Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Staci Cibotti

Publications and source records attributed to Staci Cibotti.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Pyrethroid insecticides implicated in mass mortality of monarch butterflies at an overwintering site in California

Since the 1980s, monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus plexippus ) populations across North America have declined by 80–95%. Although several studies have implicated pesticides as a contributing factor to their population declines, our understanding of monarch exposure levels in nature remains limited. In January 2024, a mass mortality event near an overwintering site in Pacific Grove, California, USA, provided an opportunity to analyze dead overwintering monarch butterflies for pesticide residues. Ten recently deceased butterflies were collected and analyzed using liquid and gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS). We identified a total of 15 pesticides and associated metabolites in the butterflies, including 8 insecticides (plus 1 associated metabolite), 2 herbicides (plus 2 associated metabolites), and 2 fungicides. On average, each monarch butterfly contained 7 pesticides, excluding transformation products if the parent compound was also detected. Notably, three pyrethroid insecticides—bifenthrin, cypermethrin, and permethrin—were consistently detected at or near each chemical’s lethal dose (LD 50 ). Bifenthrin and cypermethrin were found in every sample, while permethrin was present in all but two samples. The average concentrations of these insecticides were 451.9 ng/g dry weight (dw) for bifenthrin, 646.9 ng/g dw for cypermethrin, and 337.1 ng/g dw for permethrin. These findings demonstrate pesticide contamination in monarch butterflies, including within urban areas, and highlight the risks pesticides, especially insecticides, pose to monarch populations. Additional measures may be required to safeguard this species from pesticide exposure, particularly near aggregation locations, such as overwintering sites in coastal California.

California↗

Flower plantings support wild bee reproduction and may also mitigate pesticide exposure effects

Sustainable agriculture relies on pollinators, and wild bees benefit yield of multiple crops. However, the combined exposure to pesticides and loss of flower resources, driven by agricultural intensification, contribute to declining diversity and abundance of many bee taxa. Flower plantings along the margins of agricultural fields offer diverse food resources not directly treated with pesticides. To investigate the potential of flower plantings to mitigate bee pesticide exposure effects and support bee reproduction, we selected replicated sites in intensively farmed landscapes where half contained flower plantings. We assessed solitary bee Osmia lignaria and bumble bee Bombus vosnesenskii nesting and reproduction throughout the season in these landscapes. We also quantified local and landscape flower resources and used bee-collected pollen to determine forage resource use and pesticide exposure and risk. Flower plantings, and their local flower resources, increased O. lignaria nesting probability. Bombus vosnesenskii reproduction was more strongly related to landscape than local flower resources. Bees at sites with and without flower plantings experienced similar pesticide risk, and the local flowers, alongside flowers in the landscape, were sources of pesticide exposure particularly for O. lignaria . However, local flower resources mitigated negative pesticide effects on B. vosnesenskii reproduction. Synthesis and applications . Bees in agricultural landscapes are threatened by pesticide exposure and loss of flower resources through agricultural intensification. Therefore, finding solutions to mitigate negative effects of pesticide use and flower deficiency is urgent. Our findings point towards flower plantings as a potential solution to support bee populations by mitigating pesticide exposure effects and providing key forage. Further investigation of the balance between forage benefits and added pesticide risk is needed to reveal contexts where net benefits occur.

California↗