Geology topics

Jyoti Jennewein

Publications and source records attributed to Jyoti Jennewein.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2026

A practical model and online tool to predict cover crop nitrogen content and carbon-to-nitrogen ratio via remote sensing

Purpose: Estimations of cover crop (CC), nitrogen (N) content and carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio are crucial for guiding N fertilizer recommendations for subsequent cash crops, yet prediction tools that can be easily adopted by practitioners are lacking. This study aims to (1) develop models to predict CC N content and C:N ratio using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE) from Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAV) and satellite imagery, combined with growing degree days (GDD, base 5 °C) and CC species; and (2) integrate the models developed into an online application. Methods: Over 260 CC biomass samples were collected from 10 Pennsylvania counties in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed representing diverse species (triticale, cereal rye, wheat, brassicas, legumes, and mixtures). Four models were evaluated: (1) UAV NDVI + GDD + species, (2) UAV NDRE + GDD + species, (3) satellite NDVI + GDD + species, and (4) satellite NDRE + GDD + species. Results: Random forest models (R² > 0.74 for N content and R² > 0.86 for C:N ratio) generally outperformed generalized additive models (R² > 0.70 for N content and R² > 0.85 for C:N ratio) based on 10-fold cross validation. GDD and vegetation indices were the strongest predictors for N content, while GDD and species group influenced C:N ratio the most. In the independent site-years validation, UAV-NDRE performed best for predicting CC N content (R² = 0.82), and both UAV-based models (R² = 0.52) outperformed the satellite models for C:N ratio prediction. Conclusion: Random forest models accurately predicted CC N content and C:N ratio and were integrated into an online application to support precision agriculture practices.

Pennsylvania↗

USGS2026

The impacts of cover crop biomass on satellite-based detectability of cover crops in Maryland

Cover crop adoption in the U.S. has increased over the past decades, increasing the need to quantify their performance and environmental benefits. While remote sensing (RS)-based approaches for detecting cover crop presence have been developed, there has been limited research on how cover crops with varied biomass and management practices influence detectability. Using unique field-level cover crop presence and biomass datasets in Maryland, U.S., we investigated how RS-based detectability changes for cover crops with varied aboveground biomass, planting, and termination dates. Specifically, we proposed a time-integrated satellite-based greenness feature from Harmonized Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 (HLS) time series from 2017 to 2021 to estimate biomass of cover crops and evaluated their detectability using a phenology-based cover crop detection framework. The impacts of cover crop planting and termination dates on cover crop biomass were also analyzed. Our results demonstrated that Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) estimated biomass with higher accuracy compared to other vegetation indices, and the time-integrated model estimated biomass with higher accuracy than the single-date “snapshot” linear model (R2 from 0.53 to 0.66 and RMSE from 922 kg/ha to 747 kg/ha). While the snapshot models were species sensitive, the time-integrated models showed strong robustness across different species. Detectability increased with cover crop biomass, as detected cover crops averaged 963.3 ±719.5 kg/ha compared to 297.2 ± 209.0 kg/ha for non-detected cover crops. Detection accuracy reached 96.1% for fields exceeding 500 kg/ha, compared with an overall accuracy of 62.7%. Earlier planting and later termination increased biomass and detectability, with biomass rising by 4.14 kg/ha/day (p < 0.01). This study demonstrates how management practices affect cover crop biomass and detectability via satellite time series and provides insights that can inform management of cover crops and monitoring of their effects on agroecosystems.

Maryland↗

USGS2026

Mapping winter cover crops using remote sensing of crop phenology

Winter cover crops (WCC) are an effective agricultural conservation practice for improving soil health and water quality. Several U.S. states have established incentive programs to promote planting WCC between cash crop rotations. In recent years, the area planted with WCC has steadily increased due to these efforts, although the planting area varies among states. Since these programs are largely led by individual counties or state programs, there is no centralized data repository that quantifies the total WCC planted annually or their locations. Therefore, there is a practical need to identify fields that have been planted with WCC, as well as to quantify the total planted area both during and after the growing season. Furthermore, incentive programs often require verification that WCC were planted to release payments to participating growers in a timely manner. Satellite remote sensing time series can provide information on WCC growth status. However, it remains unclear what kind of WCC the remote sensing data detects. For example, separating WCC from weeds and winter commodity crops remains a challenge. Additionally, a binary classification of WCC presence and absence cannot accurately describe the category and performance of the WCC. This paper presents a new remote sensing phenology-based approach to map WCC likelihood. We assessed model predictions of WCC likelihood using WCC planting records and ground observations over fields at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) from 2018 to 2024. Regional WCC maps were assessed using the Maryland Department of Agriculture's records of WCC fields enrolled in the 2019 and 2020 incentive programs. Our results show that the balanced overall accuracy for WCC and non-WCC ranges from 75% to 85% but could exceed 90%, with limited training samples. However, the high accuracy of WCC corresponds with low accuracy for non-WCC due to confusion with weeds and perennial grasses. Early-season detection yields promising results, with overall accuracies comparable to late-season detection. The after-season detection can differentiate between winter cereal grain cash crops and incentive WCC based on the ending date of the growing season. With a small set of WCC samples and management information, the phenology-based mapping approach offers a rapid and scalable solution for mapping WCC over a large region during or after each WCC growing season.

Maryland↗

USGS2025

Satellite assessment of winter cover crop and conservation tillage outcomes to support adaptive management in working landscapes

The use of winter cover crops and conservation tillage are agricultural practices promoted to reduce nutrient and sediment loss from cropland, improve soil health, increase infiltration, and support farm nutrient cycling and ecosystem services. However, environmental performance of these practices is variable in the working farm landscape. The Lower Chesapeake Bay research project within the USDA Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network has collaboratively developed satellite remote sensing algorithms to measure the performance and phenology of winter cover crops (aboveground biomass, nitrogen content, fractional cover, and emergence and termination dates) using no-cost Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 multispectral satellite imagery. This research supports annual operational assessment of >28,000 fields per year in four states. Results document the impacts of agronomic management on conservation outcomes, support adaptive management of incentive payment structures, and can reduce the workload for conservation district staff by remotely verifying cover crop management. Additionally, super-spectral satellite applications have been developed to accurately map crop residue cover by measuring lignocellulose absorption in shortwave infrared wavelengths, producing a 7-year time series of tillage intensity maps for the Delmarva Peninsula. These remote sensing products can be used in decision support and modeling to estimate changes in nutrient, sediment, and carbon cycling resulting from conservation practice implementation in the working farm landscape. This manuscript provides an overview of remote sensing research findings and applications associated with the USDA LTAR and Conservation Effects Assessment Projects (CEAP), documenting a variety of previously published outcomes with update and expansion of techniques using additional unpublished data and analyses as appropriate.

Maryland↗

USGS2024

Intercomparison of same-day remote sensing data for measuring winter cover crop biophysical traits

Winter cover crops are planted during the fall to reduce nitrogen losses and soil erosion and improve soil health. Accurate estimations of winter cover crop performance and biophysical traits including biomass and fractional vegetative groundcover support accurate assessment of environmental benefits. We examined the comparability of measurements between ground-based and spaceborne sensors as well as between processing levels (e.g., surface vs. top-of-atmosphere reflectance) in estimating cover crop biophysical traits. This research examined the relationships between SPOT 5, Landsat 7, and WorldView-2 same-day paired satellite imagery and handheld multispectral proximal sensors on two days during the 2012–2013 winter cover crop season. We compared two processing levels from three satellites with spatially aggregated proximal data for red and green spectral bands as well as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). We then compared NDVI estimated fractional green cover to in-situ photographs, and we derived cover crop biomass estimates from NDVI using existing calibration equations. We used slope and intercept contrasts to test whether estimates of biomass and fractional green cover differed statistically between sensors and processing levels. Compared to top-of-atmosphere imagery, surface reflectance imagery were more closely correlated with proximal sensors, with intercepts closer to zero, regression slopes nearer to the 1:1 line, and less variance between measured values. Additionally, surface reflectance NDVI derived from satellites showed strong agreement with passive handheld multispectral proximal sensor-sensor estimated fractional green cover and biomass (adj. R 2 = 0.96 and 0.95; RMSE = 4.76% and 259 kg ha−1, respectively). Although active handheld multispectral proximal sensor-sensor derived fractional green cover and biomass estimates showed high accuracies (R 2 = 0.96 and 0.96, respectively), they also demonstrated large intercept offsets (−25.5 and 4.51, respectively). Our results suggest that many passive multispectral remote sensing platforms may be used interchangeably to assess cover crop biophysical traits whereas SPOT 5 required an adjustment in NDVI intercept. Active sensors may require separate calibrations or intercept correction prior to combination with passive sensor data. Although surface reflectance products were highly correlated with proximal sensors, the standardized cloud mask failed to completely capture cloud shadows in Landsat 7, which dampened the signal of NIR and red bands in shadowed pixels.

Maryland↗