Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Paige A. C. Maskill

Publications and source records attributed to Paige A. C. Maskill.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accuracy of histology, endoscopy, ultrasonography, and plasma sex steroids in describing the population reproductive structure of hatchery-origin and wild white sturgeon

Hatchery-origin white sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus in the lower Columbia River, Canada are approaching puberty, and describing the reproductive structure of the population is critical to determine if they are capable of contributing to spawning events in the wild, a key management uncertainty. Few studies have compared the accuracy of available tools (histology, ultrasound, endoscopy, and plasma sex steroids) used to assign sex and stage of maturity within the same population of prepubertal and post-pubertal sturgeon. Population reproductive structure was described using these tools in 332 hatchery-origin and 75 wild individuals over 2 years (2017 and 2018). True sex was determined using histological analysis of gonadal tissue, which is 100% accurate at assigning sex and stage of maturity in fish when germ cells are present in the biopsy. All hatchery-origin fish assessed had not reached puberty and were pre-meiotic males ( n = 158) or pre-vitellogenic females ( n = 174). Assignment of true sex using histology was 97% in hatchery-origin and 94% in wild fish as several biopsies did not contain germ cells. Fish with gonadal biopsies that did not contain germ cells and intersex fish ( n = 3) were not included in further analyses of other tools. Accuracy in assigning sex to both the hatchery-origin (98%) and wild (100%) fish was highest using endoscopy (an otoscope). The other tools evaluated were less accurate, with 69% accuracy in hatchery-origin and 74% accuracy in wild fish for plasma sex steroids and 57% accuracy in hatchery-origin and 70% accuracy in wild fish for ultrasonography. Based on these results, endoscopy was the most reliable tool for assigning sex in both prepubertal and post-pubertal fish and can be easily complimented with histology when determining stage of maturity or describing population reproductive structure.

British Columbia, Washington

A paradoxical knowledge gap in science for critically endangered fishes and game fishes during the sixth mass extinction

Despite unprecedented scientific productivity, Earth is undergoing a sixth mass extinction. The disconnect between scientific output and species conservation may be related to scientists studying the wrong species. Given fishes have a high extinction rate, we assessed the paradox between scientific productivity and science needed for conservation by comparing scientific output created for critically endangered fishes and game fishes. We searched 197,866 articles (1964 – 2018) in 112 journals for articles on 460 critically endangered fishes, 297 game fishes, and 35 fishes classified as critically endangered and game fish — our analysis included freshwater and marine species. Only 3% of the articles in the final database were on critically endangered fishes; 82% of critically endangered fishes had zero articles. The difference between the number of articles on game fishes and critically endangered fishes increased temporally with more articles on game fishes during the extinction crisis. Countries with 10 or more critically endangered fishes averaged only 17 articles from 1964 through 2018. Countries with the most critically endangered fishes are most in need of science. More scientific knowledge is needed on critically endangered fishes to meet the challenges of conserving fishes during the sixth mass extinction.

Scientific Reports