Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Lesley K. Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Lesley K. Smith.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA

Denitrification is an important net sink for NO 3 − in streams, but direct measurements are limited and in situ controlling factors are not well known. We measured denitrification at multiple scales over a range of flow conditions and NO 3 − concentrations in streams draining agricultural land in the upper Mississippi River basin. Comparisons of reach-scale measurements (in-stream mass transport and tracer tests) with local-scale in situ measurements (pore-water profiles, benthic chambers) and laboratory data (sediment core microcosms) gave evidence for heterogeneity in factors affecting benthic denitrification both temporally (e.g., seasonal variation in NO 3 − concentrations and loads, flood-related disruption and re-growth of benthic communities and organic deposits) and spatially (e.g., local stream morphology and sediment characteristics). When expressed as vertical denitrification flux per unit area of streambed ( U denit , in μmol N m −2 h −1 ), results of different methods for a given set of conditions commonly were in agreement within a factor of 2–3. At approximately constant temperature (~20 ± 4°C) and with minimal benthic disturbance, our aggregated data indicated an overall positive relation between U denit (~0–4,000 μmol N m −2 h −1 ) and stream NO 3 − concentration (~20–1,100 μmol L −1 ) representing seasonal variation from spring high flow (high NO 3 − ) to late summer low flow (low NO 3 − ). The temporal dependence of U denit on NO 3 − was less than first-order and could be described about equally well with power-law or saturation equations (e.g., for the unweighted dataset, U denit ≈26 * [NO 3 − ] 0.44 or U denit ≈640 * [NO 3 − ]/[180 + NO 3 − ]; for a partially weighted dataset, U denit ≈14 * [NO 3 − ] 0.54 or U denit ≈700 * [NO 3 − ]/[320 + NO 3 − ]). Similar parameters were derived from a recent spatial comparison of stream denitrification extending to lower NO 3 − concentrations (LINX2), and from the combined dataset from both studies over 3 orders of magnitude in NO 3 − concentration. Hypothetical models based on our results illustrate: (1) U denit was inversely related to denitrification rate constant ( k 1 denit , in day −1 ) and vertical transfer velocity ( v f,denit , in m day −1 ) at seasonal and possibly event time scales; (2) although k 1 denit was relatively large at low flow (low NO 3 − ), its impact on annual loads was relatively small because higher concentrations and loads at high flow were not fully compensated by increases in U denit ; and (3) although NO 3 − assimilation and denitrification were linked through production of organic reactants, rates of NO 3 − loss by these processes may have been partially decoupled by changes in flow and sediment transport. Whereas k 1 denit and v f,denit are linked implicitly with stream depth, NO 3 − concentration, and(or) NO 3 − load, estimates of U denit may be related more directly to field factors (including NO 3 − concentration) affecting denitrification rates in benthic sediments. Regional regressions and simulations of benthic denitrification in stream networks might be improved by including a non-linear relation between U denit and stream NO 3 − concentration and accounting for temporal variation.

Biogeochemistry

Investigation of denitrification rates in an ammonia-dominated constructed wastewater treatment wetland

Denitrification measurements were made under simulated field conditions using sediment cores and water collected from the Hemet/San Jacinto Multipurpose Demonstration Wetland (Riverside County, California, USA). The 9.9 ha constructed wetland is used to both polish ammonia-dominated secondary municipal effluent and provide migratory bird habitat. The wetland was originally constructed as a marsh-pond-marsh system in 1994. Over the period from January through March 1998, measured denitrification rates averaged 20.9 ± 20.9 μmol N m −2 h −1 within the emergent marsh portions of the wetland and 646 ± 353 μmol N m −2 h −1 in open water areas. The mean areal denitrification removal rate for this period was 0.70 kg N ha −1 d −1 , which accounted for about 8% of the total N removed by the wetland. Internal retention was the main N-removal mechanism. Synoptic water quality surveys indicated that denitrification was limited by a lack of nitrification within the wetland. Between April 1998 and January 1999, the wetland was reconfigured as a hemi-marsh system, having equal areas of interspersed emergent marsh and deep open water. In May 1999, measured denitrification rates averaged 1414 ± 298 μmol N m −2 h −1 within the emergent marsh zones and 682 ± 218 μmol N m −2 h −1 in the open water areas. The mean areal denitrification removal rate was 3.58 kg N ha −1 d −1 , which accounted for 40% of the total N removed by the wetland. A synoptic water quality survey indicated that nitrification within the wetland had been enhanced by the reduction of emergent macrophyte biomass and the increase in the area of interspersed deep open water. The modifications to the wetland shifted the nitrogen balance from a large internal storage component and a small denitrification component in 1998 to a more denitrifying system in 1999.

Wetlands