Geology topics

Matthew P. Fairchild

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew P. Fairchild.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

Effect of rotenone treatment on alpine stream invertebratecommunities in Colorado

Objective: Introduction of non-native salmonids to western United States streams has resulted in extirpation and even extinction of native cutthroat trout. Once thought to be extinct, a genetically verified population of Greenback Cutthroat Trout (GBCT) Oncorhynchus virginalis stomias was identified and used for population re-establishment efforts. To restore native trout habitat, stream reaches above a dispersal barrier are typically treated with a piscicide (i.e., rotenone) to remove non-native trout before reintroduction of natives. One concern with this method is the possible impact to non-target invertebrates, which are an important food source for trout, and a drastic disturbance to invertebrates following rotenone treatment could negatively affect native trout establishment. Methods: Two alpine streams were treated with liquid rotenone via drip stations during two consecutive days. Invertebrate communities were sampled for six years in two streams where GBCT was reintroduced. Pre- and posttreatment sampling allowed for examination of short-term, intermediate, and long-term responses to invertebrate communities. Results: Negative short-term responses were detected for total taxa richness, EPT richness, and percent Heptageniidae density immediately following rotenone application. However, most community metrics returned to pretreatment values within 1 to 2 years posttreatment. Invertebrate community changes between pretreatment and 3 to 5 years posttreatment were observed with increased percent Chironomidae density and decreased percent EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) density. Conclusion: This study provides insight into invertebrate community response to rotenone treatment in high alpine streams and adds to the current literature which displays short-term declines in invertebrates following rotenone and recovery of most aspects of the initial invertebrate community within one year posttreatment. Lay Summary Rotenone application for cutthroat trout habitat restoration negatively affected invertebrate communities in the 1 to 2 months following treatment; however, most community values recovered to pretreatment levels within 1 to 2 years. Keywords: native fish, cutthroat trout, fish management, invertebrate community, habitat restoration

Colorado↗

USGS2025

Riverscape genetics of nonnative Brook Trout to inform native cutthroat trout conservation

Objective Understanding how riverscape features influence gene flow is critical for managing population connectivity in freshwater species. We examined how landscape and stream characteristics shape the spatial genetic structure of nonnative Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis in a headwater stream network proposed for reintroduction of federally threatened Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus virginalis stomias . Brook Trout were studied to evaluate the suitability of this habitat for supporting a native trout metapopulation. Methods We genotyped 757 Brook Trout from 22 sites across a 60-km stream network using 12 microsatellite loci. Spatial genetic structure was assessed using clustering analysis (program STRUCTURE) and pairwise differentiation metrics ( F ST and Jost’s D ). A spatial network modeling approach was used to quantify the effects of riverscape features (e.g., stream gradient, stream order, waterfalls, and flow direction) on trout gene flow. Results Genetic clustering identified four distinct tributary groups, while estimates of pairwise genetic differentiation indicated some genetic connectivity across the network (mean F ST = 0.04; mean Jost’s D = 0.06). Trout gene flow was impeded by waterfalls, steep stream gradients, and increased hydrologic distance. Higher stream order and downstream flow direction were associated with stronger gene flow, and stream segments containing waterfalls and steeper gradients showed greater asymmetries between upstream and downstream gene flow. Conclusions Brook Trout populations in this stream network are spatially structured, but gene flow persists and is mediated by physical riverscape features and hydrologic distance. The observed patterns of genetic connectivity suggest that this habitat can support connectivity among populations of reintroduced Greenback Cutthroat Trout. In future native trout reintroduction efforts, prioritizing habitats with gradual stream gradients and fewer waterfalls would promote population connectivity.

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society↗

USGS2024

A genetic assessment of natural barriers for isolating a habitat network proposed for Greenback Cutthroat Trout reintroduction

Objective: Native inland trout conservation efforts rely on physical barriers to exclude nonnative salmonids from target habitats. We used genetic techniques to evaluate a series of natural waterfalls for their potential to serve as barriers to prevent nonnative salmonids from entering a proposed reintroduction area for federally threatened Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus virginalis stomias . Methods: Genetic samples were collected from nonnative Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis at 11 sampling reaches above and below natural waterfalls (height: ~1–3 m under base flow conditions) along a 33-km segment of Colorado's upper Cache la Poudre River near the outflow of the proposed reintroduction area. To evaluate whether upstream movement of Brook Trout is restricted by any of these waterfalls, we characterized longitudinal trends in genetic diversity along the river corridor and examined patterns of genetic differentiation and population structure in relation to waterfall locations using a panel of microsatellites. Result: We found no evidence that the waterfalls served as complete movement barriers for nonnative Brook Trout based on genetic clustering analyses, estimates of population differentiation, and longitudinal genetic patterns. Our multilocus assessment did not identify alleles restricted to downstream reaches, and the river segment was genetically homogenized. Conclusion: Our evaluation suggests that the existing waterfalls do not fully prevent upstream movement by nonnative Brook Trout, and thus barrier modification would be needed to establish an isolated Greenback Cutthroat Trout population in the proposed wilderness area.

Colorado↗

USGS2022

Gene flow and spatial population structure of Brook Trout in a large headwater stream network in Colorado

We studied gene flow of non-native Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis in a 60-km section of continuous stream network in the upper Cache la Poudre River basin, where a large-scale reclamation effort to restore federally threatened Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias (GBCT) is taking place. This effort—the Poudre Headwaters Project—represents the most important recovery effort of the state fish of Colorado and could result in a fivefold increase in total occupied GBCT habitat. However, the reclamation area is currently dominated by non-native Brook Trout; key steps to ensure the success of the Poudre Headwaters Project include removing non-native Brook Trout and physically isolating the area from reinvasion. We examined existing genetic population structure in the reclamation area to provide science-based guidance for effective Brook Trout removal and subsequent GBCT reintroduction. During 2018 and 2019, tissue samples were collected from 23 sites in the Long Draw region. We genotyped 792 Brook Trout using 12 microsatellite loci to examine genetic population structure within the reclamation area. Our results show that fine-scale genetic population structure is present among sites (F ST = 0.038) and overall genetic diversity is comparable to previously published estimates throughout the native range of Brook Trout (H O = 0.610; HE = 0.618). Analysis of genetic differentiation among sites indicates that sites in the reclamation area may function as a metapopulation, with fine-scale genetic structure present among tributaries that are connected by gene flow. Understanding how the landscape influences connectivity and population persistence will provide sciencebased guidance for Brook Trout removal efforts and allow managers to release GBCT in stretches of key habitat that ensure the highest probability of reintroduction success.

Colorado↗

USGS2021

Managing nonperennial headwater streams in temperate forests of the United States

Forest management guidelines are designed to protect water quality from unintended effects of land use changes such as timber harvest, mining, or forest road construction. Although streams that periodically cease to flow (nonperennial) drain the majority of forested areas, these streams are not consistently included in forest management guidelines. This paper reviews management guidelines for nonperennial (intermittent and ephemeral) streams draining temperate forests in the continental U.S., evaluates potential impacts of land use activities on ecosystem services provided by these streams, and identifies information needed to incorporate nonperennial streams into water quality protection practices. For federally administered lands, national management guidance is deliberately nonprescriptive, deferring to regional and forest-level recommendations for both perennial and nonperennial streams. Most state guidelines recommend riparian management zone (RMZ) protection for perennial streams (48/50 states) and intermittent streams (45/50 states), but only Alaska and West Virginia require RMZs around ephemeral streams. Based on the National Hydrography Dataset, an average of 58% of forested land area in the U.S. drains to nonperennial headwater streams, making these stream types the most common connectors between forested lands and the aquatic system. Land uses that modify flow regimes in these streams can affect sediment and organic matter transport and distribution, stream temperature dynamics, and biogeochemical processing. Nonperennial streams also provide material subsidies to downstream waters and serve as temporary habitats for some aquatic species. However, limited research has examined how forest land uses affect ecosystem services and biota in these streams. Therefore we highlight a set of key questions about nonperennial streams in forests, not the least of which is simply understanding where headwater stream channels are located and associated patterns of flow duration. Although many questions remain, we also note where recent advances in data collection, modeling and process-level research provide opportunities to resolve uncertainties around nonperennial streams in forested landscapes of the continental U.S.

Forest Ecology and Management↗

USGS2017

A rare and cryptic endemic of the Central Rocky Mountains, U.S.A: The distribution of the Arapahoe snowfly, Arsapnia arapahoe (Nelson & Kondratieff, 1988) (Plecoptera: Capniidae)

The Arapahoe snowfly, Arsapnia arapahoe (Nelson & Kondratieff, 1988) (Plecoptera: Capniidae) is a candidate species warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Prior to this study, A. arapahoe was known from only two tributaries of the Cache la Poudre River in Larimer County, Colorado: Young Gulch and Elkhorn Creek. The objectives of this study were to determine the distribution of this endemic stonefly, and to identify sympatric species as possible surrogate indicators of its occurrence. Eighty-four streams were sampled within the expected geographical range and emergence time-period from 2013 to 2017. Adults of A. arapahoe were discovered in 19 first-, second-, and fourth-order streams beyond the original type localities tributary to the Cache la Poudre River. The new and recently recorded localities were discovered in the Big Thompson River, St. Vrain River, Boulder Creek, and Upper South Platte River Watersheds. Two species, A. decepta (Banks, 1897) and Capnia gracilaria Claassen, 1924, always co-occurred with A. arapahoe , suggesting this species pair may serve as a surrogate indicator of suitable stream habitat for A. arapahoe . Suggestions for future investigation into the distribution, life-history, and habitat of A. arapahoe are presented to aid the conservation of this rare and endemic Colorado stonefly.

Colorado↗