Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

M. R. Klepper

Publications and source records attributed to M. R. Klepper.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS1971

On the nature of the Boulder Batholith of Montana

In a recent review of the nature of batholiths, Hamilton and Myers (1967) interpreted the Boulder batholith of western Montana to be "in effect a gigantic mantled lava flow .... only a few kilometers thick," that flowed, under a crust of its own ejecta, across a broad structural basin. Such an interpretation is inconsistent with abundant geologic and geophysical data. The main mass of the batholith, the Butte Quartz Monzonite, does not have the characteristics of a lava flow or a laterally emplaced sheet. Its volcanic cover was not a floating cap but a laterally stable roof that was part of a volcanic plateau which occupied at least twice the area of the batholith. It does not thin toward its edges but is generally steep sided. Its flow structures are predominantly steep rather than near horizontal. It is separated from two smaller flanking plutons by thin vertical septa kilometers long. Its emplacement required more than 4 m.y., a rate orders of magnitude too slow for a single sheet only a few kilometers thick, however extensive. The batholith is more than a few kilometers thick. Recent gravity studies (Burfeind, 1967; Bonini, 1969) suggest a maximum thickness of 9 to 15 km to their authors, but the calculations are based on (1) assumed lateral and vertical homogeneity of the batholith, whereas in reality the Butte Quartz Monzonite core is discontinuously rimmed by more mafic, denser plutons; and (2) inappropriate densities, leading to excessive apparent density contrasts. The gravity data suggest to us that the batholith is more than 15 km thick. Heat flow, cooling rate, and seismic data also are compatible with a thickness of at least 15 km, but are difficult to reconcile with a thickness of only a few kilometers. Convincing examples of extrusive or quasi-extrusive thin batholiths must be sought elsewhere. © 1971, The Geological Society of America, Inc.

Montana↗
USGS1968

Lead and strontium isotope studies of the Boulder Batholith, Southwestern Montana

The isotopic composition of lead in feldspar varies widely from pluton to pluton of the Late Cretaceous Boulder batholith, encompassing the following ranges in isotopic values: 16.9-18.1 for Pb 206 /Pb 204 ; 15.4-15.7 for Pb 207 /Pb 204 ; and 37.7-38.5 for Pb 205 /Pb 204 . Although each pluton has a characteristic isotopic composition, the fact that Pb 206 /Pb 204 for the Butte Quartz Monzonite varies by 1.3 percent, compared to a range of about 8.6 percent for the batholith as a whole, suggests that perfect isotopic mixing of the magma was not always attained. Whole rock initial Sr 87 /Sr 88 for the entire batholith ranges from 0.705 to 0.710, comparable to ranges for the Sierra Nevada and British Columbia batholiths. Ore leads of the Butte district are isotopically very similar to feldspar leads of the host Butte Quartz Monzonite. This isotopic similarity was interpreted by Murthy and Patterson (1961a) to indicate complete mixing of independently derived feldspar lead and ore lead rather than close genetic relationship. However, detailed study of the only sample in the present investigation, from the Donald pluton, that clearly has mixed leads shows significant differences in lead isotopic composition between megacryst K-feldspar and both the groundmass K-feldspar and plagioclase, indicating that isotopic mixing of leads is not complete, even within a single hand specimen. Spatial relations of isotopic differences among the various plutons strongly suggest that complete mixing of leads of different isotopic composition from the magma did not occur in the Butte Quartz Monzonite nor in any other pluton of the batholith, and that the isotopic similarity between Butte ore and feldspar lead of the host rock indeed stems from a genetic association. Lead and strontium isotope ratios generally behave in a similar way; that is, the more radiogenic the lead in a rock, the more radiogenic the strontium. The source of the lead which could produce the isotope variations observed for the batholith is calculated to have a mean age of about 2,200 m.y., which is compatible with ages of Precambrian crystalline rocks in the region, and an isotopic makeup with U 238 /pb 204 <9, Th/U > 4, and Rb/Sr of 0.03-0.09. However, no large volumes of prebatholith rocks exposed in the Boulder batholith region are of the required isotopic composition, which is typical of basaltic-gabbroic or quartz dioritic chemical composition. Models involving complete melting of possible source materials to account for the isotope variations are considered and rejected. Mechanisms involving par.tial melting of lower crustal or upper mantle source material appear to be the most viable in explaining the observed isotopic compositions. Assimilation of upper crustal material (i.e., the Precambrian Belt and pre-Belt rocks, in which the lead and strontium are more radiogenic than in the batholith rocks) may have accompanied partial melting of the lower crust or upper mantle and indeed must have played a major role if the source material had a composition isotopically comparable to that observed for oceanic tholelites (i.e., low Th/U, U 238 /Pb 204 and Rb/Sr), but would be relatively unimportant if the source material were sufficiently radiogenic to begin with as might be expected from basalt, gabbro, or quartz diorite compositions 2,200 m.y. old. © 1968 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc.

Montana↗
USGS1968

Overlapping plutonism, volcanism, and tectonism in the boulder batholith region, western Montana

It is well known that the Boulder batholith region experienced intensive plutonism, volcanism, and tectonism that all began in Late Cretaceous time, after at least 700 m.y. of structural and igneous inactivity except for sporadic epeirogeny. Recent stratigraphic, structural, paleontologic, arid, especially, radiometric evidence makes it possible to date these dynamic events rather closely. The time relations that are revealed do not form a simple sequence of volcanism-folding-thrusting-batholith emplacement, as has often been supposed, but involve an intertwined complex. Significant volcanism began ∼ 85 m.y. ago in late Coniacian or early Santonian time, with deposition of the thick, local tuffaceous Slim Sam Formation. Volcanism climaxed from 77 to 79 m.y. ago, in early Campanian time, when the region was buried under at least 10,000 feet of calc-alkalic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks, which included many sheets of welded tuff - the Elkhorn Mountains Volcanics -, and a vast amount of contemporaneous ash was airborne beyond the region. Major volcanism ceased ∼ 73 m.y. ago, late in the Campanian, not to recur until early Eocene time, ∼ 50 m.y. ago. The bulk of the batholith was emplaced beneath and within the volcanic edifice in early and middle Campanian time, during a 6 m.y. span from 78 to 72 m.y. ago, and some leucocratic masses were intruded during the next few million years, so that the whole batholith was emplaced within about 10 m.y. Folding at and near the site of the batholith began in late Coniacian or Santonian time and culminated before middle Campanian time; the main folding north and east of the batholith was post-Campanian, probably Maestrichtian. Thrusting began before middle Santonian time, and recurred intermittently well into the Maestrichtian, or even a little later. Thus volcanism, plutonism, folding, and thrusting began and ended within a few million years of each other, during the last 20 m.y. of the Cretaceous. Major folding, thrusting, and volcanism started about the same time, though not always at the same places, and a little earlier than plutonism. In any given locality, volcanism ended before major folding; the climax of plutonism followed the climax of volcanism; thrusting preceded and accompanied plutonism near the batholith, but followed plutonism farther away; thrusting ended a little later than folding. These dynamic processes so closely related in time and space must also be genetically related in the Boulder batholith region. Gilluly's (1965) conclusion that the orogeny which produced the great Cretaceous thrusts of Montana was "essentially without plutonic associations" is not tenable.

Montana↗
USGS1957

Geology of the southern Elkhorn Mountains, Jefferson and Broadwater Counties, Montana

The geology of an area of about 270 square miles in the southern Elkhorn Mountains, west of Townsend in west-central Montana, is described. The mountains in the southern part of the area comprise northward-trending alternating ridges and valleys underlain principally by folded sedimentary rocks. They merge northward into the higher and more rugged main mass of the mountains, which is underlain principally by upper Cretaceous volcanic rocks. The mountaintops are 1,000 to 4,500 feet above the major valleys. The sedimentary rocks range in age from Precambrian to Tertiary and the igneous rocks from late Cretaceous to probably middle Tertiary. The oldest rocks are varicolored mudstone, shale, and sandstone of the Belt series of late Precambrian age. They are overlain with slight unconformity by a moderately thick but incomplete section of Paleozoic rocks. The basal Paleozoic formation is the Flathead quartzite of Middle Cambrian age, which is overlain by alternating units of shale and carbonate rock : the Wolsey shale, the Meagher limestone, the Park shale, the Pilgrim dolomite, and the Red Lion formation, all of Cambrian age. A slight erosional unconformity between the Red Lion formation and the Maywood formation of late Devonian age marks a long interval of crustal stability in the area. The Maywood is overlain by the Jefferson dolomite and the Three Forks shale of Late Devonian and Mississippian age, and these in turn are conformably overlain by the Lodgepole and Mission Canyon limestones, a thick carbonate sequence of Mississippian age. A slight erosional unconformity separates the Mission Canyon limestone from the Amsden formation, which probably includes beds of both Mississippian and Pennsylvanian age. The Amsden is composed of a heterogeneous assemblage of arenaceous, argillaceous, dolomitic, and calcareous rocks and grades upward into the Quadrant formation of Pennsylvanian age, an alternation of quartzitic sandstone and dolomite. At the top of the Paleozoic section is the Phosphoria formation of Permian age, a thin unit of chert and quartzitic sandstone that contains a few thin phosphate beds. The basal Mesozoic unit is the Swift formation of late Jurassic age, a thin calcareous marine sandstone that overlies the Phosphoria with slight erosional unconformity. It is overlain by nonmarine shale and sandstone of the Morrison formation of late Jurassic age and the Kootenai formation of Early Cretaceous age. The Kootenai is overlain, possibly with slight erosional unconformity, by the Colorado formation an assemblage of marine dark shale and siliceous mudstone and nonmarine quartz-chert sandstone. The Colorado formation as here used includes beds of both Early and Late Cretaceous age. The Colorado in places grades upwards into a sequence of feldspathic sandstone and tuff beds here named the Slim Sam formation. Elsewhere within the area, the Slim Sam formation is absent, probably in part owing to erosion and in part nondeposition. Where present, the Slim Sam grades upward into a thick sequence of andesitic and quartz latitic volcanic rocks, comprising tuffs, lapilli tuffs, breccias, welded tuffs and flows, that are here named the Elkhorn Mountains volclinics and are probably entirely of Cretaceous age. Where the Slim Sam formation is absent, the Elkhorn Mountains volcanics rest with angular unconformity on beds as old as the Morrison. The pre-Tertiary layered rocks, aggregating more than 15,000 feet in thickness, were folded and intruded by igneous rocks of several types, and the area was uplifted and eroded to a terrain of mature relief, similar to that of the present. During the Oligocene epoch, volcanic sediments with interbreds of nonvolcanic gravel accumulated. These beds were in turn moderately eroded, and gravel of Miocene ( ?) age was deposited in channels within them. Subsequently, probably during the Pliocene epoch, the Tertiary beds were weakly deformed locally, and a pediment was cut across the Tertiary and older rocks in the southern part of the area. Fan gravel, in part of Recent origin and in part older, blankets parts of the pediment. Glacial deposits of at least two stages of Pleistocene glaciation are present in the higher mountains in the northern part of the area. The intrusive igneous rocks, except for a few felsite dikes of uncertain age, are divisible into two groups, primarily on the basis of structural relations and secondarily on the basis of composition and fabric. The older group of dioritic and andesitic rocks were intruded in part, if not wholly, prior to the main folding and are similar in chemical and mineralogical composition to the Elkhorn Mountains volcanics. They were probably emplaced throughout the period of volcanism that commenced in late Niobrara time and continued until late Cretaceous time. The younger group consists chiefly of quartzbearing phanerites but includes rocks ranging from gabbro to alaskitic granite and aplite. These rocks were emplaced after the main episode of folding and faulting. The Boulder batholith, composed dominantly of quartz monzonite, is the principal body of this younger group. The older igneous rocks metamorphosed the invaded rocks only slightly. In contrast, the younger intrusive bodies, and especially the batholith, altered and recrystallized the country rock in moderately broad belts, changing them to various types of hornfels, calcsilicate rock, marble, and vitreous quartzite. Concomitantly magnetite, garnet, axinite, and other high-temperature replacement minerals formed locally as products of additive metamorphism. The pre-Tertiary layered rocks of the southern Elkhorn Mountains are folded into northward-trending folds and are cut by many faults. The sedimentary rocks tend to be more tightly folded than the Elkhorn Mountains volcanics, although both were involved in the major folding. The principal folds of the area from east to west are : a major dome, a complex syncline with several second-order folds, and a remnant of a northward-plunging anticline, the major part of which was engulfed by the batholith. The folded rocks are cut by many faults of small to moderate displacement and by two faults of large displacement. Most of the faults were probably formed by the same forces that produced the folds. The origin of the two major faults, however, is uncertain, and may be related to igneous activity. The batholith crosscuts the folded structure and is in turn cut by small faults. Some parts of the area were elevated along steep normal faults in late Tertiary time. The southern part of the Elkhorn Mountains has been mountainous at least since early Oligocene time, and probably began to take form during the Cretaceous. As a consequence of long continued erosion, the modern topography reflects the structure and lithologic character of the underlying rocks except in a few areas blanketed by poorly consolidated Tertiary rocks and in the higher mountains where glaciation has been prominent. Silver, lead, zinc, and gold have been produced, either singly or, more typically, as a combination of metals from a number of types of ore deposits. Replacement deposits in carbonate rocks are the most common type, but veins, contact metamorphic deposits, and pipelike bodies of breccia cemented by ore and gangue minerals also are present. The Elkhorn mining district has the largest number of mines and the greatest variety of types of deposits. In the Tizer Basin several narrow goldbearing veins cut andesitic volcanic rocks, and in the southern part of the area sporadic small veins and replacement deposits occur in carbonate rocks. The mines and prospects of the area are described, and some suggestions for future prospecting are outlined. The application of geochemical prospecting techniques may prove of value, judging from the results of reconnaissance soil sampling in the vicinity of the Elkhorn mine.

Montana↗
USGS1953

Beaverhead formation, a Laramide deposit in Beaverhead County, Montana

The name Beaverhead formation is proposed for a thick sequence of conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and limestone that crops out over an area of at least 400 square miles in Beaverhead County, Montana, extends southward across the Montana-Idaho boundary, and may extend eastward into Madison County. These rocks are clearly sedimentary by-products of the Laramide orogeny and probably range from late Cretaceous to early Eocene. The Beaverhead formations consists predominantly of conglomerate. In part of the area, an upper and a lower conglomerate member are separated by a middle member of limestone. Where the limestone member is inconspicuous or absent, the upper and lower conglomerate members cannot be differentiated. The most nearly complete and best-exposed known section of the Beaverhead formation, designated the type section, is near the mouth of McKnight Canyon, 6 miles west of Dell, Montana. Here the formation can be divided into four mappable units; elsewhere no more than three units can be recognized. In the McKnight Canyon section, the top and bottom members are dominantly conglomerate, composed of pebbles, cobbles, and subordinate boulders set in a sandy matrix cemented by calcite; breccia beds occur locally. This coarse debris was derived from rocks of Precambrian, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic age and consists largely of limestone and quartzite. The intermediate member consists of two mappable units: a lower thick, massive limestone, locally concretionary, and an upper sequence of interbedded siltstone, sandstone, arkose, limestone, and subordinate conglomerate. At McKnight Canyon, where the base and the top of the formation have been faulted and eroded, the exposed thickness of the section is approximately 9700 feet. The Beaverhead formation rests unconformably on rocks as young as the Colorado group and as old as early Paleozoic, and it probably rests unconformably upon rocks as young as the Montana group and as old as Precambrian. It is unconformably overlain by vertebrate-bearing fluviatile or lacustrine tuffaceous beds of Eocene and Oligocene age. The coarse debris that composes the formation was eroded from nearby mountains that were uplifted in Late Cretaceous, Paleocene, and early Eocene time, and was deposited in basins adjacent to these mountains. The resulting rocks, a product of Laramide orogeny, were later folded and displaced by overthrusting and block faulting. In places, these rocks are overlain by thrust sheets of Paleozoic rocks. © 1953, The Geological Society of America, Inc.

Montana↗
USGS1952

Stratigraphic sections of the Phosphoria in Montana, 1947-48

The U. S. Geological Survey has recently measured and sampled the Phosphoria formation at many localities in Montana and other western states. These data will not be fully synthesized and analyzed for several years, but segments of the data, accompanied by little or no interpretation, will be published as preliminary reports as they are assembled. This report, which contains abstracts of many of the sections measured in southwestern Montana (pl. 1), is one of this series. The field and laboratory procedures adopted in these investigations are described rather fully in a companion report (McKelvey and others, 1952). Many people have taken part in this investigation. The program of which this work is a part was organized by V. E. McKelvey. J. G. Evans, J. E. Joyce, J. A. Kelleher, R. L. Konizeski, J. A. Mann, R. L. Parker, J. E Smedley, L. A. Thomas, and W. H. Wilson participated in the description of strata and collection of samples referred to in this report. The laboratory preparation of samples for chemical analysis was done in Denver, Colo., under the direction of W. P. Huleatt. All the P 2 O 5 , F, V 2 O 5 , and acid-insoluble analyses were made for the Survey by the U. S. Bureau of Mines at the Northwest Electrodevelopment Laboratory, Albany, Oreg., under the direction of S. M. Shelton and M. L. Wright. The Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , and loss-on-ignition analyses were about equally distributed between the Bureau of Mines and the Trace Elements Section laboratory of the Survey in Washington, D. C., under the direction of J. C. Rabbit by chemists I. Barlow, A. Caemmerer, J. Greene, N. Guttag, and E. H. Humphrey. The spectrographic analyses were made by D. M. Mortimer, of the Bureau Mines in Albany, and the oil-shale analyses were made by the Bureau of Mines Petroleum and Oil-Shale Experiment Station at Laramie, Wyo. Compilation of the data has been largely by R. P. Sheldon and F. D. Frieske. Organization of the tabular data has been largely by Anita Cozzetto.

Montana↗
USGS1947

The sangdong tungsten deposit, southern Korea

The Sangdong deposit consists of metamorphosed lenticular beds in a sequence of gently dipping argillaceous sedimentary rocks. It is believed that scheelite mineralization was simultaneous with metamorphism, followed by deposition of wolframite during a later hydrothermal phase. The reserve of ore is estimated to be 3,000,000 tons, containing 51,000 tons of WO (sub 3.)

southern Korea↗
USGS1944

Georgia mica mines

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Open-File Report↗