Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Genna Raine Chiaro

Publications and source records attributed to Genna Raine Chiaro.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

An extensive and short-lived episode of mid-Holocene fayalite- bearing high-silica rhyolite eruptions at Mono Craters, California

Having last erupted ~ 700 years ago, the Mono Craters volcanic chain is an active system with a history of explosive and effusive high-silica rhyolite eruptions. Approximately ~ 30 lava domes and flows range from ~ 42 to ~ 0.7 ka, form a ~ 15 km curvilinear trend, and change mineralogy (biotite-, orthopyroxene-, or fayalite-bearing) and crystallinity through time. However, the eruptive chronology of this system is incompletely understood. We report new 238 U- 230 Th isochron ages for nine fayalite-bearing domes from paired zircon and allanite crystal surfaces that reveal a major shift in eruptive frequency and volume over the history of the chain, with extrusion of > 0.45 km 3 of high-silica rhyolite lava between 7.1 and 5.2 ka. This contrasts with older biotite- (~ 42–20 ka) and orthopyroxene-bearing (~ 12–9 ka) domes, each of which erupted smaller volumes over a more protracted period. Whole-rock compositions suggest these older domes tapped separate domains within a shared magmatic system because the former are higher in Sr and Ba whereas the latter are lower in SiO 2 , higher in Zr, and more enriched in light rare-earth elements. Titanomagnetite chemistry and zircon saturation temperatures also reflect changing magma compositions and conditions associated with these domes. Fayalite-bearing domes, in contrast, have uniform whole-rock and titanomagnetite compositions which support rapid extrusion of magma over an interval short enough to prevent Fe-Ti oxides from recording any changes in magmatic conditions. The youngest lavas were also produced in a short-lived episode ~ 700 years ago, showing that multivent, geologically brief eruptive episodes occur repeatedly at Mono Craters.

California↗

An assessment of the quality of microanalysis of natural silicate glass using scanning electron microscope-based energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS)

The composition of volcanic glass records important clues into the origin and evolution of magmatic systems. However, the analysis of volcanic glass presents challenges when performed using electron-beam techniques, particularly due to Na mobility. While microanalysis of geological materials is usually performed using electron probe microanalyzer-based wavelength-dispersive spectrometry (EPMA-WDS), we present here results of glass analysis using energy-dispersive spectrometry with a scanning electron microscope (SEM-EDS). We use three U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) whole-rock reference materials (i.e., RGM-1, STM-1, QLO-1) that were fused into glass using a double-fusion technique. Results for 12 sessions over two months using the SEM-EDS reveal excellent reproducibility, agreement with the expected values for RGM-1 and STM-1, and excellent counting statistics when using live acquisition times of 15 s; results for QLO-1 suggest that the fused material is somewhat inhomogeneous. For longer acquisition times (30, 60, 90 s), significant Na migration is observed; we conclude that minimal Na migration takes place with acquisition times of 15 s using our analytical instrumentation. We also compile data for RGM-1 obtained using the same instrument over the last decade, and we further demonstrate the reliability of SEM-EDS for microanalysis of silicate glasses. Comparison of our results with EPMA-WDS results for a range of reference materials published by researchers at the USGS Alaska Volcano Observatory suggest that both EPMA-WDS and SEM-EDS can yield adequate analysis of volcanic glass, but SEM-EDS can potentially lead to higher precision for major elements (>1 wt.% concentration), while EPMA-WDS typically leads to higher precision for minor elements. The higher precision of SEM-EDS results for major elements, combined with the more widespread distribution, lower usage cost, and higher ease of use of such systems, makes analysis via SEM-EDS an attractive option for measuring major-element compositions of volcanic glass. However, it is critical to test the quality of each instrument given differences in hardware and software between SEM and EDS systems.

American Mineralogist↗