Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Jesse R. Barber

Publications and source records attributed to Jesse R. Barber.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Experimentally quantifying how long recreation noise displaces mammals: Recovery over weeks to months varies by disturbance type and species tolerance

Outdoor recreation is expanding across public lands, yet managers lack evidence for how long wildlife responses to recreation persist and whether response duration depends on disturbance type and frequency. Using a field-based acoustic playback experiment in the Bridger–Teton National Forest, Wyoming, USA, we isolated recreation noise from other components of human presence and quantified how long mammal detections took to return to baseline. Across 12 sites over two field seasons, we broadcast motorized and non-motorized recreation sounds at rates mimicking high- and low-use trails, paired with nature-sound controls. We quantified treatment effects as deviations from expected weekly detections at our control sites, defining time-to-return as the first week when deviations overlapped zero. Response duration differed between disturbance types. High-rate motorized playbacks produced the longest suppression: all species except mule deer did not return to baseline within our 15-week season, whereas mule deer recovered by six weeks. For high-rate non-motorized playbacks, all species except for mule deer had suppressed detections until seven weeks while mule deer detections were not different from baseline. For low-rate non-motorized playbacks, mule deer detections returned to baseline at nine weeks while all other species returned to baseline at seven weeks. Species differences indicate that apparent overall recovery can mask prolonged avoidance by less tolerant taxa. Recreation effects persisted for weeks to months and varied with disturbance type and exposure frequency, highlighting how temporal patterns of use influence wildlife responses and where recreational planning of spatial refugia or seasonal restrictions could reduce impacts on sensitive species.

Wyoming↗

Artificial nightlight alters the predator-prey dynamics of an apex carnivore

Artificial nightlight is increasingly recognized as an important environmental disturbance that influences the habitats and fitness of numerous species. However, its effects on wide‐ranging vertebrates and their interactions remain unclear. Light pollution has the potential to amplify land‐use change, and as such, answering the question of how this sensory stimulant affects behavior and habitat use of species valued for their ecological roles and economic impacts is critical for conservation and land‐use planning. Here, we combined satellite‐derived estimates of light pollution, with GPS‐data from cougars Puma concolor (n = 56), mule deer Odocoileus hemionus (n = 263) and locations of cougar‐killed deer (n = 1562 carcasses), to assess the effects of light exposure on mammal behavior and predator–prey relationships across wildland–urban gradients in the southwestern United States. Our results indicate that deer used the anthropogenic environments to access forage and were more active at night than their wildland conspecifics. Despite higher nightlight levels, cougars killed deer at the wildland–urban interface, but hunted them in the relatively darkest locations. Light had the greatest effect of all covariates on where cougars killed deer at the wildland–urban interface. Both species exhibited functional responses to light pollution at fine scales; individual cougars and deer with less light exposure increasingly avoided illuminated areas when exposed to greater radiance, whereas deer living in the wildland–urban interface selected elevated light levels. We conclude that integrating estimates of light pollution into ecological studies provides crucial insights into how the dynamic human footprint can alter animal behavior and ecosystem function across spatial scales.

Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New ↗