Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Emily C. Berquist

Publications and source records attributed to Emily C. Berquist.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Stability of inorganic and methylated arsenic species in laboratory standards, surface water and groundwater under three different preservation regimes

Geogenic arsenic (As) adversely affects drinking water quality in geologically diverse aquifers across the globe. Although the species of As significantly affects its fate, transport, toxicity, and As treatment technology efficacy, reported effectiveness of As species preservation methods varies widely with preservation methods and natural water geochemistry. Our study 1) evaluates the shelf life of As(III), As(V), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and monomethylarsonate (MMA) in standards prepared with ultrapure water; 2) establishes a hold time for these As species in low-iron (Fe) groundwater and surface water samples preserved with a concentration of EDTA that exceeded the sum of the molar concentrations of Al, Fe, Mn, Ca, Mg, and Sr (molar excess of EDTA); and 3) evaluates As(III) species stability in groundwater samples with detectable SO 4 and up to 6.5 mg/L Fe concentrations preserved in 3 ways: less than molar excess EDTA, molar excess EDTA, and Vacuette® tubes with an unknown (proprietary) amount of EDTA. Arsenic species standards prepared with 2.5 mM EDTA in ultrapure water and stored at 4 °C had a shelf life of at least 180 days. As(III) was stable for at least 15 days and DMA and MMA were stable for at least 90 days in environmental samples with Fe less than 1 mg/L that were preserved with a molar excess of EDTA and stored in opaque containers at 4 °C. As(III) species were not stable for any holding time in samples with Fe greater than 1 mg/L and detectable SO 4 when preserved with a molar excess of EDTA and stored in white high density polyethylene bottles at room temperature, or when preserved by storage in EDTA containing Vacuette® tubes at 4 °C. For geochemical or water quality studies where the distribution of As(III) and As(V) is a critical factor, an understanding of the sample chemistry, rapid As speciation analysis after sample collection, and collecting a field spike with the sample can be helpful for collecting accurate inorganic As species data.

Applied Geochemistry

Arsenic concentrations after drinking water well installation: Time-varying effects on arsenic mobilization

Chronic exposure to geogenic arsenic via drinking water is a worldwide health concern. However, effects of well installation and operation on arsenic concentrations and mobilization are not well understood. This knowledge gap impacts both reliable detection of arsenic in drinking water and effective public health recommendations to reduce exposure to arsenic. This study examines changes in arsenic and redox geochemistry over one year following installation of 254 new domestic water wells in three regions of the north-central USA that commonly have elevated arsenic concentrations. Our regions' geologic settings share some important characteristics with other high-arsenic aquifers: igneous bedrock aquifers; or late Pleistocene-age glacial sand and gravel aquifers interbedded with aquitards. Over the study, arsenic concentrations increased by 16% or more in 25% of wells in glacial aquifer regions, and the redox conditions changed towards more reducing. In wells in the bedrock region, there was no significant change in arsenic concentrations, and redox conditions changed towards more oxidizing. Our findings illustrate the importance of understanding short- to moderate-term impacts of well installation and operation on arsenic and aqueous chemistry, as it relates to human exposure. Our study informs water quality sampling requirements, which currently do not consider the implications sampling timing with respect to well installation. Evaluating arsenic concentrations in samples from new wells in the context of general regional pH and redox conditions can provide information regarding the degree of disequilibrium created by well drilling. Our analysis approach may be transferable and scalable to similar aquifer settings across the globe.

Minnesota

How or when samples are collected affects measured arsenic concentration in new drinking water wells

Naturally occurring arsenic can adversely affect water quality in geologically diverse aquifers throughout the world. Chronic exposure to arsenic via drinking water is a human health concern due to risks for certain cancers, skin abnormalities, peripheral neuropathy, and other negative health effects. Statewide in Minnesota, USA, 11% of samples from new drinking water wells have arsenic concentrations exceeding 10 μg/L; in certain counties more than 35% of tested samples exceed 10 μg/L arsenic. Since 2008, Minnesota well code has required testing water from new wells for arsenic. Sample collection protocols are not specified in the well code, so among 180 well drillers there is variability in sampling methods, including sample collection point and sample collection timing. This study examines the effect of arsenic sample collection protocols on the variability of measured arsenic concentrations in water from new domestic water supply wells. Study wells were drilled between 2014 and 2016 in three regions of Minnesota that commonly have elevated arsenic concentrations in groundwater. Variability in measured arsenic concentration at a well was reduced when samples were (1) filtered, (2) collected from household plumbing instead of from the drill rig pump, or (3) collected several months after well construction (instead of within 4 weeks of well installation). Particulates and fine aquifer sediments entrained in groundwater samples, or other artifacts of drilling disturbance, can cause undesirable variability in measurements. Establishing regulatory protocols requiring sample filtration and/or collection from household plumbing could improve the reliability of information provided to well owners and to secondary data users.

Groundwater