Alexis Sakas | Search USGS

USGS2024

Larval Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) zooplankton consumption remains constant despite variation in prey densities in western Lake Erie

Larval fish growth and survival could be limited or reduced due to patchiness of zooplankton densities, even in productive aquatic systems. Recent declines in Lake Whitefish ( Coregonus clupeaformis ) populations prompted research to identify underlying mechanisms controlling survival at early life stages. In Lake Erie, the bottleneck window controlling year-class strength of Lake Whitefish likely occurs during the first growing season, suggesting that availability of important prey could influence year-class strength. Therefore, spatial and temporal larval Lake Whitefish distribution, diet, and prey utilization were evaluated in western Lake Erie. The pelagic Lake Whitefish larval period in the western basin extends from April 1 to May 15 with most larvae concentrated nearshore at the surface both day and night. Cyclopoid copepods were the most important prey item; however, calanoid copepods and Cladocera were consistently consumed, indicating that copepods and Cladocera were important larval Lake Whitefish prey items. Copepod and Cladocera biomass were the highest nearshore, overlapping with the highest larval Lake Whitefish densities. However, the amount of food consumed by larvae was consistent in all areas, suggesting that offshore areas in western Lake Erie with relatively low zooplankton biomass harbor enough food to satiate larval Lake Whitefish. Therefore, it is unlikely that prey availability limits survival through means of starvation during the larval phase.

western Lake Erie↗

USGS2022

Bright spots for inland fish and fisheries to guide future hydropower development

Hydropower production is one of the greatest threats to fluvial ecosystems and freshwater biodiversity. Now that we have entered the Anthropocene , there is an opportunity to reflect on what might constitute a ‘sustainable’ Anthropocene in the context of hydropower and riverine fish populations. Considering elements of existing practices that promote favorable social-ecological outcomes (i.e., ‘bright spots’) is timely given that there are plans to expand hydropower capacity in previously undammed rivers, intensify dam development in some of the world's largest river systems, and re-license existing facilities. We approach this from a pragmatic perspective: for the foreseeable future, hydropower will likely remain an important source of renewable electricity. To offer support for moving toward a more ‘sustainable’ Anthropocene, we provide syntheses of best practices during the siting, design, construction, operation, and compensation phases of hydropower development to minimize impacts on inland fish. For each phase, we offer positive examples (or what might be considered ‘bright spots’) pertaining to some of the approaches described within our syntheses, acknowledging that these projects may not be viewed as without ecological and (or) societal detriment by all stakeholders. Our findings underscore the importance of protecting critical habitat and free-flowing river reaches through careful site selection and basin-scale planning, infrastructure designs that minimize reservoir effects and facilitate safe passage of fish, construction of hydropower plants using best practices that minimize long-term damage, operating guidelines that mimic natural flow conditions, and compensation that is lasting, effective, inclusive, and locally relevant. Learning from these ‘bright spots’ may require engagement of diverse stakeholders, professionals, and governments at scales that extend well beyond a given site, river, or even basin. Indeed, environmental planning that integrates hydropower development into broader discussions of conserving regional biodiversity and ecosystem services will be of utmost importance.

Water Biology and Security↗