Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

M.R. Chivers

Publications and source records attributed to M.R. Chivers.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Response of anaerobic carbon cycling to water table manipulation in an Alaskan rich fen

To test the effects of altered hydrology on organic soil decomposition, we investigated CO 2 and CH 4 production potential of rich-fen peat (mean surface pH = 6.3) collected from a field water table manipulation experiment including control, raised and lowered water table treatments. Mean anaerobic CO 2 production potential at 10 cm depth (14.1 ± 0.9 μmol C g −1 d −1 ) was as high as aerobic CO 2 production potential (10.6 ± 1.5 μmol C g −1 d −1 ), while CH4 production was low (mean of 7.8 ± 1.5 nmol C g −1 d −1 ). Denitrification enzyme activity indicated a very high denitrification potential (197 ± 23 μg N g −1 d −1 ), but net NO - 3 reduction suggested this was a relatively minor pathway for anaerobic CO 2 production. Abundances of denitrifier genes ( nirK and nosZ ) did not change across water table treatments. SO 2- 4 reduction also did not appear to be an important pathway for anaerobic CO 2 production. The net accumulation of acetate and formate as decomposition end products in the raised water table treatment suggested that fermentation was a significant pathway for carbon mineralization, even in the presence of NO - 3 . Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations were the strongest predictors of potential anaerobic and aerobic CO 2 production. Across all water table treatments, the CO 2 :CH 4 ratio increased with initial DOC leachate concentrations. While the field water table treatment did not have a significant effect on mean CO 2 or CH 4 production potential, the CO 2 :CH 4 ratio was highest in shallow peat incubations from the drained treatment. These data suggest that with continued drying or with a more variable water table, anaerobic CO 2 production may be favored over CH 4 production in this rich fen. Future research examining the potential for dissolved organic substances to facilitate anaerobic respiration, or alternative redox processes that limit the effectiveness of organic acids as substrates in anaerobic metabolism, would help explain additional uncertainty concerning carbon mineralization in this system.

Soil Biology and Biochemistry↗

Effects of experimental water table and temperature manipulations on ecosystem CO 2 fluxes in an Alaskan rich fen

Peatlands store 30% of the world's terrestrial soil carbon (C) and those located at northern latitudes are expected to experience rapid climate warming. We monitored growing season carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) fluxes across a factorial design of in situ water table (control, drought, and flooded plots) and soil warming (control vs. warming via open top chambers) treatments for 2 years in a rich fen located just outside the Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest in interior Alaska. The drought (lowered water table position) treatment was a weak sink or small source of atmospheric CO 2 compared to the moderate atmospheric CO 2 sink at our control. This change in net ecosystem exchange was due to lower gross primary production and light-saturated photosynthesis rather than increased ecosystem respiration. The flooded (raised water table position) treatment was a greater CO 2 sink in 2006 due largely to increased early season gross primary production and higher light-saturated photosynthesis. Although flooding did not have substantial effects on rates of ecosystem respiration, this water table treatment had lower maximum respiration rates and a higher temperature sensitivity of ecosystem respiration than the control plot. Surface soil warming increased both ecosystem respiration and gross primary production by approximately 16% compared to control (ambient temperature) plots, with no net effect on net ecosystem exchange. Results from this rich fen manipulation suggest that fast responses to drought will include reduced ecosystem C storage driven by plant stress, whereas inundation will increase ecosystem C storage by stimulating plant growth. ?? 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Ecosystems↗