Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Desiree M. Moore

Publications and source records attributed to Desiree M. Moore.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow

The decline of pelagophil minnows is related to river fragmentation across the southern Great Plains landscape. Because we know little about pelagophil movement patterns and timing, we aimed to quantify the movements of the vulnerable Arkansas River shiner (ARS) during the winter (November–March) and prespawning (April–June) seasons. We tagged 4233 ARS using visible implant elastomer, passive integrated transponder, or p-Chip micro-transponder tags in 2018–2020. We sampled to recapture tagged fish weekly during the winter and biweekly during the spring. Tagged fish exhibited a downstream movement bias and movement was weakly related to increasing temperature, discharge, and photoperiod during winter, however most of the variability was explained by a random individual effect. Larger individuals moved greater distances than smaller fish. Upstream movements by a migratory portion of the population appeared to begin around late February based on the presence of fish at previously unoccupied sites. However, the first long-distance (30-km) upstream movement by a tagged fish was documented in late May. We show evidence that some ARS may be resident fish at sites throughout winter and spring of multiple years. To conserve freshwater pelagophil minnows, our results indicate water management strategies improving river connectivity in late winter through the spawning season may benefit spawning by migratory individuals, whereas lateral connectivity might benefit the resident portion of the population. Research efforts under experimental flows could provide insight to improved recovery options.

Oklahoma

Evaluation of visual implant elastomer, PIT, and p-Chip tagging methods in a small-bodied minnow species

Reliable fish tagging methods are needed to conduct studies (e.g., movement, habitat, abundance) that inform conservation and management decisions; however, dependable tagging approaches are lacking for many small-bodied fishes. Therefore, our study objective was to determine survival, tag retention (visible implant elastomer [VIE], PIT, or light-activated microtransponder [“p-Chip”]) and tagging effects on short-term growth of the federally threatened Arkansas River Shiner Notropis girardi . We also examined the use of anesthesia to reduce fish mortality (i.e., reduce handling time) and improve tagging efficiency. Fish tagged with p-Chips had the highest survival (87%), whereas VIE-tagged fish had the second highest survival (67%). Visible implant elastomer tags were retained in our fish 88% of the time, and retention was also high using p-Chips (72%). Location of the VIE tag did not significantly affect survival or retention rates. Survival of PIT-tagged fish significantly increased from 53% to 83% when handling time was reduced; however, tag retention was relatively low in both cases (50% and 45%, respectively). The majority of tagged fish across experiments (83–100%) gained weight regardless of tag type. If the research or management goal is to tag Arkansas River Shiner or similar species with individual identification, p-Chips appear to be an appropriate tag. Particularly if cost is limiting or higher tag retention is needed, VIE tags would also be appropriate for batch tagging (i.e., no individual identification). Additional studies to broaden application of tagging to other small-bodied species would be beneficial

Okhahoma