C.S. Calleson | Search USGS

USGS2025

Using community-reported data to understand how boat speed affects marine wildlife: An example with the Florida manatee

Boat collisions are a known and increasing threat to many marine wildlife populations. The Florida manatee Trichechus manatus latirostris is a key example of a species with high boat-related mortality, whose long-term viability and population are limited by human activities in shared habitats. The goal of this work was to quantify the probability of lethal injury to Florida manatees using community-reported data on collisions with boats. We test the hypothesis that higher boat speeds increase the probability of lethal injury to manatees. Empirical data to test this hypothesis are collected opportunistically, with low sample sizes and uncertainty in reported boat speed. We fit a logistic regression model using Bayesian inference with Markov Chain Monte Carlo to community-reported collision data. We also present results for two errors-in-variables modelling approaches that account for uncertainty in boat speeds reported as qualitative values. The first uses a multiple imputation approach, whereas the second uses Bayesian estimation with informed priors. We evaluated issues related to quasi-separation, sample size, and measurement errors using simulated data. The models predicted that the probability of lethal injury increased at greater strike speed. However, the small number of records with low boat speed or where the injury was considered non-lethal contributed to uncertainty around this functional relationship. Although the relationships were consistent among models, the uncertainty was greater for the errors-in-variables models. Practical implication . When combined with information on manatee and boat abundance and behaviour, the results of this analysis can be used to predict the number of deadly collisions, test alternative management scenarios and inform speed zone regulations. We also identify ways to improve data reporting to reduce uncertainty in the effect of boat speed on lethal injury to marine wildlife. This type of analysis can be applied to any marine animal where records of collisions with boats are kept.

Florida↗

USGS2018

Integrating encounter theory with decision analysis to evaluate collision risk and determine optimal protection zones for wildlife

1.Better understanding human‐wildlife interactions and their links with management can help improve the design of wildlife protection zones. One example is the problem of wildlife collisions with vehicles or human‐built structures (e.g. power lines, wind farms). In fact, collisions between marine wildlife and watercraft are among the major threats faced by several endangered species of marine mammals. Natural resource managers are therefore interested in finding cost‐effective solutions to mitigate these threats. 2.We combined abundance estimators with encounter rate theory to estimate relative lethal collision risk of the Florida manatee ( Trichechus manatus latirostris ) from watercraft. We first modeled seasonal abundance of watercraft and manatees using a Bayesian analysis of aerial survey count data. We then modeled relative lethal collision risk in space and across seasons. Finally, we applied decision analysis and Linear Integer Programming to determine the optimal design of speed zones in terms of relative risk to manatees and costs to waterway users. We used a Pareto efficient frontier approach to evaluate the performance of alternative zones, which included additional practical considerations (e.g. spatial aggregation of speed zones) in relation to the optimal zone configurations. 3.Under the various relationships for probability of death given strike speed that we considered, the current speed zones reduced the relative lethal collision risk by an average of 51.5% to 70% compared to the scenario in which all speed regulations were removed (i.e. the no‐protection scenario). We identified optimal zones and near‐optimal zones with additional management considerations that improved upon the current zones in terms of cost or relative risk. 4.Policy Implications : Our analytical framework combines encounter rate theory and decision analysis to quantify the effectiveness of speed zones protecting manatees while accounting for uncertainty. Our approach can be used to optimize the design of protection zones intended to reduce conflicts between human waterborne activity and marine mammals. This framework could be extended to address many other problems of human‐wildlife interactions, such as the optimal placement of wind farms to minimize collisions with wildlife or the optimal allocation of ranger effort to mitigate poaching threats.

Journal of Applied Ecology↗