Geology topics

Scott P. Hansen

Publications and source records attributed to Scott P. Hansen.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2024

A comparison of survival and behavior of lake whitefish following transmitter implantation using electro- or chemical immobilization

Background The number of telemetry studies focused on lake whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis ) in the Laurentian Great Lakes has steadily increased over the last decade, but field tests of immobilization methods used for tag implantation, which have the potential to affect survival and behavior of fish after release, are lacking. We compared post-tagging survival and behavior of lake whitefish that were immobilized for tag implantation using electroimmobilization via a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit or by chemical immobilization via exposure to 10% eugenol. Results Acoustic tags were implanted into 126 adult lake whitefish ( N = 126; N = 67 TENS treatment group, N = 59 eugenol treatment group) collected from the Fox River, Wisconsin, during the spawning period in November 2021. We found no significant differences between treatments in the number of days that lake whitefish spent in the Fox River following tagging (TENS mean = 13.4 days, eugenol mean = 14.7), and also found that the proportions of fish within each treatment group that returned to the Fox River during fall 2022 (51% from TENS treatment group, 49% from eugenol treatment group) did not differ from the proportions for all fish that were confirmed to be alive at that time. The best Cormack–Jolly–Seber model indicated no differences in survival between the two treatment groups (monthly survival = 0.980, 95% CI 0.970–0.987). Fish immobilized using TENS underwent almost immediate induction and recovery from surgeries, while fish immobilized using eugenol had induction times that ranged 167–487 s (mean = 347 s) and recovery times that ranged 51–2358 s (mean = 1242 s). Conclusions Short- and long-term behavior (time to exit of Fox River, return to Fox River in the next spawning season) and monthly survival estimates of lake whitefish did not differ between the immobilization treatments. Either method may be suitable for immobilization during tag implantation, but the additional time needed for induction and recovery of fish when using eugenol may be a limiting factor in some field-based tagging situations.

Wisconsin↗

USGS2024

Comparing conventional tagging methods and acoustic telemetry to inform management of Lake Whitefish in Lake Michigan

Objective Studies of fish movement using conventional tags or acoustic telemetry have different benefits and biases that can influence how conclusions are used in a management context. Our objective was to determine whether these two methods provided similar inferences regarding movements and spawning site fidelity of Lake Whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis in Lake Michigan. Additionally, we assessed movement patterns and used telemetry to assess residency time of Lake Whitefish to provide managers with information on which stocks might be exposed to harvest in different regions. Methods Lake Whitefish were tagged during spawning in (1) North and Moonlight bays, (2) Big Bay de Noc, (3) the Menominee River, and (4) the Fox River. Proportions of fish moving between southern Green Bay, northern Green Bay, and Lake Michigan were compared between tag types. Spawning site fidelity was estimated for each tagging site. Seasonal residency indices were calculated using acoustic telemetry detections. Result Estimates differed between the two methods, but overall trends were similar. Fox River fish rarely left southern Green Bay, and fish tagged in North and Moonlight bays rarely entered Green Bay (<10% of individuals). Big Bay de Noc and Menominee River fish moved into other regions more often (>50% of individuals). The residency indices indicated that Big Bay de Noc fish spent most of their time in Lake Michigan while Menominee River fish spent little time in northern Green Bay despite transitioning to the region. Compared to telemetry, conventional tag recoveries underestimated the proportion of individuals moving among regions. Spawning site fidelity estimates (28–100%) varied among tagging groups and between methods. Conclusion Our results suggest that data from conventional tags can inform management at broad geographic scales. However, acoustic telemetry can provide fine-scale information. Information gained from telemetry can be useful in understanding exposure to fishing mortality, which may be valuable for informing management decisions.

Lake Michigan↗

USGS2022

Diet composition and overlap for adult walleye, lake whitefish, and yellow perch in Green Bay, Lake Michigan

Interspecific interactions among walleye Sander vitreus , lake whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis , and yellow perch Perca flavescens in Green Bay could influence the population status of each species, but potential trophic interactions are poorly understood. Our objectives were to determine if diet assemblages for each species and diet overlap among species varied spatially and temporally within Green Bay. Adult walleye (≥ 381 mm total length (TL); N = 981), lake whitefish (≥ 432 mm TL; N = 1507), and yellow perch (≥ 150 mm TL; N = 1174) were collected during May-October of 2018 and 2019 from multiple locations in southern and northern Green Bay. Diet assemblages of all three species varied between zones but walleye diets were more temporally variable (among months within zones and between years) than diets of lake whitefish or yellow perch. Lake whitefish represented a seasonally important prey item for walleye in southern Green Bay, composing 10% and 41% of walleye diets by weight in May and June, respectively. Yellow perch generally composed < 15% of walleye diets by weight but were consumed at a broader spatiotemporal scale than lake whitefish. Diet overlap between walleye and both lake whitefish and yellow perch was generally weak or moderate, whereas diet overlap between whitefish and perch was generally strong. Our assessment of adult trophic interactions suggests that changes in the population status of one species could influence fisheries for all three, and we identify additional research questions to address potential population-level effects of these trophic interactions.

Wisconsin↗

USGS2021

Short-term survival of lake whitefish following surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters using chemical anesthesia and electroimmobilization

The recreational, tribal, and commercial importance of lake whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis ) has prompted interest in conducting large-scale telemetry studies to evaluate movement patterns, stock structure, and spatial distribution of fish relative to fishing effort in the Laurentian Great Lakes. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the postoperative effects of intracoelomic transmitter implantation and the use of different anesthetic agents and immobilization techniques during surgery on the survival of lake whitefish. Consequently, we evaluated 48-h survival of lake whitefish following intracoelomic implantation of acoustic transmitters using chemical anesthesia (i.e., Aqui-S 20E®) and electroimmobilization through a series of field surgery trials during November 2016 and 2017. Lake whitefish were collected using electrofishing and assigned to treatment groups including: 1) a loop tag; 2) a loop tag and acoustic transmitter with no anesthesia or immobilization; 3) a loop tag and transmitter using Aqui-S 20E®; 4) a loop tag and transmitter using electroimmobilization; and 5) reference fish. In treatments involving anesthesia or immobilization, induction and recovery times were recorded, and all fish were monitored for postoperative mortality. After 48 h, all fish that underwent anesthesia or immobilization during surgery were alive, but 4 of 25 (16%) fish that underwent surgery without anesthesia or immobilization died within 48 h. Induction and recovery times were substantially shorter for fish immobilized with electricity (induction time: instantaneous; recovery time < 20 s) than for those anesthetized with Aqui-S 20E® (induction time > 200 s; recovery time > 500 s). Results indicate that survival of lake whitefish following surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters was high when surgeries were conducted with Aqui-S 20E® or electroimmobilization. Compared to using Aqui-S 20E®, electroimmobilization can provide shorter induction and recovery times and may be a preferred option for field-based tagging activities with limitations on time and fish holding capacity.

Great Lakes↗

USGS2020

Genetic structure of Smallmouth Bass in the Lake Michigan and Upper Mississippi River drainages relates to habitat, distance, and drainage boundaries: Smallmouth bass population genetic structure

Analysis of genetic connectivity helps to define stock boundaries and provides information on interpopulation dynamics, such as migration and spawning site fidelity. We used 16 microsatellite loci to describe the genetic population structure of 1,215 Smallmouth Bass Micropterus dolomieu from 32 sites throughout the upper Mississippi River and Lake Michigan watersheds. We found that Smallmouth Bass populations formed two genetically distinct units separated by the Mississippi River–Lake Michigan drainage boundary. Smallmouth Bass from the Lake Michigan drainage could be parsimoniously grouped into two or six genetically distinct units that largely corresponded with either river or lake habitats, while fish from the Mississippi River drainage grouped into two, six, or nine genetic units that were mostly associated with watershed boundaries. In the Lake Michigan and Mississippi River drainages, relative migration was limited between lake and river sites, suggesting that gene flow between neighboring sites with different habitat attributes can be low. Our research provides a higher‐resolution assessment of Smallmouth Bass genetic structure in a core portion of the species’ range and provides strong evidence that Smallmouth Bass populations are structured at small spatial scales that are potentially associated with habitat type. These results demonstrate the importance of evaluating genetic structure at small spatial scales and adopting management strategies that preserve genetic diversity of black bass populations at both the watershed level and the habitat level.

Michigan, Wisconsin↗

USGS2020

Defining the need for genetic stock assignment when describing stock demographics and dynamics: An example using Lake Whitefish in Lake Michigan

Genetic stock assignment is not routinely used when describing the dynamics and demographics of individual stocks supporting mixed-stock fisheries, and capture location and timing are often used as alternative assignment methods. However, variation in stock demographics and dynamics may not be accounted for if stock assignments based on capture location or timing do not accurately reflect genetic assignments. We used Lake Whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis in Lake Michigan as a model fishery to determine whether stock mixing could undermine efforts to describe stock status when using October capture location as a proxy for genetic stock assignment. Accuracy of stock assignments based on October capture location ranged from 54% to 100% among management zones. Metrics describing length and age distributions, weight at length, fecundity, and growth varied among genetic stocks. Stock-specific metrics were typically similar between stock assignment methods (capture location versus genetics) because only one or two genetic stocks were collected in most locations and the majority of those fish were from spatially proximal stocks with similar metrics. However, more extensive mixing of Lake Whitefish stocks has been documented; thus, using capture location for stock assignment could result in incorrect conclusions regarding stock status and harvest management depending on stock composition. Ambiguity in genetic stock assignments was a problem in two management zones, where between 23% and 42% of Lake Whitefish did not assign to a specific stock with a probability of at least 0.70. In the future, using genomic techniques rather than microsatellites may provide different conclusions regarding genetic stock structure; these differences could affect the accuracy of using capture location for stock assignment. Use of capture location as a proxy for genetic stock assignment may not be warranted for all mixed-stock fisheries but may be appropriate when stock mixing is limited or is restricted to stocks with consistently similar characteristics.

Michigan, Wisconsin↗

USGS2016

Mixed stock analysis of Lake Michigan's Lake Whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis commercial fishery

Lake whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis ) support the primary commercial fishery in Lake Michigan. Discrete genetic stocks of lake whitefish have been identified and tagging data suggest stocks are mixed throughout much of the year. Our objectives were to determine if (1) differential stock harvest occurs in the commercial catch, (2) spatial differences in genetic composition of harvested fish were present, and (3) seasonal differences were present in the harvest by commercial fisheries that operate in management zones WI-2 and WFM-01 (Green Bay, Lake Michigan). Mixed stock analysis was conducted on 17 commercial harvest samples (n = 78–145/sample) collected from various ports lake-wide during 2009–2010. Results showed significant mixing with variability in stock composition across most samples. Samples consisted of two to four genetic stocks each accounting for ≥ 10% the catch. In 10 of 17 samples, the stock contributing the largest proportion made up < 60% of the harvest. In general, seasonal and annual differences existed in the proportional stock contribution at a single capture location. Samples from Wisconsin's primary commercial fishing management zone (WI-2) were composed predominately of fish from the Big Bay de Noc (Michigan) stock as opposed to the geographically proximate, North–Moonlight Bay (Wisconsin) stock. These findings have implications for management and allocation of fish to various quotas. Specifically, geographic location of harvest, the current means of allocating harvest quotas, is not the best predictor of genetic stock harvest.

Lake Michigan↗

USGS2003

Lead fishing weights and other fishing tackle in selected waterbirds

From 1995 through 1999, 2,240 individuals of 28 species of waterbirds were examined in the United States for ingested lead fishing weights. A combination of radiography and visual examination of stomachs was used to search for lead weights and blood and liver samples from live birds and carcasses, respectively, were collected for lead analysis. Ingested lead weights were found most frequently in the Common Loon ( Gavia immer ) (11 of 313 = 3.5%) and Brown Pelican ( Pelecanus occidentalis ) (10 of 365 = 2.7%), but also in one of 81 (1.2%) Double-crested Cormorants ( Phalacrocorax auritus ) and one of 11 (9.1%) Black-crowned Night Herons ( Nycticorax nycticorax ). Birds with ingested lead fishing weights (including split shot, jig heads, and egg, bell, and pyramid sinkers) were found in California, Florida, Maine, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. The size and mass of ingested lead weights ranged from split shot of 7 mm in the longest dimension, weighing less than 2 g, to a 22 × 39 mm pyramid sinker that weighed 78.2 g. Six ingested lead weights were more than 25.4 mm in the longest dimension. Lead concentrations in the blood and liver of birds with lead fishing weights in their stomachs ranged up to 13.9 ppm and 26.0 ppm (wet weight basis), respectively. During the study, we also noted the presence of ingested or entangled fishing tackle, with no associated lead weights, in eight species.

Waterbirds↗

USGS2001

Size characteristics of stones ingested by common loons

Common Loon (Gavia immer) carcasses recovered in New England had more stones of greater combined mass in their stomachs than loons from the southeastern United States. Stones retained in sieves with mesh sizes between 4.75 and 8.00 mm accounted for the greatest percentage (by mass) of grit in loon stomachs. The median longest dimension of the largest single stone in each stomach was 12.5 mm in loons from New England and 10.7 mm in loons from the southeast (maximum = 23.1 mm and 16.8 mm, respectively). A recent national proposal to restrict the use of certain fishing weights in the United States called for a ban on lead fishing sinkers of 25.4 mm or less in any dimension. Our findings suggest it is unlikely that Common Loons would ingest lead fishing weights greater than 25.4 mm in any dimension, if such ingestion was solely the result of their search for replacement stones for their stomachs. However, this does not preclude the possibility that loons may ingest larger fishing weights under other circumstances, such as the consumption of fish with attached sinkers.

Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, New Ha↗

USGS2001

Size and mass of grit in gizzards of sandhill cranes, tundra swans, and mute swans

Because it has been suggested that waterbirds may ingest lost or discarded lead fishing weights as grit, we examined grit in the gizzards of Sandhill Cranes ( Grus canadensis ), Tundra Swans ( Cygnus columbianus ), and Mute Swans ( Cygnus olor ), three species where individuals have been poisoned by the ingestion of lead fishing weights. The greatest proportion (by mass) of grit in gizzards of Sandhill Cranes consisted of particles with a minimum dimension of 2.36-4.75 mm. Grit particles in swans were much smaller, with the most prevalent (by mass) being 0.6-1.18 mm. The greatest dimension of the largest grit particle found in cranes and swans was 17.4 mm and 14.0 mm, respectively. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a ban on lead fishing weights of ≤25.4 mm in any dimension. Based on the size of grit particles that we found in gizzards of Sandhill Cranes, Mute Swans, and Tundra Swans, we believe it is unlikely that individuals of those species would ingest, as grit, lead fishing weights larger than 25.4 mm in any dimension.

Arizona, Maryland, Nebraska, New Mexico, Utah↗