Search USGS⌕ Search

Geology topics

Andrew J. Sánchez Meador

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew J. Sánchez Meador.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Canopy and surface fuels measurement using terrestrial lidar single-scan approach in the Mogollon highlands of Arizona

Background Fuel monitoring data are essential to evaluate wildfire risk, plan management activities and evaluate fuel treatment effects. Terrestrial light detection and ranging (lidar) is a field-based 3D scanning technology with great potential to reduce labor-intensive field measurements and provide new depths of vegetation structure data. Aims To facilitate the integration of terrestrial lidar into fuel monitoring programs, we developed a model, training process, and Python program that produces canopy fuel, surface fuel and terrain metrics commonly used in fire behavior and fire risk modeling. Methods We estimated canopy and surface fuel metrics from terrestrial lidar using a semi-empirical model incorporating physically based modeling of leaf area density and occlusion and a non-destructive model calibration process leveraging Bayesian regression. We compared lidar-derived fuel estimates with conventional fuel estimates across diverse conditions in semi-arid shrubland, woodland and forest in Arizona. We also compared estimates using single- and multiple-scan modes. Key results In single-scan mode, our lidar-derived fuel estimates were significantly related to conventional estimates of total canopy fuel load, maximum canopy bulk density, downed surface fuel load and standing surface fuel load. Implications Our methods provide opportunities to increase the scalability of fuel monitoring to better understand wildfire risk and treatment effectiveness.

Arizona↗

Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests

Implementation of wildfire- and climate-adaptation strategies in seasonally dry forests of western North America is impeded by numerous constraints and uncertainties. After more than a century of resource and land use change, some question the need for proactive management, particularly given novel social, ecological, and climatic conditions. To address this question, we first provide a framework for assessing changes in landscape conditions and fire regimes. Using this framework, we then evaluate evidence of change and lack of change in contemporary conditions following more than a century of fire exclusion. The cumulative results of more than a century of research document a persistent and substantial fire deficit and widespread alterations to the ecological structures and functions maintained by active fire regimes, i.e., those uninterrupted by a century or more of fire exclusion. These changes are not necessarily apparent at all spatial scales or in all dimensions of fire regimes and forest and nonforest conditions. Nonetheless, loss of the once abundant influence of low- and moderate-severity fires suggests that while some ecosystems within these landscapes may not be directly altered by fire exclusion, even the least fire-prone among them may be affected by alteration of the surrounding landscape and, consequently, ecosystem functions. Vegetation spatial patterns in fire-excluded forested landscapes no longer reflect the heterogeneity maintained by interacting fires of active fire regimes. Live and dead vegetation (surface and canopy fuels) is generally more abundant and continuous than before European colonization. As a result, current conditions are more vulnerable to the direct and indirect effects of seasonal and episodic increases in fire and drought, especially under a rapidly warming climate. Long-term fire exclusion and contemporaneous social-ecological influences continue to extensively modify seasonally dry forested landscapes. Management that realigns or adapts fire-excluded conditions to seasonal and episodic increases in fire and drought can moderate ecosystem transitions as forests and human communities adapt to changing climatic and disturbance regimes. As adaptation strategies are developed, evaluated, and implemented, objective scientific evaluation of ongoing research and monitoring can aid differentiation between warranted and unwarranted uncertainties.

Ecological Applications↗

Management strategy influences landscape patterns of high-severity burn patches in the southwestern United States

Context: Spatial patterns of high-severity wildfire in forests affect vegetation recovery pathways, watershed dynamics, and wildlife habitat across landscapes. Yet, less is known about contemporary trends in landscape patterns of high-severity fire or how differing federal fire management strategies have influenced such patterns. Objectives: We assessed fires managed for ecological/resource benefit and fires that are fully suppressed and investigated: (1) whether spatial patterns of high-severity fire differed by management strategy, (2) whether spatial patterns were related to fire size and proportion of high-severity fire, and (3) temporal trends in spatial patterns. Methods: We examined high-severity spatial patterns within large fires using satellite-derived burn severity data from 709 fires that burned from 1984-2017 in Arizona and New Mexico, USA. We calculated a suite of spatial pattern metrics for each individual fire and developed a method to identify those which best explained variation among fires. Results: Compared to managed fires, spatial pattern metrics in suppression fires showed greater patch homogeneity. All spatial pattern metrics showed significant relationships with fire size and proportion of high-severity fire for both management strategies. Mean annual spatiotemporal trends in suppression fires have moved toward smaller, more complex, fragmented patches since the early 2000s. Conclusions: Increases in fire size and proportion high-severity fire are driving more homogenous patches regardless of management type, with proportion high-severity more strongly driving average temporal trends. Anticipated shifts in fire size and severity will likely result in larger, more contiguous, and simple-shaped patches of high-severity fire within southwestern conifer forests.

Arizona, New Mexico↗