Geology topics

Julia C. Brockman

Publications and source records attributed to Julia C. Brockman.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2025

The effects of breeding status on common raven movement, home range, and habitat selection

Anthropogenic infrastructure has contributed to increasing common raven ( Corvus corax ) abundance across the Great Basin region of the United States, particularly in sagebrush ecosystems, where high raven densities are correlated with reduced sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ) nest survival. Our understanding of how raven reproductive behavior affects sage-grouse nest predation is limited, especially considering their overlapping breeding seasons. Understanding differences in space use and resource selection between breeding and non-breeding ravens could help identify high-use areas and corresponding predation risk for sage-grouse nests. We analyzed space use and resource selection of breeding ( n = 13) and non-breeding ( n = 32) global positioning system (GPS)-marked ravens in Nevada, USA (2017–2022) during the breeding season (1 March–31 June). We compared home-range size, core area size, step lengths, and resource selection within a Bayesian framework with inference made by comparing Bayesian credible intervals (CRI). We generated home range and core area estimates using autocorrelated kernel density methods. We did not find a difference in home range size between breeding (469.33 km 2 , 95% CRI = 228.79–709.45 km 2 ) and non-breeding (525.26 km 2 , 95% CRI = 410.71–654.10 km 2 ) ravens. However, breeding ravens had smaller core areas (10.77 km 2 , 95% CRI = 3.16–35.78 km 2 ) and shorter step lengths (1,160.33 m/hr, 95% CRI = 1,087.78–1,277.17 m/hr) than non-breeding ravens (core area = 279.50 km 2 , 95% CRI = 206.77–363.72 km 2 ; step length = 1,953.74 m/hr, 95% CRI = 1,898.42–2,009.56 m/hr). Ravens in both breeding classes selected high normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and low annual grass and shrub cover, but non-breeding ravens showed stronger selection for low annual grass and shrub cover areas. We found strong differences in selection between breeding classes for 6 of our 9 covariates: distance to road, solar radiation, distance to natural water, distance to forest edge, percent annual grass cover, and percent shrub cover. Non-breeding ravens concentrated activity near forest edges, natural water sources, and anthropogenic features, whereas breeding ravens focused activity close to their nests. Our findings suggest that raven management could be more effective if it targeted areas with high NDVI and low annual grass and shrub cover, especially in anthropogenically modified landscapes and near forest edges, and prevented raven nest establishment near prey populations of concern.

Nevada↗

USGS2023

A hierarchical modelling framework for estimating individual- and population-level reproductive success from movement data

Rapidly advancing animal telemetry technologies paired with new statistical models can provide insight into the behaviour of otherwise unobservable free-living animals. Changes in behaviour apparent from pairing telemetry with statistical models often occur as animals undertake key life-history activities, such as reproduction. For many species that are secretive or occupy remote areas, these life-history events are difficult to detect with conventional survey techniques, and consequently, vital rates are difficult to estimate. We present a hierarchical modelling framework, which integrates movement data observed via animal-borne telemetry and optional, infrequent survey data, to estimate individual- and population-level reproductive success. The approach combines a mechanistic movement model and survival model, and allows for assessing the effects of hypothesized individual and environmental covariates on reproductive success. We first tested our approach with simulated data, and then applied it to movement data from migratory golden eagles ( Aquila chrysaetos) breeding in southcentral Alaska across four breeding seasons. We show that results supported our biological hypotheses that changes in movement coincided with the timing of reproductive failures, and that changes in movement could be used to assess breeding success (and failure) at the individual and population levels. The analysis also provided evidence of inter-annual variation in population-level nest success and the timing of nesting failures. This new approach is adaptable to many species that care for young and can be tracked with telemetry devices, and can provide not only individual-level information useful for testing ecological hypotheses, but estimates of demographic parameters that can directly inform conservation and management if tagged animals are representative of the population.

Methods in Ecology and Evolution↗

USGS2021

Inter- and intra-annual effects of lethal removal on common raven abundance in Nevada and California, USA

Populations of common ravens ( Corvus corax ; ravens) have increased rapidly within sagebrush ( Artemisia spp.) ecosystems between 1960 and 2020. Although ravens are native to North America, their population densities have expanded to levels that negatively influence the population dynamics of other wildlife species of conservation concern, such as greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ) and desert tortoises ( Gopherus agassizii ). For this reason, lethal removal, such as the application of the avicide DRC-1339, has been used to manage raven numbers at local scales and under certain circumstances. Because the relative effectiveness of DRC-1339 in reducing raven populations densities is not thoroughly understood, we completed 2 case studies using a before-after-control-impact experimental design of density estimates generated from point count data within a Bayesian hierarchical distance sampling framework. Specifically, we analyzed >16,000 point count surveys collected during 2009–2019 and split into 2 study designs covering multiple field sites within the Great Basin region. The first experiment evaluated intra-annual changes in density by comparing before and after treatment time periods within a single breeding season for multiple treatment regions compared to 2 control regions. The other experiment focused on inter-annual differences by comparing time periods across years before and after the onset of annual avicide application for a single treatment region compared to multiple control regions. Our models estimated a 100% probability of decline in density relative to control sites for both the intra- and inter-annual model designs. At treatment sites, expected densities of ravens varied but were reduced by 43% (95% CRI: 33–49%) and 54% (95% CRI: 24–71%) according to intra- and inter-annual analyses, respectively, whereas densities increased by 42% (95% CRI: 27–60%) and 15% (95% CRI: -17 to 58%) at control sites. Although population densities were reduced with treatments, trends indicated that sustained effort would likely be needed to maintain densities at acceptable levels within regions of interest. Effectively reducing the adverse effects of raven populations on other native species likely will depend on a variety of targeted management actions such as improving habitat quality for prey species, possibly reducing ravens’ population density, and treating the cause of increased raven abundance to reduce future carrying capacity and prevent rebounds.

California, Nevada↗