Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Andrew Miller

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew Miller.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2025

The nonpoint source challenge: Obstacles and opportunities for meeting nutrient reduction goals in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

This document examines the Chesapeake Bay watershed response to nutrient and sediment reduction efforts under the Clean Water Act's total maximum daily load (TMDL) regulation. As the 2025 Chesapeake Bay TMDL deadline approaches, water quality goals remain unmet, primarily because of nonpoint source pollution, the largest remaining source of nutrients and sediment, and the primary obstacle to meeting the TMDL. We focus on the factors influencing the gap between the expected effect of management to reduce nonpoint source loads reaching the Bay and empirical evidence suggesting that decades of effort have not produced the expected improvement. This gap may be caused by both insufficient scale and type of implemented water quality management practices and by an overestimation of practice effectiveness. Reasons water quality goals remain unmet include legacy nutrients and lag times masking or delaying the effects of management efforts, areas with large nutrient mass imbalances contributing disproportionate loads, and the difficulty of incentivizing behavior change in voluntary nonpoint source programs. Closing the response gap may require fundamental changes to nonpoint source programs. Apart from seeking additional funding, nonpoint source programs could develop policies to more effectively incentivize behavior change, identify and target treatment of high loading areas with appropriate management actions, and address nutrient mass imbalances.

Chesapeake Bay watershed↗
USGS2024

Impounded sediment and dam removal: Erosion rates and proximal downstream fate

Sediment management is an important aspect of dam removal projects, often driving costs and influencing community acceptance. For dams storing uncontaminated sediments, downstream release is often the cheapest and most practical approach and can be ecologically beneficial to downstream areas deprived of sediment for years. To employ this option, project proponents must estimate the sediment quantity to be released and, if substantial, estimate how long it will take to erode, where it will go and how long it will stay there. We investigated these issues when the Bloede Dam was removed from the Patapsco River in Maryland, USA, in 2018. The dam was about 10 m high, and its impoundment was nearly filled with an estimated 186 600 m 3 of sediment composed of 70% sand and 30% mud. After removal, using elevation surveys generated by traditional methods as well as structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry at high temporal resolution, we documented rapid erosion of stored sediments in the first 6 months (~60%) followed by greatly reduced erosion rates for the next two and a half years. A stable channel developed in the impoundment during the rapid erosion phase. These results were predicted by a two-phased erosion response model developed from observations at sand-filled impoundments, thus expanding its applicability to include impoundments with a sand-over-mud stratigraphy. A similar two-phase erosion response has been reported for sediment releases at other dam removals in the United States, France and Japan across a range of dam and watershed scales, indicating what practitioners and communities should expect in similar settings. Downstream, repeat surveys combined with discharge and sediment gaging showed rapid transport of eroded sediments through a 5-km reach, especially during the first year when discharges were above normal, and little overbank storage.

Maryland↗
USGS2023

The dynamic influence of subsurface geological processes on the assembly and diversification of thermophilic microbial communities in continental hydrothermal systems

An accepted paradigm of hydrothermal systems is the process of phase separation, or boiling, of a deep, homogeneous hydrothermal fluid as it ascends through the subsurface resulting in gas rich and gas poor fluids. While phase separation helps to explain first-order patterns in the chemistry and biology of a hot spring’s surficial expression, we know little about the subsurface architecture beneath “phase-separated” pools and the timescales over which phase separation processes occur. Essentially, we have a two-dimensional understanding of a four-dimensional process. By combining geophysical, geochemical, isotopic, and microbiological measurements of two adjacent phase-separated hot springs in Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, we provide a four-dimensional assessment of phase separation processes and their biological manifestation. We uniquely show that Yellowstone’s hydrothermal waters originate from a deep sedimentary aquifer and that both meteoric recharge and shallow reactive transport processes are required to establish the geobiological feedbacks that drive bimodal distributions in the geochemical and microbial composition of hot springs. Specifically, over periods of tens of years, gas-enriched fluids containing volcanic sulfide mix with meteoric waters resulting in microbially-mediated production of sulfuric acid by thermoacidophilic Archaea in the near subsurface. In contrast, over periods of hundreds of years, anoxic residual liquid rises to the surface where it is infused with atmospheric gas fostering Archaea and Bacteria that are largely dependent on oxygen. As such, our results provide formative insight into the causative links between subsurface geological processes, the development of geochemical fluids, and the assembly and diversification of thermophilic microbial communities in hydrothermal systems.

Wyoming↗
USGS2022

Assessing the spawning movement and habitat needs of riverine Neosho Smallmouth Bass

Stream fishes are vulnerable to a variety of natural and anthropogenic stressors. Information on fish movements and habitat use is essential to conserve and manage populations, particularly at the edges of distributions and novel habitats. The Neosho Smallmouth Bass Micropterus dolomieu velox is endemic to the southwestern Ozark Highlands ecoregion, where the riverscape is highly dissected by impoundments. Our study objectives were to determine the pre-spawn, spawn, and post-spawn movements of adult, radio-tagged Neosho Smallmouth Bass, and identify the habitat factors at multiple spatial scales related to suitable spawning habitat. Movements by tagged fish in the Elk River of Oklahoma and Missouri and two Oklahoma tributaries draining to lower Elk River and Grand Lake O’ the Cherokee were greatest during the spring spawning period and were positively related to discharge and fish size; however, we observed considerable individual and stream-specific variability. Temperature and fish movement rate in the Elk River were positively related in all seasons except for winter, although temperature was less important for Smallmouth Bass movement in the smaller streams. Tagged fish were never detected using active or passive telemetry in the reservoir or reservoir-river interface except during periods of lotic character (i.e., the reservoir was not pooled above the Buffalo Creek-Elk River confluence). Nests were typically located at intermediate depths (mean = 0.8 m; SD = 0.3) and in low velocity habitats (0.0–0.2 m/s). Most of the nests examined comprised gravel substrates; however, 2.5% of the nests observed were located on full or partial bedrock substrate. We also documented nest clustering behavior by Neosho Smallmouth Bass (i.e., adjacent nests within 2 m of each other); 66 nest clusters were identified across 22 stream reaches. Cluster presence was more prevalent in warmer stream reaches with wide, shallow channels, and less likely in groundwater-gaining reaches, whereas overall nest abundance was greater in warmer streams and reaches with deeper pools. We showed the importance of both warmer streams and deep pools of small streams for Smallmouth Bass rearing (i.e., young-of-year abundance). We found negative relationships between floods and first-year juvenile survival and show the importance of stream network position (i.e., adjacency to larger streams) for mitigating the negative effects of July floods. Our analyses of both nesting and young-of-year habitat use suggest small streams, typically not considered important to many fisheries, are responsible for a proportion of Neosho Smallmouth Bass production. Further, consideration of management actions restricting take during the early spawning season may be warranted due to the unique nesting behavior (i.e., clustering) exhibited by this subspecies.

Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma↗
USGS2021

The Chesapeake Bay program modeling system: Overview and recommendations for future development

The Chesapeake Bay is the largest, most productive, and most biologically diverse estuary in the continental United States providing crucial habitat and natural resources for culturally and economically important species. Pressures from human population growth and associated development and agricultural intensification have led to excessive nutrient and sediment inputs entering the Bay, negatively affecting the health of the Bay ecosystem and the economic services it provides. The Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) is a unique program formally created in 1983 as a multi-stakeholder partnership to guide and foster restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. Since its inception, the CBP Partnership has been developing, updating, and applying a complex linked modeling system of watershed, airshed, and estuary models as a planning tool to inform strategic management decisions and Bay restoration efforts. This paper provides a description of the 2017 CBP Modeling System and the higher trophic level models developed by the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, along with specific recommendations that emerged from a 2018 workshop designed to inform future model development. Recommendations highlight the need for simulation of watershed inputs, conditions, processes, and practices at higher resolution to provide improved information to guide local nutrient and sediment management plans. More explicit and extensive modeling of connectivity between watershed landforms and estuary sub-areas, estuarine hydrodynamics, watershed and estuarine water quality, the estuarine-watershed socioecological system, and living resources will be important to broaden and improve characterization of responses to targeted nutrient and sediment load reductions. Finally, the value and importance of maintaining effective collaborations among jurisdictional managers, scientists, modelers, support staff, and stakeholder communities is emphasized. An open collaborative and transparent process has been a key element of successes to date and is vitally important as the CBP Partnership moves forward with modeling system improvements that help stakeholders evolve new knowledge, improve management strategies, and better communicate outcomes.

Chesapeake Bay estuary and watershed↗
USGS2020

Pavement alters delivery of sediment and fallout radionuclides to urbanstreams

Sediment from urban impervious surfaces has the potential to be an important vector for contaminants, particularly where stormwater culverts and other buried channels draining large impervious areas exit from underground pipes into open channels. To better understand urban sediment sources and their relation to fallout radionuclides, we collected samples of rainfall, urban sediment (pavement sediment, topsoil), streambank sediment, and fluvial sediment (suspended sediment and bed sediment) for 7 Be, 210 Pb ex , and 137 Cs analysis. The results indicate that each rainfall event tags pavement sediment with elevated activities of 7 Be and 210 Pb ex such that runoff from impervious surfaces in the buried channel part of the stream network contains the highest activities. Pavement sediment, because it is characteristically a thin veneer, has a small mass to rainwater ratio resulting in a greater tagging of 7 Be and 210 Pb ex activity than does topsoil on a per gram basis. An unmixing model indicated that suspended-sediment samples collected at the culvert outlet from the buried-channel network are from pavement sediment sources (45 ± 25%) with a smaller component of topsoil (22 ± 19%), and a component from streambanks (32 ± 35%) that we infer to be older channel material and subsoil eroded from within the culvert system. Downstream from the culvert, suspended sediment collected from the open-channel parts of the stream had 7 Be and 210 Pb ex activities that were substantially reduced by the contribution of sediment from streambanks (57 ± 15%), with pavement contributions decreasing to 15 (±9%) and topsoil contributing 28 (±7%). The results highlight the utility of 7 Be, 210 Pb ex , and 137 Cs as tracers of urban sediment sources, resulting in a unique radionuclide signature for urban watersheds compared to other sediment-source settings.

Maryland↗
USGS2017

Deepwater Program: Lophelia II, continuing ecological research on deep-sea corals and deep-reef habitats in the Gulf of Mexico

The deep sea is a rich environment composed of diverse habitat types. While deep-sea coral habitats have been discovered within each ocean basin, knowledge about the ecology of these habitats and associated inhabitants continues to grow. This report presents information and results from the Lophelia II project that examined deep-sea coral habitats in the Gulf of Mexico. The Lophelia II project focused on Lophelia pertusa habitats along the continental slope, at depths ranging from 300 to 1,000 meters. The chapters are authored by several scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of North Carolina Wilmington, and Florida State University who examined the community ecology (from microbes to fishes), deep-sea coral age, growth, and reproduction, and population connectivity of deep-sea corals and inhabitants. Data from these studies are presented in the chapters and appendixes of the report as well as in journal publications. This study was conducted by the Ecosystems Mission Area of the U.S. Geological Survey to meet information needs identified by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

Gulf of Mexico↗
USGS2017

Channel response to sediment release: insights from a paired analysis of dam removal

Dam removals with unmanaged sediment releases are good opportunities to learn about channel response to abruptly increased bed material supply. Understanding these events is important because they affect aquatic habitats and human uses of floodplains. A longstanding paradigm in geomorphology holds that response rates to landscape disturbance exponentially decay through time. However, a previous study of the Merrimack Village Dam (MVD) removal on the Souhegan River in New Hampshire, USA, showed that an exponential function poorly described the early geomorphic response. Erosion of impounded sediments there was two-phased. We had an opportunity to quantitatively test the two-phase response model proposed for MVD by extending the record there and comparing it with data from the Simkins Dam removal on the Patapsco River in Maryland, USA. The watershed sizes are the same order of magnitude (10 2 km 2 ), and at both sites low-head dams were removed (~3–4 m) and ~65 000 m 3 of sand-sized sediments were discharged to low-gradient reaches. Analyzing four years of repeat morphometry and sediment surveys at the Simkins site, as well as continuous discharge and turbidity data, we observed the two-phase erosion response described for MVD. In the early phase, approximately 50% of the impounded sediment at Simkins was eroded rapidly during modest flows. After incision to base level and widening, a second phase began when further erosion depended on floods large enough to go over bank and access impounded sediments more distant from the newly-formed channel. Fitting functional forms to the data for both sites, we found that two-phase exponential models with changing decay constants fit the erosion data better than single-phase models. Valley width influences the two-phase erosion responses upstream, but downstream responses appear more closely related to local gradient, sediment re-supply from the upstream impoundments, and base flows.

Maryland↗
USGS2015

Sediment contributions from floodplains and legacy sediments to Piedmont streams of Baltimore County, Maryland

Disparity between watershed erosion rates and downstream sediment delivery has remained an important theme in geomorphology for many decades, with the role of floodplains in sediment storage as a common focus. In the Piedmont Province of the eastern USA, upland deforestation and agricultural land use following European settlement led to accumulation of thick packages of overbank sediment in valley bottoms, commonly referred to as legacy deposits. Previous authors have argued that legacy deposits represent a potentially important source of modern sediment loads following remobilization by lateral migration and progressive channel widening. This paper seeks to quantify (1) rates of sediment remobilization from Baltimore County floodplains by channel migration and bank erosion, (2) proportions of streambank sediment derived from legacy deposits, and (3) potential contribution of net streambank erosion and legacy sediments to downstream sediment yield within the Mid-Atlantic Piedmont. We calculated measurable gross erosion and deposition rates within the fluvial corridor along 40 valley segments from 18 watersheds with drainage areas between 0.18 and 155 km 2 in Baltimore County, Maryland. We compared stream channel and floodplain morphology from lidar-based digital elevation data collected in 2005 with channel positions recorded on 1:2400 scale topographic maps from 1959–1961 in order to quantify 44–46 years of channel change. Sediment bulk density and particle size distributions were characterized from streambank and channel deposit samples and used for volume to mass conversions and for comparison with other sediment sources. Average annual lateral migration rates ranged from 0.04 to 0.19 m/y, which represented an annual migration of 2.5% (0.9–4.4%) channel width across all study segments, suggesting that channel dimensions may be used as reasonable predictors of bank erosion rates. Gross bank erosion rates varied from 43 to 310 Mg/km/y (median = 114) and were positively correlated with drainage area. Measured deposition within channels accounted for an average of 46% (28–75%) of gross erosion, with deposition increasingly important in larger drainages. Legacy sediments accounted for 6–90% of bank erosion at individual study segments, represented about 60% of bank height at most exposures, and accounted for 57% (± 16%) of the measured gross erosion. Extrapolated results indicated that first- and second-order streams accounted for 62% (± 38%) of total streambank erosion from 1005 km 2 of northern Baltimore County. After accounting for estimated redeposition, extrapolated net streambank sediment yields (72 Mg/km 2 /y) constituted 70% of estimated average Piedmont watershed yields (104 Mg/km 2 /y). The results suggest that streambank sediments are a relatively large source of sediment from Piedmont tributaries to the Chesapeake Bay.

Maryland↗