Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Jessica E. Sanow

Publications and source records attributed to Jessica E. Sanow.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Snow surface roughness across spatio-temporal scales

The snow surface is at the interface between the atmosphere and Earth. The surface of the snowpack changes due to its interaction with precipitation, wind, humidity, short- and long-wave radiation, underlying terrain characteristics, and land cover. These connections create a dynamic snow surface that impacts the energy and mass balance of the snowpack, blowing snow potential, and other snowpack processes. Despite this, the snow surface is generally considered a constant parameter in many Earth system models. Data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Cold Land Processes Experiment (CLPX) collected in 2002 and 2003 across northern Colorado were used to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of snow surface roughness. The random roughness (RR) and fractal dimension (D) metrics used in this investigation are well correlated. However, roughness is not correlated across scales, computed here from snow roughness boards at a millimeter resolution and airborne lidar at a meter resolution. Process scale differences were found based on land cover at each of the two measurement scales, as appraised through measurements in the forest and alpine.

Colorado

Geometric versus anemometric surface roughness for a shallow accumulating snowpack

When applied to a snow-covered surface, aerodynamic roughness length, z 0 , is typically considered as a static parameter within energy balance equations. However, field observations show that z 0 changes spatially and temporally, and thus z 0 incorporated as a dynamic parameter may greatly improve models. To evaluate methods for characterizing snow surface roughness, we compared concurrent estimates of z 0 based on (1) terrestrial light detection and ranging derived surface geometry of the snowpack surface (geometric, z 0 G ) and (2) vertical wind profile measurements (anemometric, z 0 A ). The value of z 0 G was computed from Lettau’s equation and underestimated z 0 A but compared well when scaled by a factor of 2.34. The Counihan method for computing z 0 G was found to be unsuitable for estimating z 0 on a snow surface. During snowpack accumulation in early winter, z 0 varied as a function of the snow-covered area (SCA). Our results show that as the SCA increases, z 0 decreases, indicating there is a topographic influence on this relation.

Geosciences