Geology topics

Pieter-Ewald Share

Publications and source records attributed to Pieter-Ewald Share.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

The Cascadia Region Earthquake Science Center (CRESCENT): Advancing understanding of Cascadia's earthquake hazards

The Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) is capable of producing large megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis, posing significant risks to the Pacific Northwest. This paper examines the seismic characteristics of the CSZ, including its offshore coupling, sparse seismicity, and a complex paleoseismic record. While recent advances in geophysical methods and data collection have improved our understanding of subduction zone processes, important uncertainties remain regarding rupture dynamics, ground shaking, and tsunami impacts. The Cascadia Region Earthquake Science Center (CRESCENT) has been established to address these challenges through coordinated research, education, and community engagement. By integrating scientific studies, fostering collaboration, and leveraging new technologies, CRESCENT seeks to improve hazard assessment and resilience in the region. This paper outlines the primary challenges and opportunities in advancing subduction zone science and enhancing societal preparedness for future CSZ events.

California, Oregon, Washington↗

USGS2026

Cascadia Subduction Zone science: Call for the next generation community seismic velocity model

The Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ) hosts major seismic and tsunami hazards, yet key questions persist about the relationship between margin structure, fluid distribution, episodic tremor and slip, shallow megathrust behavior, shaking and tsunamigenesis, and the resulting hazard estimates. Addressing these problems requires an empirically grounded, three‐dimensional seismic velocity model to illuminate subsurface structure and properties and to provide a basis for geophysical studies such as earthquake simulations and ground‐motion estimation. In May 2024, the National Science Foundation‐funded Cascadia Region Earthquake Science Center (CRESCENT) community velocity model (CVM) working group, with U.S. Geological Survey and regional partners, convened a workshop to identify priorities for such a model. Participants emphasized the features necessary for addressing key science questions, including implementing findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) access, capturing along‐strike and along‐dip structural heterogeneity, resolving shallow offshore–onshore structure, constraining elastic properties and quantifying their uncertainties for numerical wave propagation simulations, their validation benchmarks, and supporting associated accurate earthquake ground‐motion simulations and hazard assessments. This article describes the priorities defined in the workshop, and a description of how, guided by these needs, CRESCENT plans to develop multiple generations of a CVM to advance CSZ science and improve seismic and tsunami hazard modeling across the Pacific Northwest. The CVM will span the CSZ from the surface to ∼100 km depth, offshore and east of the Cascades into Idaho (∼132°–110° W) and the southern and northern tectonic regime transitions (∼36°–52° N) to capture the entire tectonic system as well as its surroundings.

Cascadia Subduction Zone↗

USGS2022

Structural properties of the Southern San Andreas fault zone in northern Coachella Valley from magnetotelluric imaging

The Southern San Andreas fault (SSAF) poses one of the largest seismic risks in California. Yet, there is much ambiguity regarding its deeper structural properties around Coachella Valley, in large part due to the relative paucity of everyday seismicity. Here, we image a multistranded section of the SSAF using a non-seismic method, namely magnetotelluric (MT) soundings, to help inform depth-dependent fault zone geometry, fluid content and porosity. The acquired MT data and resultant inversion models highlight a conductive column encompassing the SSAF zone that includes a 2–3 km wide vertical to steeply northeast dipping conductor down to ∼4 km depth (maximum of ∼1 Ω·m at 2 km depth) and another prominent conductor in the ductile crust (∼1 Ω·m at 12 km depth and slightly southwest of the surface SSAF). We estimate porosities of 18–44 per cent for the conductive uppermost 500 m, a 10–15 per cent porosity at 2 km depth and that small amounts (0.1–3 per cent) of interconnected hypersaline fluids produce the deeper conductor. Located northeast of this conductive region is mostly resistive crust indicating dry crystalline rock that extends down to ∼20 km in places. Most of the local seismicity is associated with this resistive region. Located farther northeast still is a conductive region at >13 km depth and separate from the one to the southwest. The imaged anomalies permit two interpretations. The SSAF zone is vertical to steeply northeast dipping in the upper crust and (1) is near vertical at greater depth creating mostly an impermeable barrier for northeast fluid migration or (2) continues to dip northeast but is relatively dry and resistive up to ∼13 km depth where it manifests as a secondary deep ductile crustal conductor. Taken together with existing knowledge, the first interpretation is more likely but more MT investigations are required.

California↗