Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Namjeong Choi

Publications and source records attributed to Namjeong Choi.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Water-budget simulations for selected watersheds in Cameron County, Texas, 2022–23

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the City of Brownsville, Texas, configured and calibrated a set of hydrologic models for a 217-square-mile study area in Cameron County in south Texas during 2022–23. The models were used for estimating runoff and quantities of water diverted from the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo del Norte (hereinafter referred to as the “Rio Grande”) to maintain water-surface elevations in the canals and resacas (former distributary channels cut off from the main channel of the Rio Grande). Resacas provide habitat to aquatic species and help reduce the effects of flooding. Because of the large size of the study area and diversity of hydrologic conditions, the study area was divided into 11 watersheds, and separate hydrologic models were developed for 9 of the watersheds. Six of the nine modeled watersheds are drained mostly by canals (canal watersheds), and three of the modeled watersheds drain to resacas (resaca watersheds). The Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN was selected for modeling the study area watersheds because it is flexible in simulating a wide variety of watershed conditions. The models were calibrated with streamflow data collected during 2022–23. The calibrated models were used to simulate water budgets (streamflow, evapotranspiration, water-storage volumes, and water diversions and withdrawals) during 2022–23. Model simulations showed that the resaca watersheds required more diversions from the Rio Grande and released less runoff than did the canal watersheds. Management practices maintaining resaca water levels constrained their runoff.

Texas

Water-budget analysis of the Medina and Diversion Lake system, with estimated recharge to the Edwards aquifer and the upper zone of the Trinity aquifer, Bandera, Bexar, and Medina Counties, Texas, 1955–2022

The U.S. Geological Survey—in cooperation with the San Antonio Water System and the Edwards Aquifer Authority—used data collected during four different periods (March 1955–August 1964, October 1995–September 1996, March 2001–June 2002, and March 2017–October 2022) as part of a new study to refine previously derived relations between the altitude of the water surface of Medina Lake and recharge to the Edwards aquifer and the upper zone of the Trinity aquifer in the form of seepage losses from Medina Lake and the immediately downstream Diversion Lake. Any seepage losses that occur within the conservation pools of Medina and Diversion Lakes infiltrate the Edwards aquifer and the upper zone of the Trinity aquifer as recharge. To quantify recharge to the Edwards aquifer and the upper zone of the Trinity aquifer from Medina and Diversion Lakes, daily water budgets were used to calculate monthly and annual recharge (method 1). A new statistical analysis culminated in a new log-log weighted least-squares (WLS) regression equation that relates recharge from Medina and Diversion Lakes to the Medina Lake stage. Recharge estimates obtained by using the new log-log WLS regression equation (method 2), as well as the recharge estimated by using a method published in 1978 (referred to as the “Puente method”) (method 3), were compared with the calculated recharge during March 2017–September 2022. During March 2017–September 2022, the WLS estimated recharge was 224,310 acre-feet, 0.5 percent less than the calculated recharge of 225,400 acre-feet. The Puente method estimated recharge was 342,080 acre-feet, about 52 percent more than the calculated recharge. The analysis of the three methods indicates that WLS estimated recharge provides a more accurate accounting of actual recharge to the Edwards aquifer and the upper zone of the Trinity aquifer compared to the Puente method.

Texas

Flood warning toolset for the Sabinal River near Utopia, Texas

Introduction Floods are one of the most frequent and expensive natural disasters that occur across the United States. Rapid, high-water events that occur in local areas—flash floods—are especially difficult for emergency managers to predict and provide advance warning to the public, and insufficient data can hamper postflood recovery efforts. Central Texas is hilly, and it is known as a “flash flood alley” because of its high-intensity rains, shallow soils, and steep terrain, all of which combined can result in loss of life and property damage. For example, the flash flood event during July 2002 claimed 12 lives in central Texas, including 1 in the town of Utopia, which is on the east bank of the Sabinal River in a flash-flood-prone area along the Balcones Escarpment. During the flood event, the peak discharge recorded on July 5, 2002, at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage 08198000 Sabinal River near Sabinal, Tex. (hereinafter referred to as the “Sabinal gage”), was 108,000 cubic feet per second (corresponding to a stream stage [also called gage height] of 33.74 feet). To put the 2002 flood into context, during a typical year the median daily discharge in the Sabinal River at the Sabinal gage is only about 23 cubic feet per second. In 2021, the USGS, in cooperation with the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Texas Water Development Board, developed a flood warning toolset for the Sabinal River near Utopia. This study builds on earlier USGS flood work on the Medina River in Bandera County. The newly developed toolset consists of a newly installed USGS streamgage to collect continuous stream stage data (streamgage 08197970 Sabinal River at Utopia, Tex.; hereinafter referred to as the “Utopia gage”) 13 miles upstream from the Sabinal gage, a hydraulic model developed for the Sabinal River near Utopia, and an online library of digital flood-inundation maps referenced to the stream stage at the Utopia gage.

Texas

Flood-inundation maps created using a synthetic rating curve for a 10-mile reach of the Sabinal River and a 7-mile reach of the West Sabinal River near Utopia, Texas, 2021

In 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Texas Water Development Board, studied floods to produce a library of flood-inundation maps for the Sabinal River near Utopia, Texas. Digital flood-inundation maps were created for a 10-mile reach of the Sabinal River from USGS streamgage 08197936 Sabinal River below Mill Creek near Vanderpool, Tex., at the upstream boundary of the study reach, to USGS streamgage 08197970 Sabinal River at Utopia, Tex. (hereinafter referred to as the “Utopia gage”), at the downstream boundary of the study reach, and for a 7-mile reach of the West Sabinal River. The flood-inundation maps depict estimates of the areal extent and depth of flooding corresponding to selected gage heights (the water-surface elevation at a streamgage, commonly referred to as “stage”) at the Utopia gage. Water-surface elevations were computed for the stream reach by means of a two-dimensional unsteady-state diffusion wave model with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System program. A synthetic stage-discharge rating curve at the Utopia gage was developed using a regional regression equation to construct the model boundary condition inputs, and the upper bound of the stage-discharge relation was matched to a major flood event in July 2002. The hydraulic model was used to compute water-surface elevations for 35 stages at 0.5-foot (ft) increments referenced to the Utopia gage datum and ranging from 11 ft (near bankfull) to 28 ft (estimated peak stage during the July 2002 flood event). These flood-inundation maps, in conjunction with the real-time stage data from the Utopia gage, are intended to help guide the public in taking individual safety precautions and provide emergency management personnel with a tool to efficiently manage emergency flood operations and postflood recovery efforts.

Texas

Component 1: Data and monitoring gap analysis

The goal of Component 1 is to identify available data and data gaps in the Texas coastal region and to establish a plan for obtaining data critical for successful coastal flood analysis in these regions. This component is supporting the expansion and improvement of data observations for inland, coastal, and ocean systems.

Texas

Flood warning toolset for the Medina River in Bandera County, Texas

Overview Floods are the most common natural disaster in the United States. The Medina River in Bandera County, Texas, is in the Edwards Plateau, where high-intensity rain rates and steep terrain frequently contribute to severe flash flooding capable of causing loss of life and property. For example, the July 5, 2002, flood claimed a total of 12 lives in the central Texas area. The estimated peak discharge during this flood at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow-gaging station 08178880 Medina River at Bandera, Tex., was 159,000 cubic feet per second (corresponding to a stage or gage height of 38.91 feet), causing significant flooding in Bandera near Mud Creek and farther downstream. In 2018, the USGS, in cooperation with the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Texas Water Development Board, developed a flood early-warning toolset to enhance the communication of flood risk and provide emergency management with additional information to improve flood response and mitigation. This toolset consists of a continuous streamflow-gage monitoring network, a well-calibrated hydraulic model of the Medina River, and a flood-inundation mapper application for the study area. A library of flood-inundation maps tied to the National Weather Service river stage forecast capability is included with the toolset.

Texas

Flood-inundation maps for a 23-mile reach of the Medina River at Bandera, Texas, 2018

In 2018, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Bandera County River Authority and Groundwater District and the Texas Water Development Board, studied floods through the period of record to create a library of flood-inundation maps for the Medina River at Bandera, Texas. Digital flood-inundation maps for a 23-mile reach of the Medina River at and near Bandera, from the confluence with Winans Creek to English Crossing Road, were developed. The flood-inundation maps depict estimates of the areal extent and depth of flooding corresponding to a range of different gage heights (gage height is commonly referred to as “stage,” or the water-surface elevation at a streamflow-gaging station) at USGS streamflow-gaging station 08178880 Medina River at Bandera, Tex. (hereinafter referred to as the “Bandera station”). Water-surface profiles were computed for the stream reach by means of a one-dimensional step-backwater model. The stage-discharge (streamflow) relation effective in 2018 was used to calibrate the model, and stages from four recent flood events were used to independently validate the model. The calibrated hydraulic model was then used to compute 29 water-surface profiles for stages at 1-foot (ft) increments referenced to the station datum and ranging from 10 ft (near bankfull) to 38 ft, which exceeds the major flood stage of the National Weather Service Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service of 24 ft. The simulated water-surface profiles were then combined with a geographic information system digital elevation model (derived from light detection and ranging data having a 0.4-ft vertical accuracy and 1.6-ft horizontal resolution) to delineate the area flooded for stages ranging from 10 to 38 ft. The digital flood-inundation maps are delivered through the USGS Flood Inundation Mapper application that presents map libraries and provides detailed information on flood-inundation extents and stages for modeled sites. The flood-inundation maps developed in this study, in conjunction with the real-time stage data from the Bandera station, are intended to help guide the public in taking individual safety precautions and provide emergency management personnel with a tool to efficiently manage emergency flood operations and post-flood recovery efforts.

Scientific Investigations Report