Search USGSSearch

Geology topics

Alaina D. Thomas

Publications and source records attributed to Alaina D. Thomas.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Listening for extinction: Range-wide occupancy highlights critical risks and priorities for northern spotted owls

The northern spotted owl ( Strix occidentalis caurina ) continues to decline across its range, threatened by habitat disturbances and invasive barred owls ( Strix varia ). We conducted a range-wide spotted owl occupancy assessment using 2.1 million h of passive acoustic recordings from 4081 survey stations within 1027 randomly selected 5-km 2 hexagons across six physiographic regions. Applying multistate occupancy models, we estimated probabilities of landscape use (by at least one northern spotted owl) and pair occupancy (occupied by both a male and a female), while accounting for imperfect and sex-biased detection probability. Detection probability of pairs was low in most regions, primarily due to undetected females, but increased with survey effort. If management decisions can only be made when there is a high probability of detecting both sexes when they are present, then longer surveys are one approach to support the decisions. Landscape use and pair occupancy were positively associated with old-growth forest structure and topographic diversity. We also found a pronounced latitudinal gradient in spotted owl landscape use rates with estimated mean landscape use of 0.17 (SE = 0.03) and 0.16 (SE = 0.02) in the two most northern regions, and 0.54 (SE = 0.04) and 0.52 (SE = 0.05) in the two most southern regions. Pair occupancy rates were higher in southern regions (0.29, SE = 0.03, 0.43, SE = 0.05) and very low in northern regions (0.04, SE = 0.01, 0.03, SE = 0.01). In contrast to spotted owls, barred owls were detected in 90% of northern hexagons and 50% of southern hexagons, and barred owl calling intensity was over eight times higher than spotted owls. These results highlight extinction risks in several regions and suggest that management actions, such as spatially targeted barred owl control and protection of structurally complex habitats, have a narrow temporal window in which they can be effective in lowering the probability of regional extirpations. We generated predictive maps of landscape use and pair occupancy, which could help guide regional conservation strategies. This study demonstrates how passive acoustic monitoring and machine learning can be used for broad-scale ecological monitoring, identifying extinction risk thresholds, supporting adaptive management, and improving conservation outcomes for wide-ranging and elusive species that can reliably be detected through unique vocalizations.

California, Oregon, Washington

Passive acoustic monitoring is a cost-effective approach to conduct inland surveys for marbled murrelets

The marbled murrelet ( Brachyramphus marmoratus ) is a seabird of conservation concern that nests in late-successional, old-growth forests in Oregon, Washington, and California, USA. Traditional audio-visual surveys have been the standard method for detecting murrelets in forests. Given that murrelets can be extremely cryptic in forest environments, audio-visual surveys are difficult, time consuming, and expensive to conduct. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) may be a useful and cost-effective alternative. Using a paired murrelet survey design, we compared detection probabilities across 88 survey points in forests of Oregon and Washington. We conducted 2–4 early morning audio-visual surveys and 13–53-day PAM surveys from 14 June through 5 August 2022 and 2023, when murrelets typically make the most frequent inland flights during the nesting season. We found the average detection probability for murrelets on any given day was higher for an audio-visual survey visit (0.40, SD = 0.17) than for a PAM survey day (0.19, SD = 0.10). However, the cumulative detection probability for PAM surveys was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96–1.0) after 19 survey days, whereas the same cumulative detection probability would require 9 audio-visual survey visits. Using simulations to compare the cost-effectiveness of both methods, we found audio-visual surveys cost more when compared with PAM surveys in 61–91% of scenarios because they require specialized personnel training and additional pre-dawn visits. Further, PAM per survey costs decreased as the number of survey days per point increased and over time after initial costs were incurred, particularly when autonomous recording units were reused for multiple years. While audio-visual surveys are the standard method for murrelet surveys in forest habitats, PAM represents a more cost-effective approach to determine the presence of murrelets.

Oregon, Washington