Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Mark Cornish

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Cornish.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Applying a metapopulation model to compare native and invasive fish passage scenarios in the Upper Mississippi River

The U.S. Geological Survey assessed the ability of metapopulation models to evaluate population-level effects of fish passage projects in the Upper Mississippi River for six native species: Ictalurus furcatus (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1840; blue catfish), Ictiobus cyprinellus (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1844; bigmouth buffalo), Acipenser fulvescens (Rafinesque, 1817; lake sturgeon), Polyodon spathula (Walbaum, 1792; American paddlefish [paddlefish]), Ictiobus bubalus (Rafinesque, 1818; smallmouth buffalo), Scaphirhynchus platorynchus (Rafinesque, 1818; shovelnose sturgeon), and one invasive species: Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1844; silver carp). The study had four objectives: to (1) compile parameter values and identify gaps, (2) parameterize species-specific models, (3) apply the models to multiple scenarios, and (4) develop a point-and-click interface. The literature review revealed a paucity of data, for all species except silver carp and paddlefish; however, length–weight relations, female length–maturity curves, growth curves, spawning and recruitment estimates, and movement data among pools were identified. These data allowed the parameterization of native species metapopulation models, in addition to the use of an existing silver carp model. The models were applied to scenarios representing increased passage, decreased passage, combined passage and deterrents effects, and increased native passage with decreased invasive passage. Increased passage scenarios (depicting potential passage projects) produced greater movement and larger upriver populations. Decreased passage scenarios (depicting potential deterrent projects) yielded reduced movement. Similar population dynamic patterns were observed across species for each scenario because of a lack of species-specific empirical movement data. Simulations for longer lived, slow growing species required longer response times, including time to reach equilibria. A point-and-click model was created to allow others to use the model. Data availability for movement limited the ability of the model to be used to understand fish-movement biology and thereby inform management strategies. More fish-movement data could improve model projections of these scenarios.

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin↗

Evaluation of fish passage for assessment of invasive carp deterrents at locks in the upper Mississippi River

Invasive carps are established in the upper, middle, and lower Mississippi River and their expansion upstream threatens a variety of aquatic ecosystem services including fishing and recreational boating. The physical and operational characteristics of Lock and Dam (LD) 19 restrict upstream movement of fishes because the only upstream fish passage route is through the lock chamber. This restriction might be hindering consistent reproduction and recruitment of invasive carps enough to reduce their abundance upstream from LD 19. Locks and Dams 5, 14, and 15 (upriver from LD 19) are infrequently at open-condition and may also be limiting the continued upstream expansion of invasive carps. Upstream passage of fishes at these locations would be limited to the lock chamber for the majority of the year (Wilcox et al. 2004; Bouska 2021).

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin↗

Evaluation of fish passage for assessment of invasive carp deterrents at locks in the Upper Mississippi River

Invasive carp are established in the upper, middle, and lower Mississippi River and their expansion upstream threatens a variety of aquatic ecosystem services including fishing and recreational boating (U.S. Geological Survey, 2021). The physical and operational characteristics of Lock and Dam (LD) 19 restrict upstream movement of fishes because the only upstream fish passage route is through the lock chamber. This restriction might be hindering consistent reproduction and recruitment of Silver Carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and bighead carp H. nobilis (collectively referred to as bigheaded carp) enough to reduce their abundance upstream of LD 19. Locks and Dams 14 and 15 are infrequently in open-river condition (defined as the time when the adjustable spillway gates of the dam are raised out of the water, passing unobstructed water through the gates) and may also be limiting the continued upstream spread of invasive carp populations. Upstream passage of fishes at these locations would be limited to the lock chamber for the majority of the year (Wilcox et al., 2004; Bouska, 2021).

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin↗

Application of the technology readiness levels framework to natural resource management tools

Technology advancements in fisheries science can provide useful tools to support natural resource management and conservation. However, new technologies may also present challenges for decision makers due to the lack of a standardized process to assess technologies for consideration within management plans. Future technology development in fishery and water resources could benefit from a framework that assigns an appropriate technology development stage and defines the readiness for implementation. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) are one established research and development scale used throughout engineering and related disciplines that could be applied to natural resource management tools. The TRL assess the maturity of a technology from nascent idea through a fully developed technology. Steps within this scale could provide a general framework for researchers to follow when planning and conducting studies, while similarly providing a standard scale for resource managers to assess readiness for technology transfer and implementation. The goal of this paper is to describe TRL in the context of natural resource management tools and offer this existing framework as one option to facilitate communication between researchers and managers.

Fisheries↗