Geology topics

Karyn Tabor

Publications and source records attributed to Karyn Tabor.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

The Climate Hazards Center Infrared Precipitation with Stations, version 3

The Climate Hazards Center Infrared Precipitation with Stations (CHIRPS) data stream combines: (1) a high-resolution climatology, (2) thermal infrared (TIR) geostationary satellite observations, and (3) station observations. In the past, CHIRPS version 2 (CHIRPS2) has proven to be valuable for drought monitoring, hydrologic modeling, scientific studies and agricultural decision making. Version 3 (CHIRPS3) improves each of these components. The new version, CHIRPS3 extends to 60°S/N, adopts an improved variance-preserving TIR-to-precipitation estimation method, uses many more stations and station sources than the original CHIRPS2 product, and implements gauge-undercatch correction. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of satellite-only CHIRP3, CHIRP2, IMERG, PERSIANN- CCS, and GPI using high quality interpolated data in twelve regions with dense station coverage. CHIRP3 represents both the observed mean and variance more accurately than CHIRP2. A usage section in Morocco shows that CHIRPS3 better captures the observed rainfall variability when compared to CHIRPS2. This section also demonstrates how station data should be gauge-undercatch-corrected when validating CHIRPS3.

Scientific Data↗

USGS2026

Comparative crop yield forecasting using satellite-derived biophysical and agro-climatic predictors in Sub-Saharan Africa

Timely and accurate crop yield forecasting is central to food security early warning systems, particularly in climate-vulnerable regions. While operational forecasting frameworks commonly rely on precipitation and vegetation indices such as NDVI, their ability to provide actionable lead time remains limited. Here, we evaluate the added value of satellite-derived biophysical Essential Climate Variables (ECVs): Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR), for forecasting millet yield in Burkina Faso (BF) and maize yield in South Africa (ZA) and Malawi (MW). Using Random Forest models, we quantify forecast skill across the growing season at both national and sub-national scales. Results show that LAI and FAPAR provide effective forecast lead times of approximately 4 months in BF, 2 months in ZA, and up to 6 months in MW relative to harvest. At peak performance, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) reaches 19.8% (LAI) and 23.8% (FAPAR) in BF, 12.0% and 9.8% in ZA, and 21.8% and 20.8% in MW, respectively. Across countries, biophysical parameters often outperform NDVI and precipitation, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. At the sub-national level, LAI and FAPAR enable classification of administrative units into high and moderate-skill forecast units, revealing strong spatial heterogeneity linked to crop dominance. However, forecast skill declines where the target crop is not the dominant type, highlighting an important limitation for operational deployment. Overall, the findings suggest that satellite-derived biophysical parameters can provide earlier and more spatially resolved yield signals than commonly used predictors, with potential to improve the timeliness and effectiveness of food security early warning systems.

Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environme↗

USGS2014

Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation

In an effort to increase conservation effectiveness through the use of Earth observation technologies, a group of remote sensing scientists affiliated with government and academic institutions and conservation organizations identified 10 questions in conservation for which the potential to be answered would be greatly increased by use of remotely sensed data and analyses of those data. Our goals were to increase conservation practitioners’ use of remote sensing to support their work, increase collaboration between the conservation science and remote sensing communities, identify and develop new and innovative uses of remote sensing for advancing conservation science, provide guidance to space agencies on how future satellite missions can support conservation science, and generate support from the public and private sector in the use of remote sensing data to address the 10 conservation questions. We identified a broad initial list of questions on the basis of an email chain-referral survey. We then used a workshop-based iterative and collaborative approach to whittle the list down to these final questions (which represent 10 major themes in conservation): How can global Earth observation data be used to model species distributions and abundances? How can remote sensing improve the understanding of animal movements? How can remotely sensed ecosystem variables be used to understand, monitor, and predict ecosystem response and resilience to multiple stressors? How can remote sensing be used to monitor the effects of climate on ecosystems? How can near real-time ecosystem monitoring catalyze threat reduction, governance and regulation compliance, and resource management decisions? How can remote sensing inform configuration of protected area networks at spatial extents relevant to populations of target species and ecosystem services? How can remote sensing-derived products be used to value and monitor changes in ecosystem services? How can remote sensing be used to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of conservation efforts? How does the expansion and intensification of agriculture and aquaculture alter ecosystems and the services they provide? How can remote sensing be used to determine the degree to which ecosystems are being disturbed or degraded and the effects of these changes on species and ecosystem functions?

Conservation Biology↗