Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Martin B. Goldhaber

Publications and source records attributed to Martin B. Goldhaber.

50 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
USGS1989

Sulfide mineralization and magnetization, Cement oil field, Oklahoma

Geochemical, petrographic, and rock-magnetic studies were undertaken to investigate possible sources for reported positive aeromagnetic anomalies over the Cement oil field, Oklahoma. Ferrimagnetic pyrrhotite (monoclinic, Fe 7 S 8 ), intergrown with more-abundant, nonmagnetic pyrite (FeS 2 ), is present in well-cutting, core, and quarry samples at Cement, and it is the only identified source of possible enhanced magnetization in rocks over the field. Magnetite, found only in well cuttings from Cement, is contamination from drilling. Magnetite was considered previously by others to be the source of magnetic anomalies at Cement.

Oklahoma↗
USGS1982

Biogenic and nonbiogenic ore-forming processes in the south Texas uranium district; evidence from the Panna Maria deposit

Geochemical and petrographic studies of core samples from the Panna Maria uranium deposit, a roll-type orebody in the Eocene Jackson Group in Karnes County, Texas, yield important information on the origin of the deposit. Organic carbon content averages about 0.42 weight percent in reduced rock and correlates postively with sulfur content. Pyrite is the dominant iron disulfide (FeS 2 ) mineral in most of the ore zone and throughout a surrounding zone of reduced barren ground, and it is commonly associated with organic debris. Marcasite is sparse except in ore adjacent to the altered tongue in one core and locally in mineralized lignite. Sulfur isotopic compositions (delta 34 S) of FeS 2 minerals range broadly from -1 to -34 per mil; the lightest delta 34 S values (less than -20 per mil) were measured in samples from mineralized lignite and from the nose of the ore roll. Petrographic and geochemical characteristics of the Panna Maria deposit contrast greatly with those of three other south Texas roll-type uranium deposits (the Benavides, Felder, and Lamprecht deposits), which are devoid of organic carbon and which contain more sulfide than does the Panna Maria. These three deposits are characterized by abundant isotopically light ore-stage marcasite and by isotopically heavy preore (in the Benavides) or postore (in the Felder and Lamprecht) pyrite. We have concluded previously that sulfide-bearing fault-leaked solutions from underlying hydrocarbon accumulations were important in the formation of the Benavides, Felder, and Lamprecht deposits. Although the Panna Maria deposit shows an apparent alignment along a fault zone, and although underlying formations in the Karnes County area contain sour gas (delta 34 S [asymp] + 14 per mil) and produce oil, the deposit lacks characteristics indicating that its formation or preservation involved extrinsically derived reductants such as fault-leaked aqueous sulfide. Mineralization of the Panna Maria, rather, appears to have been controlled by intrinsically derived reductants related either directly or indirectly to the presence of organic matter.

Texas↗
USGS1982

Uranium-lead isochron age and preliminary sulfur isotope systematics of the Felder uranium deposit, south Texas

Uranium-lead isotope systematics of roll-front ores in Miocene sandstone at the Felder and McLean uranium deposits (south Texas coastal plain) give a well-defined 207 Pb/ 204 Pb- 235 U/ 204 Pb isochron age of 5.07 + or - 0.15 m.y. The relatively slight degree of scatter of the points defining the isochron is probably due to initial Pb isotope inhomogeneity, and the resulting inferred persistence of closed system behavior for U and Pb is probably the result of the long-term presence of U- and Pb-immobilizing H 2 S. 206 Pb/ 238 U systematics are badly scattered owing to long-term migration of radioactive daughters of 238 U. Beta- and gamma-activity systematics of the ores consistently identify those with grossly anomalous Pb isotope systematics, however, and proved highly useful in identifying ores that have gained gross amounts of uranium daughters.FeS 2 minerals in the altered tongue of the host sandstone are characterized by abundant postore pyrite and heavy delta 34 S values, whereas FeS 2 minerals in mineralized and unaltered, barren rock are characterized by abundant ore-stage marcasite and by light delta 34 S values. The delta 34 S values of FeS 2 minerals in the altered tongue are similar to those defined for sour gas from the underlying Edwards Limestone of Cretaceous age, indicating the probable source for the sulfur of an inferred resulfidization event. The 5.07-m.y. isochron age probably reflects the end of roll-front development; we believe that the end was due to the resulfidization and does not preclude significant earlier periods of mineralization. Modern ground water in the area is also sulfide bearing (thus helping preserve the deposit), but with delta 34 S values distinct from those of sulfides in the resulfidized zone of the host rock.

Texas↗
USGS1979

Formation and resulfidization of a South Texas roll-type uranium deposit

Core samples from a roll type uranium deposit in Live Oak County, south Texas have been studied and results are reported for Se, Mo, FeS2 and organic-carbon distribution, sulfide mineral petrology, and sulfur isotopic composition of iron-disulfide phases. In addition, sulfur isotopic compositions of dissolved sulfate and sulfide from the modern ground water within the ore bearing sand have been studied. The suite of elements in the ore sand and their geometric relationships throughout the deposit are those expected for typical roll-type deposits with well-developed oxidation-reduction interfaces. However, iron-disulfide minerals are abundant in the altered tongue, demonstrating that this interval has been sulfidized after mineralization (resulfidized or rereduced). Iron disulfide minerals in the rereduced interval differ mineralogically and isotopically from those throughout the remainder of the deposit. The resulfidized sand contains dominantly pyrite that is enriched in 34S, whereas the sand beyond the altered tongue contains abundant marcasite that is enriched in the light isotope, 32S. Textural relationships between pyrite and marcasite help to establish relative timing of iron disulfide formation. In reduced rock outside the altered tongue, three distinct generations of iron disulfide are present. The oldest of these generations consists largely of pyrite with lesser amounts of marcasite. A major episode of marcasite formation contemporaneous with ore genesis postdates the oldest pyrite generation but predates a younger pyrite generation. Resulfidization probably led to the final pyrite stage recognized beyond the altered tongue. Stable isotope data establish that the source of sulfur for the resulfidization was fault-leaked H2S probably derived from the Edwards Limestone of Cretaceous age which underlies the deposit. The deposit formed in at least two stages: (1) a pre-ore process of host rock sulfidization which produced disseminated pyrite as the dominant iron disulfide phase; and (2) an ore-stage process which led to the development of the uranium roll with emplacement of the characteristic suite of minor and accessory elements and which produced abundant isotopically light marcasite. The host rock was modified by a post-ore stage of resulfidization which precipitated isotopically heavy pyrite. Sulfur isotopic compositions of sulfide and sulfate present in modern ground water within the host sand differ greatly from sulfur isotopic composition of iron disulfides formed during the resulfidization episode. Iron disulfide minerals formed from the sulfur species of modern ground water have not been unequivocally identified.

Open-File Report↗
USGS1979

Origin of marcasite and its implications regarding the genesis of roll-front uranium deposits

Study of five roll-type uranium deposits (three in Texas and two in Wyoming) has resulted in the recognition of ore-stage marcasite in each deposit. Ore-stage marcasite is identified by its close association with uranium- and vanadium-bearing phases in the ore zones; by its close association with ferroselite at and near the redox boundary in some deposits; by its abundance and distribution across deposits; and by its textural relationships with identifiable pre-ore iron disulfide minerals (primarily pyrite). In deposits that are essentially devoid of fossil vegetal debris, marcasite is the dominant ore-stage sulfide and occurs in a large volume of rock beyond the ore zones. In deposits that contain organic matter, ore-stage pyrite is at least as abundant as ore-stage marcasite. Many factors and processes may lead to the formation of either marcasite or pyrite as an ore-stage mineral in roll-type deposits. One of the dominant factors is the complex interrelationship of pH and sulfur species that are precursors of iron-disulfide minerals. Experimental work and study of geochemical environments analogous to those governing the formation of roll-type deposits indicate that relatively low pH (less than about six) and the presence of elemental sulfur favor marcasite, whereas higher pH and the presence of polysulfide ions favor pyrite. Conditions that favor marcasite as the dominant ore-stage iron disulfide are likely to arise during uranium deposition in host rock without fossil vegetal matter. In host rock containing carbonaceous debris, the presence of polysulfide ions and pH buffering any anaerobic bacterial metabolic processes apparently lead to the formation of ore-stage pyrite.

Open-File Report↗
USGS1978

Origin of a South Texas roll-type uranium deposit; I, Alteration of iron-titanium oxide minerals

The detrital Fe-Ti oxide minerals and their authigenic alteration products in samples from cores spanning 1.7 km across a roll-type uranium deposit in the mid-Tertiary Catahoula Tuff, south Texas, record important information on host-rock preparation and on development of the altered tongue of the deposit. In reduced rock, in front of and enveloping the altered tongue, iron disulfide minerals (pyrite and marcasite) have partially to completely replaced titanomagnetite and, to a lesser extent, titanohematite. Subsequent oxidation of these sulfidized Fe-Ti oxides, by processes that formed the altered tongue and uranium roll, produced ferric oxide and hydroxide phases (limonite) pseudomorphous after the sulfides. Fe-Ti oxides 1.0 km updip from the roll front were never sulfidized; titanomagnetite (partly replaced by hematite) and martite constitute nearly half of the heavy mineral fraction and limonite is absent. Oxidized rocks 210 m and closer to the nose of the roll front, however, are nearly devoid of titanomagnetite and contain abundant limonite. The redox interface that bounds the altered tongue, therefore, moved more than 210 m but less than 1.0 km. Detrital Fe-Ti oxide minerals are increasingly sulfidized in the downdip direction indicating that initial sulfidizaton was more intense in that direction. Organic carbon content is uniformly very low throughout the host sandstone, which implies that heterotrophic sulfate-reducing bacteria were not involved in the generation of sulfide. The H 2 S for the initial sulfidization may have been derived from oil and gas in formations that underlie the Catahoula Tuff. The H 2 S probably invaded the Catahoula along a fault that is 1.5 km downdip from the present roll front.

Texas↗
USGS1978

Origin of a South Texas roll-type deposit; II, Sulfide petrology and sulfur isotope studies

Petrologic and sulfur isotopic studies have been carried out on drill core samples from a roll-type uranium deposit in the mid-Tertiary Catahoula Tuff, Webb County, south Texas. Epigenetic iron disulfide minerals formed in two distinct stages. The first stage involved sulfidization of the host rock by sulfide (H 2 S, HS-)-bearing solutions that emanated from a fault about 1.5 km downdip from and subparallel to the orebody. Pyrite was the dominant iron disulfide mineral formed from this fault sulfide. The isotopic composition (delta 34 S) of first-stage iron disulfide is quite heavy (>0 per mil), in part because the fault-derived H 2 S was isotopically heavy. The development of the second-stage sulfides was related to processes that formed the uranium roll. Iron disulfide minerals produced during this second stage commonly occur as rims around the first-stage sulfides. The rims are exclusively marcasite in and adjacent to ore, but the pyrite content in these rims increases with increasing distance from ore. The sulfur of the second-stage sulfides in the vicinity of the roll front is isotopically light (--25 to --40 per mil). The virtual absence of organic carbon in the host sand precludes a bacterial origin for the ore-stage iron disulfide minerals and, therefore, eliminates bacterial metabolism as the mechanism for isotopic fractionation. Instead, the sulfur source for ore-stage sulfides was preore (first stage) sulfides, remobilized via partial oxidation to soluble metastable sulfur oxyanions.

Texas↗
USGS1978

Iron-titanium oxide minerals and associated alteration phases in some uranium-bearing sandstones

Detrital iron-titanium (Fe-Ti) oxide minerals of the ulvospinel-magnetite (titanomagnetite) and ilmenite-hematite (titanohematite) solid solution series are common in uranium-bearing sandstones. Alteration of Fe-Ti oxide minerals in oxidizing environments formed secondary products (primarily hematite) that are distinct from those produced under reducing conditions (iron disulfide minerals). Oxidation of sulfidized Fe-Ti oxide minerals, by the processes that formed uranium rolls, produced ferric oxide minerals (limonite) having textures that mimic those of the iron disulfides. Titanomagnetite and titanohematite have been severely depleted in the ore-bearing zones of some uranium deposits. The alteration of detrital Fe-Ti oxide minerals near uranium ore deposits may produce characteristic signatures in the magnetization of the sandstone. Knowledge of the distribution and magnetic properties of these minerals can aid in interpreting data from total magnetic-field and magnetic-susceptibility surveys of uranium deposits.

Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Wyoming↗
USGS1978

Recognition of oxidized sulfide minerals as an exploration guide for uranium

The difference in color between tan to red oxidized sandstone and gray reduced sandstone on either side of the reduction-oxidation (redox) interface, which is- the locus of uranium concentration in roll-type deposits, has been noted and used locally as an exploration guide within known uranium districts. Reduced sandstone is characterized in many deposits by the presence of iron sulflde minerals (particularly marcasite and pyrite) that occur as replacements of and overgrowths on iron-titanium oxide minerals and plant debris and as cement of detrital grains. Oxidation of the sulfldes by oxygenated ground water forms yellow to red ferric oxide and ferric hydroxide phases ("limonite") that replace the FeS 2 minerals. Processes other than the oxidation of sulfldes, however, can cause reddening of clastic sediments without the creation of a redox boundary, and so color alone is not a sufficient condition by which to judge the potential for uranium ore in frontier areas. Ferric oxides that form by the oxidation of iron sulflde minerals can be distinguished from other forms of ferric oxide by reflection microscopic examination of polished grain mounts- and polished thin sections'. Diagnostic features of oxidized sulfldes are limonite pseudomorphs of sulfldes and limonite containing internal textures that mimic characteristic textures of previously sulfldized detrital phases. Recognition of oxidized sulfides by reflection microscopy, then, can distinguish oxidized sandstones, which might have a redox boundary downdip and which would therefore be favorable hosts for uranium concentration, from those without such potential.

Journal of Research of the U.S. Geological Survey↗
USGS1977

Thermoluminescence of sand grains around a South Texas roll-type deposit

The termoluminescence of quartz and feldspar grains around a south Texas roll-type deposit was studied to determine whether a systematic variation in such thermoluminescence exists. Measurements of the thermoluminescence were made in the temperature ranges of 100° to 322°C and 315° to 410°C. Neither temperature range yielded data to differentiate between oxidized and reduced rock. The ratio of the lower temperature to the higher temperature thermoluminescence, however, was consistently higher in ore and reduced rock than in oxidized rock. Studies of thermoluminescence may be useful in identifying alteration related to uranium mineralization.

Texas↗