Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

J.A. Boohar

Publications and source records attributed to J.A. Boohar.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Water resources data, Nebraska, water year 1989

Water resources data for the 1989 water year for Nebraska consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality in wells. This report contains discharge records for 160 streamflow gaging stations, 12 partial-record or miscellaneous streamflow stations, and 5 crest-stage, partial-record streamflow stations; stage and contents records for 11 lakes and reservoirs; water-quality records for 38 streamflow stations, 8 ungaged stream-sites, and 159 wells; and water-level records for 55 observation wells. These data represent that part of the National Water-Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in Nebraska.

Nebraska↗

Cost-effectiveness of the stream-gaging program in Nebraska

This report documents the results of a study of the cost-effectiveness of the streamflow information program in Nebraska. Presently, 145 continuous surface-water stations are operated in Nebraska on a budget of $908,500. Data uses and funding sources are identified for each of the 145 stations. Data from most stations have multiple uses. All stations have sufficient justification for continuation, but two stations primarily are used in short-term research studies; their continued operation needs to be evaluated when the research studies end. The present measurement frequency produces an average standard error for instantaneous discharges of about 12 percent, including periods when stage data are missing. Altering the travel routes and the measurement frequency will allow a reduction in standard error of about 1 percent with the present budget. Standard error could be reduced to about 8 percent if lost record could be eliminated. A minimum budget of $822,000 is required to operate the present network, but operations at that funding level would result in an increase in standard error to about 16 percent. The maximum budget analyzed was $1,363,000, which would result in an average standard error of 6 percent. (USGS)

Water-Resources Investigations Report↗