Hilary Stuart-Williams

USGS2023

Linking water use efficiency with water use strategy from leaves to communities

Limitations and utility of three measures of water use characteristics were evaluated: water use efficiency (WUE), intrinsic WUE and marginal water cost of carbon gain ( aE/aA ) estimated, respectively, as ratios of assimilation ( A ) to transpiration ( E ), of A to stomatal conductance ( g s ) and of sensitivities of E and A with variation in g s . Only the measure aE/aA estimates water use strategy in a way that integrates carbon gain relative to water use under varying environmental conditions across scales from leaves to communities. This insight provides updated and simplified ways of estimating aE/aA and adds depth to understanding ways that plants balance water expenditure against carbon gain, uniquely providing a mechanistic means of predicting water use characteristics under changing environmental scenarios.

New Phytologist↗

USGS2009

Comprehensive inter-laboratory calibration of reference materials for δ18O versus VSMOW using various on-line high-temperature conversion techniques

Internationally distributed organic and inorganic oxygen isotopic reference materials have been calibrated by six laboratories carrying out more than 5300 measurements using a variety of high-temperature conversion techniques (HTC) in an evaluation sponsored by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). To aid in the calibration of these reference materials, which span more than 125‰, an artificially enriched reference water ( δ 18 O of +78.91‰) and two barium sulfates (one depleted and one enriched in 18 O) were prepared and calibrated relative to VSMOW2 and SLAP reference waters. These materials were used to calibrate the other isotopic reference materials in this study, which yielded: Reference material δ 18 O and estimated combined uncertainty IAEA-602 benzoic acid +71.28 ± 0.36‰ USGS35 sodium nitrate +56.81 ± 0.31‰ IAEA-NO-3 potassium nitrate +25.32 ± 0.29‰ IAEA-601 benzoic acid +23.14 ± 0.19‰ IAEA-SO-5 barium sulfate +12.13 ± 0.33‰ NBS 127 barium sulfate +8.59 ± 0.26‰ VSMOW2 water 0‰ IAEA-600 caffeine −3.48 ± 0.53‰ IAEA-SO-6 barium sulfate −11.35 ± 0.31‰ USGS34 potassium nitrate −27.78 ± 0.37‰ SLAP water −55.5‰ The seemingly large estimated combined uncertainties arise from differences in instrumentation and methodology and difficulty in accounting for all measurement bias. They are composed of the 3-fold standard errors directly calculated from the measurements and provision for systematic errors discussed in this paper. A primary conclusion of this study is that nitrate samples analyzed for δ 18 O should be analyzed with internationally distributed isotopic nitrates, and likewise for sulfates and organics. Authors reporting relative differences of oxygen-isotope ratios ( δ 18 O) of nitrates, sulfates, or organic material should explicitly state in their reports the δ 18 O values of two or more internationally distributed nitrates (USGS34, IAEA-NO-3, and USGS35), sulfates (IAEA-SO-5, IAEA-SO-6, and NBS 127), or organic material (IAEA-601 benzoic acid, IAEA-602 benzoic acid, and IAEA-600 caffeine), as appropriate to the material being analyzed, had these reference materials been analyzed with unknowns. This procedure ensures that readers will be able to normalize the δ 18 O values at a later time should it become necessary. The high-temperature reduction technique for analyzing δ 18 O and δ 2 H is not as widely applicable as the well-established combustion technique for carbon and nitrogen stable isotope determination. To obtain the most reliable stable isotope data, materials should be treated in an identical fashion; within the same sequence of analyses, samples should be compared with working reference materials that are as similar in nature and in isotopic composition as feasible.

Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry↗

USGS2004

A precise method for the analysis of δ18O of dissolved inorganic phosphate in seawater

A method for preparation and analysis of the oxygen isotope composition (δ 18 O) of dissolved inorganic phosphate (DIP) has been developed and preliminary results for water samples from various locations are reported. Phosphate is extracted from seawater samples by coprecipitation with magnesium hydroxide. Phosphate is further purified through a series of precipitations and resin separation and is ultimately converted to silver phosphate. Silver phosphate samples are pyrolitically decomposed to carbon monoxide and analyzed for δ 18 O. Silver phosphate samples weighing 0.7 mg (3.5 µmol oxygen) can be analyzed routinely with an average standard deviation of about 0.3‰. There is no isotope fractionation during extraction and blanks are negligible within analytical error. Reproducibility was determined for both laboratory standards and natural samples by multiple analyses. A comparison between filtered and unfiltered natural seawater samples was also conducted and no appreciable difference was observed for the samples tested. The δ 18 O values of DIP in seawater determined using this method range from 18.6‰ to 22.3‰, suggesting small but detectable natural variability in seawater. For the San Francisco Bay estuary DIP δ 18 O is more variable, ranging from 11.4‰ near the San Joaquin River to 20.1‰ near the Golden Gate Bridge, and was well correlated with salinity, phosphate concentration, and δ 18 O of water.

California↗