Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Robert L. Carruth

Publications and source records attributed to Robert L. Carruth.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Groundwater conditions and trends, 2009–19, Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

Groundwater is the primary source of municipal water for Saipan. Nearly all groundwater for the municipal water supply is withdrawn from a freshwater-lens system with a limited amount of freshwater that is susceptible to saltwater intrusion. The status of Saipan’s groundwater resources has not been thoroughly assessed since 2003. The U.S. Geological Survey—in cooperation with the Office of Grants Management, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and in collaboration with the Commonwealth Utilities Corporation—assessed the status and characteristics of Saipan’s groundwater resources by (1) evaluating groundwater withdrawals from municipal production wells during 2014–19, (2) evaluating chloride concentrations of municipal groundwater withdrawals during 2009–19, and (3) collecting salinity profiles at selected groundwater-monitoring wells during 2018–19. At the time of preparation of this report (2019), the periods of groundwater-withdrawal and chloride-concentration data represent the only periods of data available since 2003. During 2014–19, groundwater for the municipal water supply was withdrawn from about 143 production wells. Most of the wells are drilled into limestone formations in the southern plateau and the Kagman Peninsula and generally have withdrawal rates of about 40–60 gallons per minute. Records of monthly groundwater withdrawals from municipal production wells were available for May 2014–March 2019; during that period, monthly withdrawals ranged from 5.7 to 12.8 million gallons per day (Mgal/d) and averaged 9.3 Mgal/d, although records were unavailable for 9 months (May 2015–January 2016). Private wells, mainly located on the western coastal plain, currently are permitted to withdraw a total of about 7 Mgal/d of groundwater. Actual groundwater withdrawals from private wells, however, are uncertain because withdrawal records for private wells are not available. The Commonwealth Utilities Corporation measured the chloride concentration of groundwater pumped from each of its production wells about twice a year from 2009–19; during this period, 146 production wells were active and sampled. Only 32 of the 146 (22 percent) municipal production wells had median chloride concentrations less than or equal to 250 milligrams per liter (mg/L), the secondary drinking water standard set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Eighty-one wells (55 percent) pumped water with median chloride concentrations above 500 mg/L. The Mann-Kendall test was used to determine if chloride concentrations of groundwater withdrawals at 146 municipal production wells had statistically significant trends during December 2009–February 2019. Trends were considered statistically significant for probability values (p-values) less than or equal to 0.05. Test results indicate an upward trend at 9 wells, a downward trend at 52 wells, and no trend at 85 wells. Salinity profiles were measured in 12 selected monitor wells during July–August 2018 and were measured in six of the twelve selected monitor wells during March 2019. The salinity profiles were used to estimate the thickness of the freshwater lens at 10 monitor wells; freshwater-lens thickness was greatest (46 ft) in a monitor well in the Dan Dan well field near the northern part of the southern plateau. Freshwater-lens-thickness estimates elsewhere were (1) between 0 and 28 ft for the remaining monitor wells on the southern plateau, (2) between 19 and 21 ft for monitor wells on the Kagman Peninsula, (3) 2 ft for a monitor well in the Sablan Quarry well field on west-central Saipan, and (4) 8 ft for a monitor well in the Marpi Quarry well field on northern Saipan.

Commonwealth of the Norhtern Marianas Islands, Sai

Procedures for field data collection, processing, quality assurance and quality control, and archiving of relative- and absolute-gravity surveys

Repeat microgravity surveys carried out using relative- and absolute-gravity meters are useful for identifying changes in subsurface mass, such as the volume of water stored in an aquifer. These surveys require careful field procedures to achieve the part-per-billion accuracy required to measure the small changes in gravity relevant for hydrologic studies. This chapter describes techniques and methods for carrying out gravity surveys, requirements for assuring high-quality survey results, and data processing and archival procedures. The focus is on acquiring and documenting repeat gravity surveys for monitoring changes in groundwater storage. Similar gravity surveys may be completed to evaluate other causes of mass change, such as those caused by magma movement below volcanoes. The methods are also useful for one-time surveys that map spatial gravity variations associated with geologic structures such as faults or sedimentary basins. Repeat microgravity surveys can be carried out using relative-gravity meters, absolute-gravity meters, or both. Specific locations, known as gravity stations, are visited during each survey. Most commonly, absolute- and relative-gravity are combined using the least-squares method of network adjustment, much like benchmark elevations and relative-height differences in a leveling network. This chapter primarily describes the use of the A-10 absolute-gravity meter manufactured by Micro-g LaCoste, Inc., and relative-gravity meters made by LaCoste & Romberg (no longer in production) and ZLS Corporation, Inc. Field and office procedures are similar for other instruments such as the FG-5 absolute-gravity meter and Scintrex relative-gravity meters, but some adaptation may be required. Quality control for absolute-gravity data focuses primarily on proper field procedures and maintaining the time and distance calibration of the instrument. Quality control for relative-gravity surveys requires careful field procedures, an understanding of how the meter is behaving while in the field, and appropriate postprocessing. The techniques and methods described in this chapter were developed over 30 years at the USGS Arizona Water Science Center and the Southwest Gravity Program and are the basis for many studies on groundwater-storage change and geologic structure. A description of the Program and complete bibliography is available at https://www.usgs.gov/centers/az-water/science/azwsc-capabilities-hydrologic-gravity-monitoring .

Techniques and Methods

Groundwater-storage change and land-surface elevation change in Tucson Basin and Avra Valley, south-central Arizona--2003-2016

The U.S. Geological Survey monitors groundwater-storage change and land-surface elevation change caused by groundwater withdrawal in Tucson Basin and Avra Valley—the two most populated alluvial basins within the Tucson Active Management Area. The Tucson Active Management Area is one of five active management areas in Arizona established by the 1980 Groundwater Management Act and governed by the Arizona Department of Water Resources. Gravity and land-surface elevation change were monitored every 1 to 3 years at wells and benchmarks in Tucson Basin and Avra Valley from 2003 to 2016. Monitoring resulted in estimates of land-surface elevation change and groundwater-storage change. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) interferograms showing land-surface elevation change were constructed for the Tucson metropolitan area from (1) May 2003 to July 2006, (2) July 2006 to June 2008, (3) June 2008 to April 2011, (4) April 2011 to November 2014, and (5) November 2014 to March 2016. For the Tucson metropolitan area, maximum subsidence of about 2 inches occurred during May 2003 to July 2006. From July 2006 to June 2008, maximum subsidence of approximately 0.8 inches occurred in two regions in the Tucson metropolitan area. From June 2008 to April 2011, about 0.8 inches of subsidence also occurred in two regions. Additionally, for the period April 2011 to November 2014, a maximum of about 0.9 inches of subsidence occurred in the same two regions of Tucson Basin. For the entire monitoring period from May 2003 to March 2016, maximum subsidence of as much as 5.3 inches occurred in the Tucson metropolitan area south of Irvington Road between south 12th Avenue and south Park Avenue, and as much as 4 inches in central Tucson south of Broadway between Country Club Road and Craycroft Road. The InSAR data indicated that there was no significant land-surface deformation from 2003 to 2016 in Avra Valley, and no change in either basin from 2014 to 2016. The volume of stored groundwater in the monitored part of Tucson Basin showed net zero change from spring 2003 to summer 2006. From summer 2006 to summer 2008 the volume of stored groundwater in the monitored part of Tucson Basin increased approximately 50,000 acre-feet; however, overdraft conditions resumed from summer 2008 to spring 2011, resulting in decreased storage of approximately 178,000 acre-feet. From spring 2011 to fall 2014, the volume of stored groundwater in Tucson Basin decreased about 200,000 acre-feet, following a period of lower than average rainfall in 2012 and 2013. The volume of stored groundwater in the monitored part of Tucson Basin increased approximately 167,000 acre-feet from fall 2014 to spring 2016. Groundwater storage in Avra Valley increased during the entire monitoring period from spring 2003 to spring 2016, largely as a result of managed recharge of Central Arizona Project water in the monitored region. From 2003 to 2016, artificial recharge in Avra Valley totaled approximately 1,788,000 acre-feet, and in Tucson Basin artificial recharge for the entire period was about 636,790 acre-feet. Artificial recharge exceeded pumping in Avra Valley for each time interval. Pumping in Tucson Basin exceeded artificial recharge for every period except 2014 to 2016. Overall, long-term water-level declines have stabilized or reversed since 2000 at most areas in Tucson Basin and Avra Valley.

Arizona