Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Kevin Feris

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin Feris.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Weed-suppressive bacteria effects differ in culture compared to in soils and with or without microbial competition and separation of active ingredient

Weed-suppressive bacteria (WSB), specifically the D7 and ACK55 strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens , were previously reported to selectively inhibit growth of invasive annual grasses (IAGs) that have caused severe ecosystem degradation across much of the western US. However, recent studies show highly mixed evidence for WSB effectiveness in field settings. We evaluated how the effectiveness of WSB, specifically selective inhibition of exotic annual but not native perennial grasses, was altered by (1) growth media (soil vs. agar culture), (2) pre-sterilization to remove competing microbes, and (3) WSB concentration, reduced by centrifuging with and without filtration. WSB had no effects in soil microcosms with or without pre-sterilization, but WSB did have effects in agar cultures. On agar, WSB effects were amplified by pre-sterilizing seeds prior to treatment with WSB inoculum – but effects were non-selective (i.e., native and exotic plants were equally inhibited) with or without pre-sterilization at high WSB concentration. The only selective effects of WSB were observed on agar at low WSB concentrations, made possible by centrifuging WSB cells out of the inoculum prior to treatment application (from ~10 7 to ~10 5 live cells/ml). Completely removing WSB cells from inoculum by filtration led to no WSB effects. While these results suggest the desired effects of WSB can be reproduced on agar with a supernatant containing the putative active agent and a low density of WSB cells, the effect is still not reproducible for plants in soil, even when competing microbes are removed. Thus, additional research is needed to determine if, when, where, and how WSB could be effective in field settings.

Biological Control

Assessing the potential effects of fungicides on nontarget gut fungi (trichomycetes) and their associated larval black fly hosts

Fungicides are moderately hydrophobic and have been detected in water and sediment, particularly in agricultural watersheds, but typically are not included in routine water quality monitoring efforts. This is despite their widespread use and frequent application to combat fungal pathogens. Although the efficacy of these compounds on fungal pathogens is well documented, little is known about their effects on nontarget fungi. This pilot study, a field survey in southwestern Idaho from April to December 2010 on four streams with varying pesticide inputs (two agricultural and two reference sites), was conducted to assess nontarget impact of fungicides on gut fungi, or trichomycetes. Tissues of larval black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae), hosts of gut fungi, were analyzed for pesticide accumulation. Fungicides were detected in hosts from streams within agricultural watersheds but were not detected in hosts from reference streams. Gut fungi from agricultural sites exhibited decreased percent infestation, density and sporulation within the gut, and black fly tissues had elevated pesticide concentrations. Differences observed between the sites demonstrate a potential effect on this symbiotic system. Future research is needed to parse out the details of the complex biotic and abiotic relationships; however, these preliminary results indicate that impacts to nontarget organisms could have far-reaching consequences within aquatic ecosystems.

Journal of the American Water Resources Associatio