Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Erik Roger Tharalson

Publications and source records attributed to Erik Roger Tharalson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Quantitative mineral resource assessment of lithium pegmatite deposits in the northern Appalachian orogen, USA

Lithium demand is projected to increase more than 48 times by 2040 due to electric vehicle production and other energy storage needs. Most lithium production is outside of the USA, thereby increasing supply chain vulnerability. The combined end use importance and heightened supply risk of lithium make this lightest metallic element a critical commodity to the USA. To mitigate this supply risk, the US Geological Survey is actively assessing lithium deposits in the USA. Herein, we detail an assessment for lithium-mineralized pegmatites in the US northern Appalachian Mountains. Permissive tracts were generated by cross-referencing tectonic and geologic maps and mineral occurrence data with mappable criteria derived from generalized and region-specific lithium pegmatite ore deposit models; tracts were then ranked as having high, medium, or low permissibility. Available geophysical and geochemical data were found to be of minimal utility for this deposit type at the scale of the assessment. The number of undiscovered deposits were estimated and integrated into probabilistic simulations, which included an expanded and updated global grade and tonnage model of pegmatite-hosted lithium ore. The estimated total amount of undiscovered resources for the northern Appalachian Orogen has a median value of 1,410,000 metric tons of Li 2 O when considering moderate correlation across sub-regions. At a confidence level of 90%, a resource of at least 90,000 metric tons of Li 2 O remains undiscovered, and at a 10% confidence level, a resource of as much as 7,380,000 metric tons Li 2 O remains undiscovered. After applying an up-to-date economic filter to convert median contained lithium to recoverable material, a correlated total of 900,000 metric tons of Li 2 O may be economically extractable, equating to enough Li 2 O to provide the current annual US lithium supply deficit (presently obtained through net imports) for 127 years at 2025 rates of apparent consumption. This period of provision will inevitably shorten with projected increasing consumption rates, emphasizing that further research could be completed to better delineate regions of high lithium resource potential and support exploration and domestic production.

Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New H↗

Guide and data requirements for submission of mineral deposit mineral chemistry data in the Critical Minerals in Ores - Mineral Chemistry (CMiO-MIN) database

The Critical Minerals in Ores - Mineral Chemistry (CMiO-MIN) database (Hawkins et al., 2026) is designed to capture ore and ore-related mineral compositional data from critical mineral-bearing deposits across the globe. Samples included within this database must be well-characterised and come from localities that have been sufficiently studied to have a reasonable constraint on their deposit type and environment of formation. As such, only samples analysed by modern geochemical methods, and with certain minimum metadata attribution, can be accepted. Data that is submitted to the CMiO-MIN database will also be published via the Geoscience Australia Portal (portal.ga.gov.au) and Critical Minerals Mapping Initiative Portal (www.criticalminerals.org). The CMiO-MIN database is a companion database for the Critical Minerals in Ores (CMiO) database (Champion et al., 2021) that was first published in 2021. This guide draws heavily from the submission guide for CMiO (Case et al., 2024) to ensure similar processes for each database. For more information about the CMiO database please refer Champion et al. (2021) and Case et al. (2024; 2025).

Report↗

Assessing United States gallium and germanium resources in basin-hosted deposits – The good and bad

Basin-hosted Zn-Pb deposits, including MVT and clastic-dominated (CD or “Sedex”) Zn-Pb deposits are major sources of Zn and Pb, as well as other critical elements. We examined available whole rock and sphalerite chemistry data to understand the apparent variation of Ga and Ge among major current and historical districts of the United States (US). Robust data from the Central Tennessee district demonstrate Ga and Ge enrichment. Limited historical data suggesting anomalous concentrations in the nearby Central Kentucky and Illinois-Kentucky districts imply a possible similar fluid chemistry for Ga and Ge transport. The deposits of the Red Dog district, Alaska, also have anomalous concentrations of Ge, but not Ga. Our work demonstrates the utility of whole rock geochemistry to identify potential critical element resources. Highly qualitative estimates, based on geochemical data, indicate that these basin-hosted deposits contain Ge (and in the case of Central Tennessee, Ge and Ga) resources of potentially sufficient size to provide decades of resources if appropriate domestic processing is developed.

Conference Paper↗

Low-sulfidation epithermal deposits of the central Basin and Range Province, USA

The Basin and Range Province is host to many important low-sulfidation epithermal deposits. Within this broad zone of extension, epithermal deposits are hosted by specific areas of Miocene and younger bimodal volcanism. In northern Nevada, rifting and related volcanic activity occurred in response to thermal bulging during the development of the Yellowstone hotspot. The Colorado River Extensional Corridor in southern Nevada, adjoining eastern California and northwestern Arizona, is a major zone of Miocene crustal extension formed during the transformation of the western margin of North America from a convergent to a transform plate boundary. The style of mineralization in the low-sulfidation epithermal deposits in these areas is strongly controlled by the nature of the volcanic successions. Highgrade, low-tonnage deposits are commonly found in flow-dominated volcanic successions where ore deposition occurred through short-lived periods of fluid flashing. In contrast, low-grade, large-tonnage deposits are more commonly located in clastic-dominated successions where fluid infiltration of the permeable hosts and cooling predominated.

Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon↗