterion corrected for small sample sizes. Results A total of 158 Paleback Darters were collected at 13 sites during 35 of the 150 surveys. Paleback Darter occupancy and detection probability were estimated to be 0.26 (95% CI = 0.16–0.40) and 0.90 (95% CI = 0.75–0.96), respectively. Distance from springs was negatively related to Paleback Darter occupancy. Conclusions Springs appear to be a key in the Paleback Darter's life history strategy, and spring preservation is likely vital to the species’ conservation.

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society↗

USGS2025

Movements and habitat use of Silver Carp in the Arkansas and White rivers

Silver Carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix is an invasive species found throughout the Mississippi River basin. Efforts have been made to control Silver Carp populations through removal programs and movement barrier implementation. Up to date information on diel, seasonal, and annual movements and habitat use by Silver Carp will benefit these efforts. Studies of Silver Carp movement are prevalent in the upper Mississippi River, Ohio River, and tributaries, but rare in tributaries of the lower Mississippi River. Between June 2021 and May 2022, we quantified average movement rates and residency periods of 48 Silver Carp in the free-flowing lower White River and lock-and-dam fragmented lower Arkansas River using passive acoustic telemetry arrays and internal implant acoustic transmitters. We also manually tracked Silver Carp in the two rivers during the four seasons to estimate diel movement rates and use of different habitats. On an annual scale, Silver Carp in the White River moved at faster rates than Silver Carp in the Arkansas River and were recorded more times by acoustic receivers. Diel movement rates varied by season in both rivers but were low overall. Silver Carp used lentic habitats more often than lotic habitats. Overall, results suggest the numerous locks and dams of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System may limit large-scale, annual movement of Silver Carp in the Arkansas River compared to the White River. Low hourly diel movement rates and high occupancy of lentic habitats also should enable effective harvest of Silver Carp using active gears in those lentic habitats.

Arkansas↗

USGS2024

Comparison of two otolith processing methods for silver carp age estimation

Accurate age estimates are critical in the development, implementation, and assessment of silver carp ( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix ) management plans. Lapilli otoliths are the most commonly used calcified structures for silver carp age estimation, but studies on the precision of two established preparation methods [i.e., grind-and-burn (GB), thin-section (TS)] are lacking. Therefore, we assessed within-reader, between-reader, and between-method precision for 125 silver carp collected from six rivers throughout the Lower Mississippi River Basin (Arkansas, Cache, Mississippi, St. Francis, White, and Yazoo). Additionally, we compared the effort and material costs associated with each method. Overall, younger ages were estimated with the GB method (median estimated age = 6 yr, range = 3–12) than the TS method (median estimated age = 7 yr, range = 3–13). Between-method comparisons revealed low agreement (average CV = 16.40) and significant bias (Evans-Hoenig χ2 = 31.81, P < 0.01) between the two methods, particularly in older individuals. The TS method (average CV = 12.50) displayed similar between-reader precision to the GB method (average CV = 11.75). Younger age estimates for the GB method may be a result of misidentification of annuli near the otolith margin as both readers reported that TS otoliths offered clearer views than GB otoliths. Processing effort (TS method = 6.7 min otolith–1; GB method = 4.6 min otolith–1) and material costs (TS method = US$0.37 otolith–1; GB method = $0.34 otolith–1) were similar for the two methods and are likely not a factor when choosing an age estimation protocol. Our results indicate that use of the TS method for silver carp age estimation may lead to less biased age estimates, especially in established populations with greater abundances of older individuals, assuming putative additional annuli observed in thin-sections are true annuli.

Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish an↗