Kelley C. Boland | Search USGS

USGS2026

Carcass size and ground substrate drive detection rates of avian carcasses by human surveyors and a dog team

Accurate avian mortality estimates are essential for understanding anthropogenic impacts to bird populations and informing conservation strategies. Carcass surveys are commonly conducted by human surveyors or by detection dogs, but the factors influencing surveyor detection abilities have not been fully explored. In this study, we conducted two years of detection trials in the semi-arid high desert of southern New Mexico, USA, testing 27 human surveyors and one conservation detection dog across 1096 trials with 238 carcasses representing 50 avian species. We directly compared detection abilities between surveyor types (human and dog) and identified key factors influencing detection probabilities. The conservation detection dog exhibited a significantly higher detection probability (mean = 0.87) than human surveyors (mean = 0.49, individuals ranged 0.25–0.71), consistent with previous studies. Detection probabilities for both surveyor types were influenced by carcass size and ground substrate; detection probability was higher for larger carcasses and areas with lower vegetative complexity. We discuss our results in the context of common tradeoffs faced by managers in designing carcass surveys and how guidance may vary under different scenarios. Broadly, our study provides valuable insight that can enhance wildlife mortality monitoring, ensuring more accurate mortality estimates to inform management and conservation efforts.

New Mexico↗

USGS2025

Nocturnal flight call monitoring reveals in-flight behavioral alteration by avian migrants in response to artificial light at night

The world in which birds evolved to migrate has been drastically altered in the Anthropocene by artificial light. Sources of light such as urban centers or bright upward-facing lights attract migrants, altering their behavior, especially during inclement weather, often leading to mortality. Seemingly less extreme sources, such as pole-mounted floodlighting, ubiquitous throughout much of the world, have received comparatively less study, and migrant responses to such sources are poorly understood. We studied migrant behavior in relation to light at White Sands Missile Range (New Mexico, USA) by recording nocturnal flight calls at sites with and without lights during non-inclement weather. We collected 103,424 h of recordings and detected 2,851,863 calls over three fall migration seasons. We assessed how temporal, weather, and lighting variables explain variability in call rates between light and dark sites, and examined how different taxonomic groups behave in relation to light. Contrary to predictions, call rates were higher at dark sites than at light sites, and this difference was strongest early in the migration season. We found illuminated sites with a greater proportion of shielded lights, or with lights of higher dominant wavelengths (warmer color temperatures), had higher call rates (closely resembling dark sites) than other light sites, indicating that these factors may reduce impact to migrants. Our taxonomic analyses revealed consistent differences in call rate between light and dark sites for warblers, but no difference for most sparrows. Our findings indicate that lights alter behavior, but the use of “bird-friendly” lighting strategies may reduce this impact.

New Mexico↗