Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Sharon Yen

Publications and source records attributed to Sharon Yen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessing direct and indirect long-term economic impacts from earthquakes to the U.S. National Bridge Inventory

Using the 2018 National Seismic Hazard Model and the 2018 National Bridge Inventory, an annualized earthquake loss (AEL) study was conducted for approximately 610,000 bridges in the conterminous United States, quantifying both direct and indirect economic losses. The typical AEL framework has been augmented with new replacement unit cost data and bridge-specific parameters for modifying default fragility curves. Earthquake hazard is defined using spectral acceleration hazard curves that account for location-specific soil conditions. Hazard is integrated with bridge-specific fragility curves to compute annual probabilities of exceeding various damage states. Further, economic loss for each bridge was estimated using the repair costs associated with specific damage states and indirect costs incurred from downtimes. Quantitative assessments of seismic risk, especially those that account for downtime-related impacts, enable us to illustrate the distribution of risk with respect to geographic region, era of construction, or type of bridge.

conterminous United States

Critical ShakeCast lifeline users and their response protocols

ShakeCast is a US Geological Survey (USGS) software application that automatically retrieves ShakeMap shaking estimates and performs analyses using fragility functions for buildings and lifelines. The ShakeCast system aims to identify which facilities or lifeline segments are most likely impacted by an earthquake—and thus which ones should be prioritized for inspection and response—and sends notifications to responders in the minutes after an event. By focusing inspection efforts on the most damage-susceptible facilities in the severely shaken areas, ShakeCast can improve critical lifeline inspection prioritization and reduce response time in the aftermath of a significant earthquake. Overviews and technical specifications of the ShakeCast system and software have been presented at earlier conferences; here we discuss ShakeCast users and their response protocols to provide further insight into the use of the ShakeCast system. We focus on case histories of ShakeCast users who are responsible for monitoring and response for critical infrastructure. We emphasize the inventory, fragility, and notification issues pertinent to these users, their efforts in developing protocols for post-earthquake inspections, and response.

Conference Paper