Geology topics

Jody Brae Wycech

Publications and source records attributed to Jody Brae Wycech.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

USGS2025

Avak Creek oil occurrence, North Slope, Alaska: Newly discovered oil seep on Native lands, near village of Utqiagvik

An unknown occurrence of oil was detected near Avak Creek on Native lands on the North Slope of Alaska. Determining the source of oil was imperative for allowing stakeholders (Federal, State, and local government agencies and the landowner, an Alaska Native corporation) to make timely and informed decisions and mount a mitigation response, if required. The regional and local geological framework of the Avak Creek site was constructed using seismic surveys, well data, and basin modeling results, to identify local petroleum systems, map structural geometry and faults, define source rock thermal maturity distributions, and infer likely oil-migration pathways. Molecular hydrocarbon fingerprints (biomarkers, diamondoids, compound-specific isotopes) of the oil were compared to those of local and regional oil seeps, exploration well tests, and produced oils. Biomarker acid distributions characterized the history and extent of petroleum biodegradation. Integrating subsurface and geochemical parameters, the oil is interpreted to be a natural seep generated locally, predominantly from the Brookian Lower Cretaceous Hue Shale/gamma-ray zone, rather than an anthropogenic source of pollution. Results highlight sophisticated analytical technologies used to characterize complex, compositionally altered hydrocarbons. Results also advance our understanding of Brookian source rock distribution, subsurface petroleum migration pathways, and Arctic Alaska petroleum systems.

Alaska↗

USGS2024

Discovery of giant and conventional magnetofossils bookending Cretaceous Oceanic Anoxic Event 2

Conventional magnetofossils are the remains of magnetotactic bacteria and giant magnetofossils are the remains of iron biomineralizing organisms that have not yet been identified. We report the oldest robust conventional and giant magnetofossil records, ~97 Ma, from marine sediments drilled in Holland Park, Virginia, USA. The Holland Park core records the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary and Oceanic-Anoxic Event 2 (OAE2). Magnetic datasets indicate single domain magnetite within the clay-rich sediments bookending OAE2. Electron microscopy images from these intervals highlight conventional and giant magnetofossil morphologies, including three potentially new giant magnetofossil morphologies: seeds, squash, and spades. There is an overall high abundance and morphological disparity of magnetofossils at Holland Park. However, we observe abundance, disparity, and preservation changes between the magnetofossil assemblages bookending OAE2. Our observations provide clues toward understanding the ecological thresholds of the enigmatic organisms that produce giant magnetofossils and evidence that magnetofossils may be widely distributed in the geologic record.

Virginia↗

USGS2023

Comparison of δ13C analyses of individual foraminifer (Orbulina universa) shells by secondary ion mass spectrometry and gas source mass spectrometry

Rationale: The use of secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to perform micrometer-scale in situ carbon isotope (δ 13 C) analyses of shells of marine microfossils called planktic foraminifers holds promise to explore calcification and ecological processes. The potential of this technique, however, cannot be realized without comparison to traditional whole-shell δ 13 C values measured by gas source mass spectrometry (GSMS). Methods: Paired SIMS and GSMS δ 13 C values measured from final chamber fragments of the same shell of the planktic foraminifer Orbulina universa are compared. The SIMS–GSMS δ 13 C differences (Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS ) were determined via paired analysis of hydrogen peroxide-cleaned fragments of modern cultured specimens and of fossil specimens from deep-sea sediments that were either untreated, sonicated, and cleaned with hydrogen peroxide or vacuum roasted. After treatment, fragments were analyzed by a CAMECA IMS 1280 SIMS instrument and either a ThermoScientific MAT-253 or a Fisons Optima isotope ratio mass spectrometer (GSMS). Results: Paired analyses of cleaned fragments of cultured specimens ( n = 7) yield no SIMS–GSMS δ 13 C difference. However, paired analyses of untreated ( n = 18) and cleaned ( n = 12) fragments of fossil shells yield average Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS values of 0.8‰ and 0.6‰ (±0.2‰, 2 SE), respectively, while vacuum roasting of fossil shell fragments ( n = 11) removes the SIMS–GSMS δ 13 C difference. Conclusions: The noted Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS values are most likely due to matrix effects causing sample–standard mismatch for SIMS analyses but may also be a combination of other factors such as SIMS measurement of chemically bound water. The volume of material analyzed via SIMS is ~10 5 times smaller than that analyzed by GSMS; hence, the extent to which these Δ 13 C SIMS-GSMS values represent differences in analyte or instrument factors remains unclear.

Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry↗