Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Laura Mcmahon

Publications and source records attributed to Laura Mcmahon.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Modeling individual-level and population-level nest success of California Condors from movement data

The California Condor ( Gymnogyps californianus ) is a critically endangered species with populations that are not currently self-sustaining. Although understanding nest success is key to understanding trends in their populations, field monitoring of condor nests has become increasingly challenging as the number of nesting condors has increased and their range has expanded. We investigated whether California Condor nest fate could be accurately estimated from telemetry data with limited field observations. Our study focused on the southern California population of California Condors (2015–2022), and we used a recently published Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework that combines movement data and occasional field observations to estimate individual-level and population-level nest success. The model detected shifts in space use to categorize if each nest failed or if a young fledged. Estimated model parameters suggested that after nest failure, condors shifted toward more expansive space use. Additional field observations, not included as data in the model, provided evidence that we accurately categorized nest fate for 63 out of 65 California Condor nesting attempts. Finally, we scaled individual-level reproductive success to estimate annual population-level nesting success. These methods offer managers a way to reduce field monitoring efforts while still allowing for estimation of nest success, which will be key as the breeding populations of California Condors continue to grow and become more widely spread across the landscape.

California

Effects of body size on estimation of mammalian area requirements

Accurately quantifying species’ area requirements is a prerequisite for effective area-based conservation. This typically involves collecting tracking data on species of interest and then conducting home-range analyses. Problematically, autocorrelation in tracking data can result in space needs being severely underestimated. Based on the previous work, we hypothesized the magnitude of underestimation varies with body mass, a relationship that could have serious conservation implications. To evaluate this hypothesis for terrestrial mammals, we estimated home-range areas with global positioning system (GPS) locations from 757 individuals across 61 globally distributed mammalian species with body masses ranging from 0.4 to 4000 kg. We then applied block cross-validation to quantify bias in empirical home-range estimates. Area requirements of mammals <10 kg were underestimated by a mean approximately15%, and species weighing approximately100 kg were underestimated by approximately50% on average. Thus, we found area estimation was subject to autocorrelation-induced bias that was worse for large species. Combined with the fact that extinction risk increases as body mass increases, the allometric scaling of bias we observed suggests the most threatened species are also likely to be those with the least accurate home-range estimates. As a correction, we tested whether data thinning or autocorrelation-informed home-range estimation minimized the scaling effect of autocorrelation on area estimates. Data thinning required an approximately93% data loss to achieve statistical independence with 95% confidence and was, therefore, not a viable solution. In contrast, autocorrelation-informed home-range estimation resulted in consistently accurate estimates irrespective of mass. When relating body mass to home range size, we detected that correcting for autocorrelation resulted in a scaling exponent significantly >1, meaning the scaling of the relationship changed substantially at the upper end of the mass spectrum.

Conservation Biology