Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Jinzhong Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Jinzhong Liu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Study of thermochemical sulfate reduction mechanism using compound specific sulfur isotope analysis

The sulfur isotopic fractionation associated with the formation of organic sulfur compounds (OSCs) during thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) was studied using gold-tube pyrolysis experiments to simulate TSR. The reactants used included n -hexadecane ( n -C 16 ) as a model organic compound with sulfate, sulfite, or elemental sulfur as the sulfur source. At the end of each experiment, the S-isotopic composition and concentration of remaining sulfate, H 2 S, benzothiophene, dibenzothiophene, and 2-phenylthiophene (PT) were measured. The observed S-isotopic fractionations between sulfate and BT, DBT, and H 2 S in experimental simulations of TSR correlate well with a multi-stage model of the overall TSR process. Large kinetic isotope fractionations occur during the first, uncatalyzed stage of TSR, 12.4‰ for H 2 S and as much as 22.2‰ for BT. The fractionations decrease as the H 2 S concentration increases and the reaction enters the second, catalyzed stage. Once all of the oxidizable hydrocarbons have been consumed, sulfate reduction ceases and equilibrium partitioning then dictates the fractionation between H 2 S and sulfate (∼17‰). Experiments involving sparingly soluble CaSO 4 show that during the second catalytic phase of TSR the rate of sulfate reduction exceeds that of sulfate dissolution. In this case, there is no apparent isotopic fractionation between source sulfate and generated H 2 S, as all of the available sulfate is effectively reduced at all reaction times. When CaSO 4 is replaced with fully soluble Na 2 SO 4 , sulfate dissolution is no longer rate limiting and significant S-isotopic fractionation is observed. This supports the notion that CaSO 4 dissolution can lead to the apparent lack of fractionation between H 2 S and sulfate produced by TSR in nature. The S-isotopic composition of individual OSCs record information related to geochemical reactions that cannot be discerned from the δ 34 S values obtained from bulk phases such as H 2 S, oil, and sulfate minerals, and provide important mechanistic details about the overall TSR process.

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta↗

Inter-laboratory calibration of natural gas round robins for δ 2 H and δ 13 C using off-line and on-line techniques

Compound-specific carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of three natural gas round robins were calibrated by ten laboratories carrying out more than 800 measurements including both on-line and off-line methods. Two-point calibrations were performed with international measurement standards for hydrogen isotope ratios (VSMOW and SLAP) and carbon isotope ratios (NBS 19 and L-SVEC CO 2 ). The consensus δ 13 C values and uncertainties were derived from the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) based on off-line measurements; the consensus δ 2 H values and uncertainties were derived from MLE of both off-line and on-line measurements, taking the bias of on-line measurements into account. The calibrated consensus values in ‰ relative to VSMOW and VPDB are: NG1 (coal-related gas): Methane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 185.1‰ ± 1.2‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 34.18‰ ± 0.10‰ Ethane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 156.3‰ ± 1.8‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 24.66‰ ± 0.11‰ Propane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 143.6‰ ± 3.3‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 22.21‰ ± 0.11‰ i-Butane: δ 13 C VPDB = − 21.62‰ ± 0.12‰ n-Butane: δ 13 C VPDB = − 21.74‰ ± 0.13‰ CO2: δ 13 C VPDB = − 5.00‰ ± 0.12‰ NG2 (biogas): Methane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 237.0‰ ± 1.2‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 68.89‰ ± 0.12‰ NG3 (oil-related gas): Methane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 167.6‰ ± 1.0‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 43.61‰ ± 0.09‰ Ethane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 164.1‰ ± 2.4‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 40.24‰ ± 0.10‰ Propane: δ 2 H VSMOW = − 138.4‰ ± 3.0‰, δ 13 C VPDB = − 33.79‰ ± 0.09‰ All of the assigned values are traceable to the international carbon isotope standard of VPDB and hydrogen isotope standard of VSMOW.

Chemical Geology↗